- 最后登录
- 2017-1-5
- 在线时间
- 261 小时
- 寄托币
- 1465
- 声望
- 16
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-28
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 16
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 970
- UID
- 2538401
 
- 声望
- 16
- 寄托币
- 1465
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-28
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 16
|
When we set research priorities for science, education, or any other area, what’s the rules that we ought to obey? For the researcher, what should they consider before they launch their exploration? It’s no doubt that how many people will benefit from the research is a major orientation. In another direction, equally, its frontier nature is a factor which can’t be overlooked.
(从这起是单独一段吗?请下次把行空出来,我刚刚误会了)Human beings always carry on researches with the aim of getting a better future. Just as we know, only when the majority of people get a better life, the society’s level is said to have been improved. And for the masses, life’s improvement means to be more convenient and at ease. +例子、纳税人
However, just do some researches to satisfy the public’s needs are far from enough. Standing in the position of a nation, the decision-maker must consider how to protect the country and its folks, how to develop the country’s strength. For this, it’s their duty to prosecute the studies of military, though obviously its straightforward influence will not involve the public. A piece of news ever said that our country invested hundreds million to improve the quality of the spacesuits. What the clothes should be to let the astronaut move around in the outer space without receive the damaged radiation? It has been a vital research program for many countries which have the ambition and potential to quest the further mystery. How could we calculate the specific gravity of the huge sum of money we put into the program with the repayment to the ordinary people’ lives? The answer is lucid but we all know it’s deserved. For(删,或用because, for表原因不可以放句首) it may not contribute to our own life, (but)it will improve our posterity’s living.
And saying in another level, some researchers(researches) are belongs to(belong to) the kind which may not (be applied)apply in contemporary era but in a further time. (缺少过渡)One can rarely live without computer now. Studying, playing, working, we have to admit that it’s hard for us to get away from the little “notebook”. But a few decades ago, computer is just a heavy “box” which you can only do some straightforward calculation. And the user of it is not the public but the army. The primary purpose to invent computer is not for the public but the undercover military activities. At that time no one can forecast that with the development of the technology and update of the idea, computers walked out from the home of the peerage and then become an indispensable member of the boisterous world. It’s not a “baby” for the major, but it actually became. If we deny it when it first comes to the world because of the reason that it’s not useful for the masses, how could we get today’s achievement?
既然你要论证具有前瞻性的眼光也很重要,你虽然给出了电脑的例子,但我觉得缺少前人(你可以说是少部分人或者研究者)对它的前瞻性的看法,(大部分人是不看好它的研究),否则怎么说明当初决定研究电脑室是具有远见的呢(这个不是根据后来的结果看,而是在开发的时候研究者就具备了这样的眼光)?觉得加上这一点会更深刻。To take the priorities of researches into consideration, one may think over the universality and frontier simultaneously. Without universality, the majority of the society may query the effectiveness of the research. Without frontier,our life may miss some beautiful possibility when it goes on. Thus, while we consider the people’s amount who benefit from the research, it’s irrational to ignore the influence that a research can bring to our distant further life.
其实你思路和我很像,都论证了最重要的问题应不限于提高大多数人们的生活质量。但是你的主题是,提高大多数人的生活同时,具有前瞻性的眼光也很重要。觉得Without frontier,our life may miss some beautiful possibility when it goes on.这个思想很赞~电脑的例子也很不错~
你的词也用得很好,比较丰富~ |
|