issue4 大家帮忙拍拍

westlife007_huUID: 2270665

4、"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."

The speaker asserts that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. In my opinion, I fundamentally agree with the speaker that the development of one certain area, whether artistic or scientific, tightly associates with the contribution of other fields. However, utilizing immature experience and knowledge from other fields is probable to produce negative effects and even result in disasters to us human beings.

To begin with, as is well known that knowledge is a complicated network composed of myriads of subjects which interconnect with each other, through making good use of the knowledge and technology from outsider can one certain area achieve a huge progress. This is true especially among various scientific fields. A classical case in point refers to the discovery of double helical structure of DNA by four scientists coming from four different fields. So as to predict the structure of DNA, they launched a range of chemical, physical and biological experiment and finally testified it. It is the interaction of diverse scientific areas that bring about a tremendous advancement in exploring the mystery of life and opens up a brand new time of modern biology. Not only does the interaction of various disciplines exist among scientific areas, but it also appears between art and science. Here is an instance that is convincing. Leonardo Da Vinci applied the knowledge of anatomy and mathematics to accomplish “Vitruvian Man”, one of the most celebrated artistic works throughout the entire anthropic history. Without profound comprehension and conversance of anatomy and mathematics, it is unlikely for Leonardo Da Vinci to create such an inestimable work which is greatly honored and praised by descendants. Therefore, it goes without saying that exertion of the knowledge and technology from other relative realms can make more valuable contributions.

Furthermore, the perspectives from outside disciplines also perform a pivotal role in inspiring and instructing by the means of guiding a correct direction and providing fresh ideas. For example, as is so often pointed, all the scientific realms are established upon the basis of philosophy. Philosophical perspectives contain suspicious spirit, analytical and summary methods, all of which have been applied to scientific fields. Without suspicious spirit, there is no emergency of Einstein’s relativity theory contradictory with Newton’s Law; without analytical method, there is no formulation and principle generalized relying on analysis; without summary methods, there is no conclusion drew according to various phenomena or innumerable results of experiment. The thoughts of philosophy serve as a compass to steer scientific fields a right path to evolution. Thereby, borrowing the idea from other areas to address problem sometimes can be more efficacious to work out a solution.

Nevertheless, not all the knowledge and experience from outsider is beneficial. The manifestation of my point is that immature knowledge and experience from other areas may even cause more serious consequence far beyond our imagination. In the year of 1947, Sweden chemist invented a kind of pesticide called DDT in short, which made him win the Nobel Prize. From that time on. People began to use DDT in a host of fields such as agriculture and medicine owing to its powerful virtue to kill pests. After a few decades, in the light of the universal utilization of DDT for ages, the quantity of DDT in the natural environment has accumulatively reached considerably high, which gives rises to the deaths of many animals and destructs the balance of global ecological system. From what I have discussed above, it is obviously that the harm of using immature knowledge and experience from other areas should not be underestimated.

In sum, the interplay among various fields functions as synergy that accelerates the development of each of them. However, utilizing knowledge and experience from other fields might be tempting to lead to negative effects. Therefore, our attitude toward it should be circumspect and the application of knowledge and experience from other fields should be carried out under a full-scale evaluation.

[ 本帖最后由 westlife007_hu 于 2006-12-28 23:12 编辑 ]

lonixUID: 2202232

楼主的文章写的真好啊，句式优美，分析透彻简直无懈可击，不知道是不是在限定的时间内完成的大作？
如果是这样的话，小弟我实在是自愧不如阿，还得向这位大哥或是大姐多多学习。

christainUID: 2200210

The speaker asserts that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. In my opinion, I fundamentally agree with the speaker that the development of one certain area, whether artistic or scientific, tightly associates with the contribution of other fields. However, utilizing immature experience and knowledge from other fields is probable to produce negative effects and even result in disasters to us human beings.

