8.11作业

qz163zUID: 2599115

The professor argues that she didn’t agree attributed the transition from the factory industry to technological advances, legal protection, and a desire to save on cost, which differs from the main idea in the text.

First of all, the professor holds that technology was not major force because the shift from cottage industry to factory industry. The boss who in the early stages of industry was to hire more workers than use complex machine. Besides, the machines such as steam engines were not able to boost production at that time. However, the reading material believes that the reason is advances in technology. So the cotton production was forced to move out of homes into factories.

Second, Contradicting what is stated in the reading that another cause is the establishment of a stronger legal protection for private property, the professor consider that in Britain didn’t because cottage production to be replaced by factory production. And some place such as Holland will protect the capitalist’ property rights. It shows the establishment does not necessarily drive the cottage industry out of existence.

Finally, the professor states that the factory product didn’t sane on costs for capitalist in the early years. For example, it pay a lot of money to buy land, build factory building and hire supervisors, which directly confutes what the reading indicates, namely that the desire to reduce production cost which caused the move

ppbboUID: 2537437

我用word改的  不好意思 昨天上不了网 迟到了

goback211UID: 2419259

The professor argues that she didn’t agree attributed the transition from the factory industry to technological advances, legal protection, and a desire to save on cost, which differs from the main idea in the text.

First of all, the professor holds that technology was not major force because（caused） the shift from cottage industry to factory industry. The boss who(去掉) in the early stages of industry was to hire more workers than use complex machine（这句话有问题，应该是boss hired more…或boss was willing to hire）. Besides, the machines such as steam engines were not able to boost production at that time. However, the reading material believes that the reason is advances in technology. So the cotton production was forced to move out of homes into factories.(这句有点多余)

Second, Contradicting what is stated in the reading that another cause is the establishment of a stronger legal protection for private property, the professor consider that in Britain didn’t because cottage production to be replaced by factory production. And some place such as Holland will protect the capitalist’ property rights. It shows the establishment does not necessarily drive the cottage industry out of existence.

Finally, the professor states that the factory product didn’t sane（save?） on costs for capitalist in the early years. For example, it pay a lot of money to buy land, build factory building and hire supervisors, which directly confutes what the reading indicates, namely that the desire to reduce production cost which caused the move.
加个总结吧，一句话就行

写的挺好，听的也很全面，文笔不错，句型好多啊

arimidyUID: 2673973

The professor argues that she didn’t agree attributed(to attribute) the transition from the factory industry(transition from cottage industry to factory industry) to technological advances, legal protection, and a desire to save on cost, which differs from the main idea in the text.

C: E# Z2 j$ z4 K
First of all, the professor holds that technology was not (the) major force because (of) the shift from cottage industry to factory industry. The boss who in the early stages of industry was to hire more workers than use complex machine. Besides, the machines such as steam engines were not able to boost production at that time. However, the reading material believes that the reason is advances in technology. So the cotton production was forced to move out of homes into factories.

Second, Contradicting what is stated in the reading that another cause is the establishment of a stronger legal protection for private property, the professor consider that in Britain didn’t because(it didn't cause) cottage production to be replaced by factory production. And some place such as Holland will(would) protect the capitalist’ property rights(but it didn't help the transition). It shows the establishment does not necessarily drive the cottage industry out of existence.

Finally, the professor states that the factory product didn’t sane on costs for capitalist in the early years. For example, it pay a lot of money to buy land, build factory building and hire supervisors, which directly confutes what the reading indicates, namely that the desire to reduce production cost which caused the move.

猪要注意细节哦～