- 最后登录
- 2012-8-27
- 在线时间
- 8 小时
- 寄托币
- 211
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-5
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 123
- UID
- 2527432

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 211
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-5
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
The law, which is used by each government (government 就够了吧…authority可能会重复)to secure the interests of individuals and communities, should be just and fair to protect every members of the society. And the natural character of laws calls for the balance, where there are both obedience to the just laws and the resistance to the unfair laws.The just laws, as the effective guardian against the crimes and disorder of the society, needs the public's supporting to play its role in the official events and the public's daily life. Admittedly the most laws in modern developed system of laws are just and effective. They protect the public to fight against the crimes. Toward to the criminal, the just laws not only ensure the punishment for the committer, but also deter the others who intend to form the potential bad ideas out of the laws. Meanwhile, the victims and their interests could be well protected to be safe and furthermore they secure the peaceful and steady society in which each social members will continue their work, study, and life. Therefore, the just laws have proven to be the basic principles for the behaviors of the social people, who have the responsibility to obey them.Resisting the unjust laws is not only the fighting for the equality, but also the necessary process for the development of the laws. In the market, unjust laws because of both the carelessness of the lawmakers or the special purpose of certain group's interests, undoubtedly broke the rules of the fair, and then create the damage or loss of the interests of some traders. While this unjust laws would always meant some extra profits than the people could gain, for others this is unfair. Resistance of the unfair laws could reveal the weakness and shortcoming directly and immediately. As the new laws, we cannot expect it to work completely perfect every time. The common sense tells us, the theory is more or less different from the practice. Therefore the available feedback information can efficiently improve the official government revising these laws. And some laws, which before worked very well, but with the development of the society or the economy are just out of the date, or cannot protect the interests of the public as efficient as before. Resisting to them could unfold the problems, and then lead to the change or the replacement by other new laws from the government. The revision or publishing of the new laws should make sure the development of the laws according to the development of the society and economy.(例子没举出来..光说some laws that…或者unjust laws 稍显抽象)Disobeying the unjust laws, which still remain their power of legality until its deadline of withdrawing, always mean to struggle in face of the authority, and power. This kind of behaviors is often indicates the level of the development of democracy of a society. Experts argue that a real democrat society should provide the opportunity of equality to small groups and large groups, individuals and communities. The unjust laws are just as the mistake of the official government. And any government which is built for the public should offer the public chances to reveal their mistakes, their unjust laws. That is not only the need of the official lawmakers, but also the demand of an equal, just, and democrat society.(可以考虑论证一下如果我们仅仅一味的遵守会怎样)In conclusion, people have the rights and duties offered by the laws that include the responsibility to resist to the unjust laws and the obeying of the unjust laws. And the stability and improvement of the society and economy require the people to obey just laws, meanwhile the democracy of the society and development of the law system call for the disobeying from public against the unjust laws.
(文章逻辑性很强,理论也很清楚,关键是例子少了点…光用演绎论证恐怕很难使读者信服,而且推理过多看的头也会有点晕…) |
|