To begin with, as is well known that knowledge is a complicated network composed of myriads of subjects which interconnect with each other, through making good use of the knowledge and technology from outsider can one certain area achieve a huge progress. This is true especially among various scientific fields. A classical case in point refers to the discovery of double helical structure of DNA by four scientists coming from four different fields. So as to predict the structure of DNA, they launched a range of chemical, physical and biological experiment and finally testified it. It is the interaction of diverse scientific areas that bring(s) about a tremendous advancement in exploring the mystery of life and opens up a brand new time(era) of modern biology. Not only does the interaction of various disciplines exist among scientific areas, but it also appears between art and science. Here is an instance that is convincing(你在哪见过这种用法，这是我看的第2次了，个人觉得不好). Leonardo Da Vinci applied the knowledge of anatomy and mathematics to accomplish “Vitruvian Man”, one of the most celebrated artistic works throughout the entire anthropic history. Without profound comprehension and conversance of anatomy and mathematics, it is unlikely for Leonardo Da Vinci to create such an inestimable work which is greatly honored and praised by descendants. Therefore, it goes without saying that exertion of the knowledge and technology from other relative realms can make more valuable contributions.

Furthermore, the perspectives from outside disciplines also perform a pivotal role in inspiring and instructing by the means of guiding a correct direction and providing fresh ideas. For example, as is so often pointed, all the scientific realms are established upon the basis of philosophy. Philosophical perspectives contain suspicious spirit, analytical and summary methods, all of which have been applied to scientific fields. Without suspicious spirit, there is no emergency(这个词是紧急情况的意思) of Einstein’s relativity theory contradictory with Newton’s Law; without analytical method, there is no formulation and principle generalized relying on analysis; without summary methods, there is no conclusion drew according to various phenomena or innumerable results of experiment. The thoughts of philosophy serve as a compass to steer（steer这样用不知道可不可以） scientific fields a right path to evolution. Thereby, borrowing the idea from other areas to address problem sometimes can be more efficacious to work out a solution.

Nevertheless, not all the knowledge and experience from outsider is beneficial. The manifestation of my point is that immature knowledge and experience from other areas may even cause more serious consequence far beyond our imagination. In the year of 1947, Sweden chemist invented a kind of pesticide called DDT in short（这个用来做总结的）, which made him win the Nobel Prize. From that time on. People began to use DDT in a host of fields such as agriculture and medicine owing to its powerful virtue to kill pests. After a few decades, in the light of the universal utilization of DDT for ages, the quantity of DDT in the natural environment has accumulatively reached considerably high, which gives rises to the deaths of many animals and destructs the balance of global ecological system. From what I have discussed above, it is obviously that the harm of using immature knowledge and experience from other areas should not be underestimated.

In sum, the interplay among various fields functions as synergy that accelerates the development of each of them. However, utilizing knowledge and experience from other fields might be tempting to lead to negative effects. Therefore, our attitude toward it should be circumspect and the application of knowledge and experience from other fields should be carried out under a full-scale evaluation.

评语： 1、文章论证的不错 2、语言方面：词汇丰富，但有些短语用的不对

westlife007_huUID: 2270665

谢谢你的批改
昨天写这一篇写昏头了,感觉很不好,说到最后没话讲了
所以错误比较多,很多用法不知道能不能就直接用了
而且这几天速度一直提不上来,非常郁闷

我用in short是想表示缩写,请问应该怎么讲啊

[ 本帖最后由 westlife007_hu 于 2006-12-29 22:32 编辑 ]

candyliuliuUID: 2235220

呵呵~~你的issu写的和我在准备06/6g时写的很象~~句式用的也差不多~~感决就象在看2月份时自己写的东西~~dna，da vinci的利子我准备时也用过~~

你写的挺不错的；对理科生来说实属不易~角度拉得很开~~

我不知到你现在是多少时间内完成的~~我前面也看过你写的东西~~知到你是一名新手

我认为对你来说，你所要做的就是归类，整理才料，提目~~我可以看出你的功底还是不错的~~我aw是今年2/15日左右考的~~我之前是化了一个月时间做些整理，列提刚的工作~~就是在上考场前的15天左右每天练一套，熟西下见盘，就写了15篇~~最后aw是5。5~~

