寄托天下
查看: 964|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue51 请指教,有拍必回,请留链接,谢谢~~~ [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
2308
注册时间
2004-10-24
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-7-26 11:54:34 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
------题目------
Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.
------正文------
Education is provided for the whole citizens. Someone argues that it is effective to design education specifically for individual needs and interests, which I do not agree. In my opinion, it is worthless and unfair to design education for individuals.

First of all, it is time-consuming and expensive to specifically design education to meet the individual needs and interests. During the process of designing, the government and school may spend a lot time to evaluate each student's personality and characteristics, which is a huge project. In fact, each student's feature is much different from each other. It is difficult for the government and school to design a proper way of education for each student. In this way, even though they spend much time to design personal education, they may not find out proper results. Moreover, by designing education, the government and school may invest a lot money and stuff to the project. There are a number of fields such as the science researches and national security for the government to support. Also there are numbers of students who are too poor to pay the education fees for schools to help. It is not a wise idea to specifically design education for each student. Thus, it is not an effective way to design education for individuals. Instead, it is a way of wasting time and money.

Furthermore, to some extent, it is unfair to design education for each student. It is possible for the government and schools in developed areas of a country to design education for individuals. However, it is probably that the students in remote and developing areas are unable to receive the education that is specifically designed for them. In this way, it is unjust for them to receive different education. In addition, if the whole country provide the same education, it is beneficial for all the students. For example, when a student transfers to another city, he may not meet any difficulty in studies in the new environment. However, if the new school cannot offer specifically designed education for him, he may lose the interests of studying. Therefore, it is fair and beneficial for all the students to receive the same education.

Admittedly, in some situations schools may provide some education specifically designed for a group of students. It is likely that a variety of students have the same interests and needs. In this way, if schools have the ability to offer some courses to meet such students' needs, it is an effective way to cultivate these students' interests. For example, some schools in Shanghai provide several special courses on natural science and foreign culture to meet the students’ needs. By doing so, the students may learn something they are interested in effectively, and it may arouse their passion to do more research on their interests. Hence, in some ways, it is an effective for schools to design some courses to meet the need of students who have similar interests.

To sum up, in my opinion it is not effective to design education to meet every student's interests and needs. Because it is time-consuming, expensive and unnecessary to do so. Instead, schools may offer some special courses for students who have similar interests.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
2308
注册时间
2004-10-24
精华
0
帖子
2
沙发
发表于 2005-7-26 12:15:12 |只看该作者
ding~~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
16
寄托币
7314
注册时间
2005-3-7
精华
3
帖子
30
板凳
发表于 2005-7-26 14:51:03 |只看该作者
哈哈,这篇我写过:lol

Education is provided for the whole citizens. Someone argues that it is effective to design education specifically for individual needs and interests, which I do not agree. In my opinion, it is worthless and unfair to design education for individuals.
(SOMEONE ARGUE这种开头最要不得。多看看老外280的开头。)
First of all, it is time-consuming and expensive to specifically design education to meet the individual needs and interests. During the process of designing, the government and school may spend a lot time to evaluate each student's personality and characteristics, which is a huge project. In fact, each student's feature is much different from each other. It is difficult for the government and school to design a proper way of education for each student. In this way, even though they spend much time to design personal education, they may not find out proper results. Moreover, by designing education, the government and school may invest a lot money and stuff to the project. There are a number of fields such as the science researches and national security for the government to support(这和教育有什么关系?太突兀。加上which also are costly也许好些。但是要钱的地方多了,为什么只提这个?还是不合理。不如去掉这句。下面那句也一样). Also there are numbers of students who are too poor to pay the education fees for schools to help. It is not a wise idea to specifically design education for each student. Thus, it is not an effective way to design education for individuals. Instead, it is a way of wasting time and money.

