2009进军美利坚作文小组goback211第六次作业

goback211UID: 2419259

第一次写综合写作，感觉还是听力的问题没解决，听不出东西来
还有就是句式重复，总是同一种句型，而且中间的单词也没有变化，请大家猛拍

     In the reading material, the author claimed that the Anasazi disappeared because of a severe summer drought. On the contrary, the listening material contradicts the passage by saying that there are other reasons and the evidence showed in the writing is not sound.
      First of all, in the reading, the writer said the Anasazi suffered a severe summer drought caused by global warming and could not overcome it. On the other hand, the professor in the lecture challenges it by saying that the global warming occured in different places, not only in Anasazi. At the same time, there is evidence showing that there are trees in the Anasazi which have existed for several thousands of years. If there was a severe drought, the trees would have been died. The fact cast doubts on the reading materials.
      Secondly, the write of the passage outlined that the existence of the irrigation systems indicated the Anasazi suffered shortages of wather. In contrast, the lecture rebuts it from another aspects. In the view point of the talk, the irrigation systems did not necessarily mean the Anasazi suffered the lack of water. On the contrary, the dams helped them overcome the difficulties by storing water and crops. The Anasazi did not varnish owing to the drought.
        Thirdly, the reading claimed that the Anasazi have overgrown. However, the leture depart from it by saying that the climate was not so severe that the Anasazi abandoned their homes. At the same time, the objects left by them perhaps indicated that they were attacked by other tribes.
        In addition, the talk points out that there may be some other reasons, such as overuse of land and so on. It is not simply the drought. So the lecture contradicts the reading from several aspects.

我是chineseladyUID: 2662783

In the reading material, the author claimed that the Anasazi disappeared because of a severe summer drought. On the contrary,这个好! the listening material contradicts the passage by saying that there are other reasons and the evidence showed in the writing is not sound听着不通.

First of all, in the reading, the writer said the Anasazi suffered a severe summer drought caused by global warming and could not overcome it. On the other hand, the professor in the lecture challenges好 it by saying that the global warming occured in different places, not only in Anasazi. At the same time, there is evidence showing that there are trees in the Anasazi which have existed for several thousands of years. If there was a severe drought, the trees would have been died. The fact cast doubts on the reading materials.:victory:

Secondly, the write of the passage outlined that the existence of the irrigation systems indicated the Anasazi suffered shortages of wather. In contrast, the lecture rebuts it from another aspects. In the view point of the talk, the irrigation systems did not necessarily mean the Anasazi suffered the lack of water. On the contrary, the dams helped them overcome the difficulties by storing water and crops这个观点我只听到了一半. The Anasazi did not varnish owing to the drought.

Thirdly, the reading claimed that the Anasazi have overgrown. However, the leture depart from it by saying that the climate was not so severe that the Anasazi abandoned their homes. At the same time, the objects left by them perhaps indicated that they were attacked by other tribes

n addition, the talk points out that there may be some other reasons, such as overuse of land and so on. It is not simply the drought. So the lecture contradicts the reading from several aspects. 写的很好的额. 连接词用的好!还有句子!点都说了. 我想好像是最后的点少些吧...如果是一次写的那真是不错呐. 我的是只听一次写一次. 因为作文不好想听听大家的意见.