对你来说，多写真的是一种时间上的浪费~~整理，分类工作做了好的，一练就会决的很上手~~我没看过任何高频，事实上春节期间考的人本身就少，没人把高频贴出来，我当时考的是那篇science和arts什么的~~我练第1篇issue用了46分种，后面基本都是40分种620字左右的~~最快的是36分种写完~~我的感决就是有了一定写作功底的话（我的老托作文twe是满分）最主要的就是提刚和例子~~没必要一定要搞成每周写个1，2篇的，纯翠是浪费时间和体力，这点时间你还是用来看红宝更明智些~:)

[ 本帖最后由 candyliuliu 于 2006-12-29 23:13 编辑 ]

westlife007_huUID: 2270665

谢谢你,真的很谢谢你来看我的作文

我以前没考过t,几年没怎么写过英文作文了
我现在遇到一个很难的问题,写issue的时候整体筐架在脑子里很清楚,但是发现每段每段写完TS去论述的时候不能在很快的时间内有效的组织语言,所以时间拖的很长,都不好意思说.我感觉一个是思路跟不上,一个是语言驾驭很成问题.所以现在非常困惑,也非常着急

[ 本帖最后由 westlife007_hu 于 2006-12-29 23:30 编辑 ]

candyliuliuUID: 2235220

语言~~你是说词汇方面的~~老toefl的张红岩那本里的词汇我觉的足够了~~我决的你可能定位过高，可能是6分吧~~6分的话的确对词汇有很高的要求，要求你词汇的精准度，而且也有rp的因素在（呵呵，个人觉的）~~5分对理科的决对是太够了，申07fall的，很多理科生4分算可以的了，好的4。5，5分的已经很少的了~~不少文科生也就4，4。5的~~

你词汇不要多在红宝的词汇里多做文章，不值~~句式，我决的练个10篇的基本就知到了该怎么写~~你的问提还是出在没有整理，归类上~~整理工做做的好的，你应该有一种脑子里有很多句行的感决，而不是缺乏感~~你不作整理归纳的，我觉的你写过30篇的和没写过或写个2，3篇的没有很本质的进步，只不过对issue的写作有个大概的了解~~把所有185篇都写下来的，真是一件体力活~~

所以再次劝你好好总结，放慢整篇写作的进度（我发现你好象一周交个3篇的样子）~~一周写一套~~我知到你aw是定在3月考的~~

argu的写作更是重在整理，归类~~没有任何的技术含量~~

[ 本帖最后由 candyliuliu 于 2006-12-29 23:34 编辑 ]

westlife007_huUID: 2270665

谢谢前辈的指点,很受益

我的定位不是很高,希望能保证上4分
主要是怕限时这一关过不了
我是应该开始整理整理例子,写提纲了,现在完全把时间耗在写作上了

candyliuliuUID: 2235220

恩~~提刚，例子先整理~~

你如果用40分种issue能达到现在的水平，5分应该没多大问提的~~

最後の使徒UID: 2257608

看了下楼主的文章, 觉得花了太多功夫在例子的叙述上了, 特别是DDT那个, 如果字打不了太快的话最好取舍下. 我觉得前面几段都很好, 到了最后那段却TS完了直接就是大段的例子叙述, 总结的话跟TS又是一个意思. 不如把例子简短些, 然后做些原理性的分析, 比如为什么不成熟的科技会造成危害.

另外chemist能算outsider么.....杀虫剂在那个时候没有形成独立的生物化学专业, 说米勒同学是专家也不为过吧, 而且他用了15年的时间去研究....总之感觉这个例子很怪, 可能是最后一段也写虚了, 所以说明性文字没前面那么有效了吧

westlife007_huUID: 2270665

谢谢你的建议
你说的很有道理，关于第四段的问题我其实在写的时候已经考虑到了，只是确实已经写的无话可说了，不知道怎么分析了，所以草草结尾
而且DDT这个例子我个人感觉也很怪，可能也不是很精准，只是当时没找到比较合适的例子．考虑到DDT是化学领域的发现，但后来被广泛用与农业，工业，医学等领域，貌似符合题目的意思，就勉强拿来用了