寄托天下
楼主: qz163z
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] 8.11作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
22
寄托币
471
注册时间
2009-2-6
精华
0
帖子
3
16
发表于 2009-9-3 04:12:52 |只看该作者
The professor argues that she didn’t agree attributed the transition from the factory industry to technological advances, legal protection, and a desire to save on cost, which differs from the main idea in the text.

First of all, the professor holds that technology was not major force because the shift from cottage industry to factory industry. The boss who in the early stages of industry was to hire more workers than use complex machine. Besides, the machines such as steam engines were not able to boost production at that time. However, the reading material believes that the reason is advances in technology. So the cotton production was forced to move out of homes into factories.

Second, Contradicting what is stated in the reading that another cause is the establishment of a stronger legal protection for private property, the professor consider that in Britain didn’t because cottage production to be replaced by factory production. And some place such as Holland will protect the capitalist’ property rights. It shows the establishment does not necessarily drive the cottage industry out of existence.

Finally, the professor states that the factory product didn’t sane on costs for capitalist in the early years. For example, it pay a lot of money to buy land, build factory building and hire supervisors, which directly confutes what the reading indicates, namely that the desire to reduce production cost which caused the move

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
386
注册时间
2008-8-27
精华
0
帖子
3
17
发表于 2009-9-3 17:58:38 |只看该作者
我用word改的  不好意思 昨天上不了网 迟到了

小猪 ppbbo改.doc

28.5 KB, 下载次数: 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
24
寄托币
867
注册时间
2007-10-28
精华
0
帖子
9
18
发表于 2009-9-3 18:22:49 |只看该作者
The professor argues that she didn’t agree attributed the transition from the factory industry to technological advances, legal protection, and a desire to save on cost, which differs from the main idea in the text.

First of all, the professor holds that technology was not major force because(caused) the shift from cottage industry to factory industry. The boss who(去掉) in the early stages of industry was to hire more workers than use complex machine(这句话有问题,应该是boss hired more…或boss was willing to hire). Besides, the machines such as steam engines were not able to boost production at that time. However, the reading material believes that the reason is advances in technology. So the cotton production was forced to move out of homes into factories.(这句有点多余)

Second, Contradicting what is stated in the reading that another cause is the establishment of a stronger legal protection for private property, the professor consider that in Britain didn’t because cottage production to be replaced by factory production. And some place such as Holland will protect the capitalist’ property rights. It shows the establishment does not necessarily drive the cottage industry out of existence.

Finally, the professor states that the factory product didn’t sane(save?) on costs for capitalist in the early years. For example, it pay a lot of money to buy land, build factory building and hire supervisors, which directly confutes what the reading indicates, namely that the desire to reduce production cost which caused the move.
加个总结吧,一句话就行

写的挺好,听的也很全面,文笔不错,句型好多啊
淡定,淡定

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
4
寄托币
505
注册时间
2009-7-30
精华
0
帖子
0
19
发表于 2009-9-4 09:27:30 |只看该作者
The professor argues that she didn’t agree attributed(to attribute) the transition from the factory industry(transition from cottage industry to factory industry) to technological advances, legal protection, and a desire to save on cost, which differs from the main idea in the text.

C: E# Z2 j$ z4 K
First of all, the professor holds that technology was not (the) major force because (of) the shift from cottage industry to factory industry. The boss who in the early stages of industry was to hire more workers than use complex machine. Besides, the machines such as steam engines were not able to boost production at that time. However, the reading material believes that the reason is advances in technology. So the cotton production was forced to move out of homes into factories.

Second, Contradicting what is stated in the reading that another cause is the establishment of a stronger legal protection for private property, the professor consider that in Britain didn’t because(it didn't cause) cottage production to be replaced by factory production. And some place such as Holland will(would) protect the capitalist’ property rights(but it didn't help the transition). It shows the establishment does not necessarily drive the cottage industry out of existence.

Finally, the professor states that the factory product didn’t sane on costs for capitalist in the early years. For example, it pay a lot of money to buy land, build factory building and hire supervisors, which directly confutes what the reading indicates, namely that the desire to reduce production cost which caused the move.

猪要注意细节哦~
9.12 上帝保佑~~

使用道具 举报

RE: 8.11作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
8.11作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-994952-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部