用两天写出来的一篇ISSUE 求拍

c小调柔版UID: 2629750

ISSUE17"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
有两种法律:公正的和不公正的。每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正的法律，但是更正要的是应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。

Take a wide view of the development history of the human society, laws have been playing a crucial role that is the basis of a society to maintain public security and social stability. The innate function of the laws is to balance conflicting interests. I don’t think the Speaker’s statement is logical and permissible. Acctually, one cannot simply obey or disobey, or even resist the laws according to the judgement from the perspective of the individual, or else the authority and function of law will not exeist.

Law as social standards and rules of public, its fairness is relative, which cannot meet the satisfaction of everyone in society. What’s more, people’s perception of things is often influenced by subjective factors, for example, different moral outlooks of individuals may lead to different criteria to judge right from wrong. Some people who are engaged in recording pirated compact discs , violating the traffic rules, and so on, do not think what they are doing are immoral at all, even though they against the law. And from their standpoint, the laws that restricts them are unjust. While laws are always brought into correspondence with the public morality and is in the fundamental interest of the vast majority of the people, its justice cannot be accurately judged by ordinary individuals in the society.
法律的公平是相对的，每个人都有自己的观点立场。看法受主观因素左右。

In different countries, regions and with different cultural backgrounds, the laws may be different.It is unreasonable
and irresponsible to judge whether a law is fair or not merely proceeding from one’s own belief or experience. Consider, for example, in mainland China there is a gambling crime, which generally refers the behavior of taking profit’s making as the goal, gamble gathering, opening the gambing establishment as industry. However, gambling in Las vegas, America, is legal. 不同文化背景下的法律也不尽相同，不在特定背景文化下的人们如何判断法律的公正性。

Yet another fundamental problem with the statement is that it is not every ordinary person’s duty to disobey or resist the laws that contain flaws. It is the responsibility of legislators who possess certain relevant professional knowledge and the capability to amend, repeal or establish a law. However, individuals can show the discontents to the legislature once the legal rights of innocent people are violated or put forward constructive suggestions. 另外，对于普通人来说，反对和抵制法律并不是责任义务。然而我们可以向立法机构抗议或提建议。

In sum, because different countries or regions have laws based on different conditions and because the fairness of laws is impossible to satisfy everyone, it is difficult to judge whether a law is fair or not. Laws are the foudation to miantain public order and to secure people’s normal life, even though they may not be perfect. Individuals shouldn’t violate them on account of subjective and personal consideration, otherwise whole society will plunge into chaos.总结以上观点。

拍拍我吧

请好心人帮帮忙吧！！

c小调柔版UID: 2629750

没人拍 :hug:

c小调柔版UID: 2629750

很用心写的啊，虽然很烂。。。

c小调柔版UID: 2629750

我要快点写下一篇~~

Terrel123UID: 2572740

写的挺好的 4# c小调柔版

c小调柔版UID: 2629750

5# Terrel123
终于有人看了，谢谢~~~太谢谢了~~~~

Terrel123UID: 2572740

不用谢啊，呵呵，抓紧联系才是正道 6# c小调柔版

nauxUID: 2643801

个人感觉有些地方不是很通顺, 就直接改在里面了

Take a wide(broad) view of the development history(应该是history of development of, 但是太多of了, 可以简化为只要history) of the human society, laws have been playing a crucial role that is the basis of a society to maintain public security and social stability. The innate function of the laws is to balance conflicting interests. I don’t(感觉I think xxx is not 更书面) think the Speaker’s statement is logical and permissible(persuasive 可能更好). Acctually, one cannot simply obey or disobey, or(disobey and resist are not mutually exclusive here) even resist the laws according to the judgement from the perspective of the individual, or else the authority and function of law will not exeist(个人prefer cease to exist).

Law as social standards and rules of public, its fairness is relative, which cannot meet the satisfaction(its relative fairness renders it unable to reach the satisfaction) of everyone in society. What’s more, people’s perceptions of things is(are) often influenced by subjective factors, for example, different moral outlooks of individuals may lead to different criteria to judge(in judging) right from wrong. Some people who are(多余了) engaged in recording pirated(pirating就可以了, 动词重复了) compact discs , violating the(此处不特指较通顺) traffic rules, and so on, do not think what they are doing are immoral at all, even though they against(violated) the law. And from their standpoint, the laws that restricts them are unjust. While laws are(与后面一致) always brought into correspondence with the public morality and is in the fundamental interest of the vast majority of the(不特指) people, its justice(righteousness,或者fairness表示"xx性") cannot be accurately judged by ordinary individuals in the society.
法律的公平是相对的，每个人都有自己的观点立场。看法受主观因素左右。

In different countries, regions and(去掉) with different cultural backgrounds, the laws may be different. It is unreasonable
and irresponsible to judge whether a law is fair or not merely proceeding(去掉proceeding,judge from...就可以了) from one’s own belief or experience. Consider, for example, in mainland China there is a gambling crime, which generally refers the behavior of taking profit’s making as the goal, gamble gathering, opening the gambing establishment as industry.(这句话读起来感觉有点不通顺) However, gambling in Las vegas, America, is legal. 不同文化背景下的法律也不尽相同，不在特定背景文化下的人们如何判断法律的公正性。

Yet another fundamental problem with the statement is that it is not every ordinary person’s duty to disobey or resist the laws that contain flaws. It is the responsibility of legislators who possess certain relevant professional knowledge and the capability to amend, repeal or establish a law. However, individuals can show the discontents to the legislature once the legal rights of innocent people are violated(infringed) or put forward constructive suggestions. 另外，对于普通人来说，反对和抵制法律并不是责任义务。然而我们可以向立法机构抗议或提建议。

In sum, because different countries or regions have laws based on different conditions and because the fairness of laws is impossible to satisfy everyone, it is difficult to judge whether a law is fair or not. Laws are the foudation to miantain public order and to secure people’s normal life, even though they may not be perfect. Individuals shouldn’t violate them on account of subjective and personal consideration, otherwise the whole society will plunge into chaos.总结以上观点。