- 最后登录
- 2013-3-17
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 163
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-8-13
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 201
- UID
- 2127664

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 163
- 注册时间
- 2005-8-13
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
第十一期:Issue47
"Society does not place enough emphasis on the intellect—that is, on reasoning and other cognitive skills."
(社会对人类智力即逻辑推理和其他认知技能没有予以足够的重视)
论点:社会虽没有单独明确的强调这两方面的技能,但是社会在它实际的发展过程中却时时刻刻都在对我们强调这两方面的技能
OUTLINE:
P1:首先根据现在社会的复杂性,给出什么是逻辑技能和认知技能
P2:社会可能确实没有单独和明确对我们提出这两项技能的重要性,而且也没有必要去花这精力去提出。(这些技能作为一种[基本的生存的工具]没有必要花这些精力)
P3:但是这并不意味着社会没有给予足够的重视,反而在它发展各个方面都有重视这些技能
WORD:632
A brilliant performance of an opera needs a group of skilled and excellent actors. Equally, a society, developed rapidly, demands us have a higher capability, especially on reasoning and cognition.[个人认为这个类比不好, skilled and excellent 只能有很少数人达到,或者说是针对不同艺术式的不同类型的观众.然而,题目中society是个泛指的概念, 表达了社会中的大多数人都具有reasoning and cognition的能力, 是一种基本能力的意思.(正如你提纲中第二点所说)] Although there is not a specific emphasis on these two skills in our society, they, as an [a]basic requirement on surviving in nowadays, are emphasized momently[constantly/continuously, 总觉得momently用在这里有点怪, 好像是在强调那种时时刻刻的感觉.] in various aspects. [前后的说法感觉有点矛盾, 在这里你区别了specific emphasis和 constant emphasis两个概念,可是我觉得这两个的差别并不显而易见,所以前后两个emphasis给人的直接感觉就是有点矛盾. 用不同的词可能好一点.]
Starting from the premise that every definition has an appropriate meaning when it adapts itself to a specific condition. Therefore, in today's society ,flooded with high-tech, furious competitions and complex information, the skills on reasoning and cognition are influenced by many factors. Considering a complexity of the society, sometimes it is difficult, or even unable, to distinguish right from wrong. The contradictions are always existed, such as a conflict between a counteractive function and a possitive [positive]effect by[of] using a chemical insecticide. On one hand, this insecticide may reduce the numbers of pests. From this view, the reasoning that this chamical [chemical] insecticide can be used widely, which can be deduced easily, however, is not comprehensive, nor dose the cognition that this insecticide is effective.[明白了最后这个分句的意思,可是语法上就不知所云了,缺少谓语.这句总体感觉不太自然,看起来断断续续的.] Because on the other hand, an ability[???ability] on adequate variability will leads an increase in the number of mutants, then, the insecticide loses its effectiveness. Besides, this insecticide may not fit all kinds of insects.[以上给出了事物矛盾的性质,举例很好] Draw a conclusion, the definition on reasoning[你相当于做了这样一个推理,事物是矛盾的――reasoning and cognition的定义, 感觉论证脱节.你可以说, 因为我们面对的问题是……..性质,所以我们认识事物的方法应该是…….] is the ability to deduce a most reasonable conclusion from comprehensive surveys. And the definition on cognition is to understand the essence and the internal rules from a series phenomenons.
From the vision of the definition of these two skills, they are the basic requirements in the contemporary society. To discriminate among the options avilable,[available] one shoule konw [should know]how to locate himself and how to plan a way of prograss.[to progress][这句话可不是那么English 啊,呵呵] A proper reasoning about the trend of developing and a comprehensive cognition about current situations is absolutely necessary. One should estimate his ability correctly and consider the possible consequence properly before doing a certain thing. For example, a market research guarantees a profitable selling. Thus, these two skills are just like the ability in walking and respiration.[这种类比只能说明两者都是必须的,但是对于你所想要表达的instinctive我认为不是很好, 因为guarantee the profit并不是天生就具有的能力,即便是经过学习,也要多年的实践锻炼才能达到,而且还要受到外界的环境影响.我觉得你忽视了重要的一点,reasoning and cognition并不是象吃饭喝水那样不学习就具有,它们都要经过学习才会得到,特别是reasoning and cognition的方法是很重要的方面,另外,这种能力不是静止的,而是随着社会的发展需要不断增强的.] Moreover, birds learn to fly by their instincts, and infants learn to walk by their desire for cognizing the world. Equally, an initiative on learning these two skills as the instinct and the aspiration is taken by all of us. [上面的例子没有说明在这段中最基本的观点,因为你没有阐述这种instinctive 和reasoning and cognition 之间的关系, 无论是walk还是 respire 都没有经过reasoning and cognition 的过程, 至少不是显而易见的, 这样就不能说服别人.]Thereby, for a wasting of resources and energies, there is no need for the society to offer us a specialized training on these skills. Accordingly, it is, indeed, infrequent to find an obvious measure on emphasizing those two skills alone in the society.[这两句话有点绝对,比如类比,推理,查阅等这些技能与方法都是我们经过学习和练习才具有的,社会也投入了力量培养我们的这些技能.]
Notwithstanding an infrequency on specific training, those two skills are stressed by the society in many other ways. [这里有点不太清楚,特别是在几个概念的区分上,比如你上段说society没有必要花精力,这段说社会各界的压力,这两个society好象在文中不一样]As the basic prerequisite to the society's progress, the ability on reasoning and the cognition is already intermingled with every areas in the society, such as natural science, social science, social production, art and so on. Take the transgenic soy beans, which applied to the mass production in agricultural, as an example. Nor would these soy beans have popularized, if the researchers had concentrated their energies on how to explore them exclusively. More careful reasonings and cognitions were involved into their considerations. Whether[would] those soy beans lead an additional influence to the people and the environment or not, researchers did comprehensive surveys and anticipations. Also in a job interview, the company regards one's capability on market analysis and market forecast highly. When confront with the rapid-developing world, one will handle a more complex problem and situation, the demand on these two skills are emphasized highly by the society than ever before.[这段的后半部分说的比较清楚]
Therefore, by the emphasis on our intellect on reasoning and cognition from the society momently, an initiative on improving these two skills should be regarded highly by ourselves.
呵呵,得知你没有装word,那么错误就不算多了,加油啊(不过我个人认为,word还是必要的,否则有的小错误可能自己根本检查不到,特别是经常出现的手误,看起来还觉得是对的,呵呵)
这种写法比较新颖,经验不多,所以我就不做评论了.
第一个body段的逻辑组织不是很好, 很像中文常用的行文方式, 先做很多分析和铺垫,然后再得出结论. 我个人不赞成这么写,我认为ts一定要清楚,一方面是老外的习惯,另一方面考虑到阅卷考官好给分.
第二个body中逻辑有点难以接受,感觉类比不是很恰当,也许你说的是对的,但是不是很直观贴切.
第三个body中,过渡的部分我觉得不是很好,我认为问题出在上面一段,虽然细看似乎合理,但总觉得有点偷换概念和矛盾. 后面证明社会对reasoning and cognition的能力很重视写的挺好,思路挺清楚,看来是好好审了题的了.
这是我的意见,希望大家共同进步!
Dzhb644
2006-2-25 |
|