0910G[North America Flying]Issue56 by fake

fake2009UID: 2631119

题目：ISSUE56 - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
字数：517
用时：00:42:27
日期：2009-7-17 10:16:45

What's the governments' essence and significance of existence? Ensure the harmonious social condition, from the perspective of politics, economy, culture; and then, to consider about the future development or prosperity of the nation. In this sense, solving the immediate problems of today and tomorrow is both indispensible and contains a sequence to some extend.

For one thing, solving the immediate problems of today could make a harmonious social condition. By this I mean, these problems such as poverty, thefts, terrorism, etc. which would cause the instability and chaos of the social order and regulations. While to appease the severe intensified issues of the society, it's necessary to solve these short-term problems. If the government put emphasis on these issue, spending money and energy, the situation shall be quickly altered and improved. The results are obvious and significant. As we can see the achievement in short-term problems once we begin to tackle with them, the government should pay attention to the immediate problems of today.

Is solving the long term problems of tomorrow of no use at no? The answer is obviously negative. Issues like environmental protection due to the severe worse living surroundings,
exploration of outer space due to the limited resources for our children and children's children, will directly affects the quality of the latter generations' life and the further development of the nation. One of the most vital competitions of future development is the battle for energy, especially those non-renewable resources. Thus the investment of the research of the new energy is also important though it cannot see the results immediately.

Moreover, to weigh which one deserves more concentration highly depend on the current social condition of the nation. Among nations those embrace a quite healthy political and economic circumstances, the immediate problems of today are not so urgent and serious, it's reasonable for the government not to exert their efforts at all strength. However, for those nations which have serious problems, like hunger, homelessness, poverty, these insecure social elements should be the focus of the government.

Between solving problems of today and tomorrow, to some extend, the former is the foundation or the prerequisite of the latter. That's normal for a nation which we regard as a highly cozy place to base is at the same time more prosperous in economy, culture, etc. Further more, the power of the culture of these countries even are often with great and vigorous influence to other nations. The international official language, English is always on the list, the computer programs over the world are written in English, for the effecting power of the United States and the Great Britain in the world. We all know that the Great Britain is a country which is really great and with tremendous power several decades ago. And the US is a great power of today.

In sum, the neglect of the latter is short-sighted, and the result would be the end of a cozy life. Distributions between the budget about these problems should be appropriate and affordable according to the detailed conditions of a specific nation. A balance should be reached.

fake2009UID: 2631119

What's the governments' essence and significance of existence? Ensure the harmonious social condition, from the perspective of politics, economy, culture; and then, to consider about the future development or prosperity of the nation. In this sense, solving the immediate problems of today and tomorrow is both indispensible and contains a sequence to some extend.

For one thing, solving the immediate problems of today could make a harmonious social condition. By this I mean, these problems such as poverty, thefts, terrorism, etc. which would cause the instability and chaos of the social order and regulations. While to appease the severe intensified issues of the society, it's necessary to solve these short-term problems. If the government put emphasis on these issue, spending money and energy, the situation shall be quickly altered and improved. The results are obvious and significant. As we can see the achievement in short-term problems once we begin to tackle with them, the government should pay attention to the immediate problems of today.

Is solving the long term problems of tomorrow of no use at no? The answer is obviously negative. Issues like environmental protection due to the severe worse living surroundings, exploration of outer space due to the limited resources for our children and children's children, will directly affects the quality of the latter generations' life and the further development of the nation. One of the most vital competitions of future development is the battle for energy, especially those non-renewable resources. Thus the investment of the research of the new energy is also important though it cannot see the results immediately.

Moreover, to weigh which one deserves more concentration highly depend on the current social condition of the nation. Among nations those embrace a quite healthy political and economic circumstances, the immediate problems of today are not so urgent and serious, it's reasonable for the government not to exert their efforts at all strength. However, for those nations which have serious problems, like hunger, homelessness, poverty, these insecure social elements should be the focus of the government.

Between solving problems of today and tomorrow, to some extent, the former is the foundation or the prerequisite of the latter. That's normal for a nation which we regard as a highly cozy place to base is at the same time more prosperous in economy, culture, etc. Furthermore, the power of the culture of these countries even is often with great and vigorous influence to other nations. The international official language, English is always on the list, the computer programs over the world are written in English, for the effecting power of the United States and the Great Britain in the world. We all know that the Great Britain is a country which is really great and with tremendous power several decades ago. And the US is a great power of today.

In sum, the neglect of the latter is short-sighted, and the result would be the end of a cozy life. Distributions between the budget about these problems should be appropriate and affordable according to the detailed conditions of a specific nation. A balance should be reached.

平衡观点
1.        开头，点明现在未来要都考虑
2.        解决现实问题是需要解决的，泛例是偷窃和贫困。
3.        未来问题是需要解决的，泛例是环境
4.        讨论这两者的关系，前者是后者的基础。

比较不错的写法，问题在于两点，具体而微的例子，现在和未来的关系的讨论那段

例子比较空泛，事实上贫困和偷窃，在我认为，属于长期问题。我觉得应该把短期理解为当代人的需要，长期理解为以后的人的需要，简单来说，可持续发展了就是了。可以具体的说到非洲，Zimbabwe的生活多么多么惨，UN又是多么多么担忧，在生活不能保证的时候我们怎么可能去考虑未来云云，这种例子很多，具体的例子总比空泛的论述有说服力

现在和未来的讨论那段牵涉得有些遥远，具体一点，前两段，现在是未来的基础，对未来的遐想能极大地促进现在的发展，当然也跟我们子孙后代有关，所以政府应该对这两方面都下苦工，这段就应该是具体问题具体分析的段落，哪个优先级更高应该跟当地的环境，文化，历史结合来讨论，富强的更多看未来，贫弱的更多看现在之类，再找两个例子往上一塞