【DIES IN FLAMES 0910G长线突破组】ISSUE69-By tracywlz

tracywlzUID: 2522388

69"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"

The scientific research can be confined by government by means of offering funds, limiting areas and even using law means. Since scientific research is not always have beneficial influence on society, and what's more, people's attitude can not be correctly represented by some special scientists. Therefore, we do need government force to make a reasonable restriction on research.

To begin with, it is the most direct way that government inducts the goal of a new research by offering special funds. This way usually becomes an indispensable force to lend scientists pay more attention to contemporary crisis rather than some fantastic occurrence that are merely about their own desires. Meanwhile, governmental fund are derived from civics' tax, people choose a responsibility government to manage the money and itself are reliable. Thus, to some extents, whether a government is willing or not to appropriate funds for a research, it actually presents most people's attitude, so in many occasion, the choosing research can lead a better life for human being. Taking some fierce contemporary crisis for instances, the present state of environment, energy sources, sustenance, and sanitation are all need some breakthrough in researches. So, an accelerate number of governments increase their fund of these areas, and of course many helpful researches are being set. However, caring about the global critics is not likely possible for some researcher, so if the government didn't restrict some researches and advocate others, these problems may not have rightly been solved.


Secondly, government can limit the extent of research or areas to avoid the baneful affect researches bringing. Without government's restriction to some dangerous and vital researches, some crazy scientists are supposed to avoid considering consequences and just do whatever they want. Moreover, the naive scientists may be assified by some conspirators, or the result would be harmful. For example, some researches about viruses. If these dangerous researches are not being protected by government, may be used as bio-arm by some terrorism, and finally do harm to human beings.

Thirdly, the government can astrict the development or procedure of research with the help of some special laws. The laws are setting for balancing the technology development and human moral standard movement. If some researches will lead to a result that conflict with most people's belief, law may make a limitation of the research and reduce this conflict to lowest. A bioethics example can strongly prove this view. Recently, the progress of stem cell research have been widely and fiercely debated, some biology scientist hold the view that government should cancel the circumscribe of use one human stem cell to create another, but some moralist and religionist believe we are forbidden to creating a human which is the God’s duty. Hence，in this point, the law made by government acts as balance between them and sustain the peaceful world so that government could place restrictions on research.

Admittedly, scientist is the spirit of research, they should and must be endowed enough freedom to transform their mind into facts rather than serve for the government. What's more, comparing with the government bureau, they are armed with scientific intuition and understanding, and can have a farsighted to see the prospect of a research. But do not forget, it is government who should be responsible for all the things happened in a society. Hence government ought to have rights to restrict the potential dangerous things’ produce –some vital researches.


In sum, as for some vital and dangerous researches, government should place some restrictions on them, but at the same time, we can not limit scientists’ thinking. Therefore, a well balance between them is required to most government.

GenevUID: 2543794

69"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"

The scientific research can be confined （不恰当，换成regulated） by government by (/through) means of offering (去掉这个词，改成名词排比) funds, limiting areas and even using law means. Since scientific research is （does） not always have beneficial influence on society, and what's more, people's attitude cannot be correctly represented by some special scientists.(这只是个分句，主句呢？) Therefore, we do need government force to make a （去掉a） reasonable restriction on research.

To begin with, it is the most direct way that government inducts the goal of a new research by offering special funds. This way usually becomes an indispensable force to lend scientists pay more attention to contemporary crisis rather than some fantastic occurrence that are merely about their own desires. Meanwhile, governmental fund are derived from civics' tax, people choose a responsibility government to manage the money and itself are reliable. Thus, to some extents, whether a government is willing or not to appropriate funds for a research, it actually presents most people's attitude, so in many occasion, the choosing research can lead a better life for human being. Taking some fierce contemporary crisis for instances, the present state of environment, energy sources, sustenance, and sanitation are all need (/needing) some breakthrough(s) in researches. So, an accelerate (increasing) number of governments increase their fund of (/on) these areas, and of course many helpful researches are being set (/carried out). However, caring about the global critics (/crisis) is not likely possible for some researcher(s), (逗号用错了，这里是并列句，用分号) so if the government didn't restrict some researches and advocate others, these problems may not have rightly been solved.
这段开始缺主题句，另外从思路上，很多研究是私人、公司开展的，你没有考虑到。


Secondly, government can limit the extent of research or areas to avoid the baneful affect researches bringing. Without government's restriction to （/on） some dangerous and vital researches, some crazy scientists are supposed to avoid considering consequences (这句不通) and just do whatever they want. Moreover (/or，哪里有递进了), the naive scientists may be assified by some conspirators, or （/then） the result would be harmful. For example, some researches about viruses （fall into this category）. If these dangerous researches are not being protected (/prohibit) by government, (they) may be used as bio-arm by some terrorism, and finally do harm to human beings.

Thirdly, the government can astrict the development or procedure of research with the help of some special laws. The laws are setting for balancing (/set to balance)  the technology development and human moral standard movement. If some researches will (删掉will) lead to a result that conflict with most people's belief, law may make a limitation of the research and reduce this conflict to lowest. A bioethics example can strongly prove this view. Recently, the progress of stem cell research have been widely and fiercely debated, some biology scientist hold the view that government should cancel the circumscribe (词性错误) of use （/on using） one human stem cell to create another, but some moralist(s) and religionist(s) believe we are forbidden to creating a human which is the God’s duty. Hence，in this point, the law made by government acts as balance between them and sustain the peaceful world so that government could place restrictions on research.

Admittedly, scientist is the spirit (/soul) of research, they should and must be endowed enough freedom to transform their mind (/creative ideas) into facts rather than serve for (serve for充当, 用作?) the government. What's more, comparing with the government bureau (/institutions), they are armed with scientific intuition and understanding, and can have a farsighted (词性不对) to see the prospect of a research. But do not forget, it is government who should be responsible for all the things （that） happened in a society. Hence government ought to have rights (and duty) to restrict the potential dangerous things’ (这个词去掉) produce –some vital researches.


In sum, as for some vital and dangerous researches, government should place some restrictions on them, but at the same time, we can not limit scientists’ thinking. Therefore, a well （/good） balance between them is required to (/for) most government(s).

每次写完后自己要修改一下，基本的语法要保证正确。
注意下段落内部结构。
第一篇字数还是不错的。

tracywlzUID: 2522388

我自己看了下才发来的，有时候刚写完看不到什么错误，要等几天后才发现~嗯，我以后会将语法搞定后再来折磨你的。呵呵。谢谢指导。先下了。明天看~

tracywlzUID: 2522388

更正。只改了字词，没改结构。

69"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
regulate 为管理，confine 为限制
The scientific research can be regulated by government by (/through) ？means of funds, areas and even law. Since scientific research does not always have beneficial influence on society, its result should be limited somewhat, and what's more, people's attitude cannot be correctly represented by some special scientists. Therefore, we do need government force to make reasonable restriction on research.

To begin with, it is the most direct way that government inducts the goal of a new research by offering special funds. This way usually becomes an indispensable force to lend scientists pay more attention to contemporary crisis rather than some fantastic occurrence that are merely about their own desires. Meanwhile, governmental fund are derived from civics' tax, people choose a responsibility government to manage the money and itself are reliable. Thus, to some extents, whether a government is willing or not to appropriate funds for a research, it actually presents most people's attitude, so in many occasion, the choosing research can lead a better life for human being. Taking some fierce contemporary crisis for instances, the present state of environment, energy sources, sustenance, and sanitation which all in need of some breakthroughs in researches. So, an increasing number of governments increase their fund on these areas, and of course many helpful researches are being carried out. However, caring about the global crisis is not likely possible for some researchers; so if the government didn't restrict some researches and advocate others, these problems may not have rightly been solved.
这段开始缺主题句，另外从思路上，很多研究是私人、公司开展的，你没有考虑到。


Secondly, government can limit the extent of research or areas to avoid the baneful affect researches bringing. Without government's restriction on some dangerous and vital researches, some crazy scientists are supposed to avoid considering consequences (这句不通) and just do whatever they want. Moreover (/or，哪里有递进了), the naive scientists may be assified by some conspirators, then the result would be harmful. For example, some researches about viruses fall into this category. If these dangerous researches are not being prohibit by government, they may be used as bio-arm by some terrorism, and finally do harm to human beings.

Thirdly, the government can astrict the development or procedure of research with the help of some special laws. The laws are set to balance the technology development and human moral standard movement. If some researches lead to a result that conflict with most people's belief, law may make a limitation of the research and reduce this conflict to lowest. A bioethics example can strongly prove this view. Recently, the progress of stem cell research have been widely and fiercely debated, some biology scientist hold the view that government should withdraw the ban on using one human stem cell to create another, but some moralists and religionists believe we are forbidden to creating a human which is the God’s duty. Hence，in this point, the law made by government acts as a balance between them and sustain the peaceful world so that government could place restrictions on research.

Admittedly, scientist is the soul of research; they should and must be endowed enough freedom to transform their creative ideas into facts rather than service for the government. What's more, comparing with the government institutions, they are armed with scientific intuition and understanding, and can have a far-sight to see the prospect of a research. But do not forget, it is government who should be responsible for all the things that happened in a society. Hence government ought to have rights and duty to restrict the potential dangerous produce –some vital researches.


In sum, as for some vital and dangerous researches, government should place some restrictions on them, but at the same time, we can not limit scientists’ thinking. Therefore, a fit balance between them is required for most governments.