Furthermore, to some extent, it is unfair to design education for each student. It is possible for the government and schools in developed areas of a country to design education for individuals. However, it is probably that the students in remote and developing areas are unable to receive the education that is specifically designed for them(理由?). In this way, it is unjust for them to receive different education. In addition, if the whole country provide the same education, it is beneficial for all the students. For example, when a student transfers to another city, he may not meet any difficulty in studies in the new environment. However, if the new school cannot offer specifically designed education for him, he may lose the interests of studying. Therefore, it is fair and beneficial for all the students to receive the same education.(感觉你对题目的理解有偏差。题目问是否应该因材施教。这和费用的关系不大。比如老师给不同学生布置不同作业等)

Admittedly, in some situations schools may provide some education specifically designed for a group of students. It is likely that a variety of students have the same interests and needs. In this way, if schools have the ability to offer some courses to meet such students' needs, it is an effective way to cultivate these students' interests. For example, some schools in Shanghai provide several special courses on natural science and foreign culture to meet the students’ needs. By doing so, the students may learn something they are interested in effectively, and it may arouse their passion to do more research on their interests. Hence, in some ways, it is an effective for schools to design some courses to meet the need of students who have similar interests.

To sum up, in my opinion it is not effective to design education to meet every student's interests and needs. Because it is time-consuming, expensive and unnecessary to do so. Instead, schools may offer some special courses for students who have similar interests.

总体来说,感觉不太好。有转圈说重复话的嫌疑。:lol
对问题的理解不好,写成了基本反对型,但是给出的理由并不能让人信服。
B1的理由是花钱。但有多花钱,你有数据么?有实践失败的例子么?都没有。
老师给不同学生布置不同作业,因材施教,这是对老师的要求的提高,这本身并不花很多钱的。
这是我写的ISSUE51。感觉不错:victory:
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=304248

[ Last edited by zehua on 2005-7-26 at 14:55 ]

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
22
注册时间
2005-7-22
精华
0
帖子
0
地板
发表于 2005-7-28 15:35:45 |只看该作者
这篇我刚写过,有兴趣请指教
不过感觉我好像跑题了... 没有批驳design 而是在批驳 only...
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=307649


Education is provided for the whole citizens. Someone argues that it is effective to design education specifically for individual needs and interests, which I do not agree. In my opinion, it is worthless and unfair to design education for individuals.

First of all, it is time-consuming and expensive to specifically design education to meet the individual needs and interests. During the process of designing, the government and school may spend a lot time to evaluate each student's personality and characteristics, which is a huge project. In fact, each student's feature is much different from each other. It is difficult for the government and school to design a proper way of education for each student. In this way, even though they spend much time to design personal education, they may not find out proper results. Moreover, by designing education, the government and school may invest a lot money and stuff to the project. There are a number of fields such as the science researches and national security for the government to support. Also there are numbers of students who are too poor to pay the education fees for schools to help. It is not a wise idea to specifically design education for each student. Thus, it is not an effective way to design education for individuals. Instead, it is a way of wasting time and money.
(感觉题目说 efficient 的意思是design 后的education 对于那个individual 来说是 efficient的, 而你好像在批驳这个design的过程是in-efficient的,这是我的理解 )

Furthermore, to some extent, it is unfair to design education for each student. It is possible for the government and schools in developed areas of a country to design education for individuals. However, it is probably that the students in remote and developing(不发展的?) areas are unable to receive the education that is specifically designed for them. In this way, it is unjust for them to receive different education. In addition, if the whole country provide the same education, it is beneficial for all the students. For example, when a student transfers to another city, he may not meet any difficulty in studies in the new environment. However, if the new school cannot offer specifically designed education for him, he may lose the interests of studying. Therefore, it is fair and beneficial for all the students to receive the same education.
(感觉这个例子不是很合适,根据你下一段的论述,如果提供可选择的课程的话,转学后还是有可能满足个人的学习需要的)

Admittedly, in some situations schools may provide some education specifically designed for a group of students. It is likely that a variety of students have the same interests and needs. In this way, if schools have the ability to offer some courses to meet such students' needs, it is an effective way to cultivate these students' interests. For example, some schools in Shanghai provide several special courses on natural science and foreign culture to meet the students’ needs. By doing so, the students may learn something they are interested in effectively, and it may arouse their passion to do more research on their interests. Hence, in some ways, it is an effective for schools to design some courses to meet the need of students who have similar interests.

To sum up, in my opinion it is not effective to design education to meet every student's interests and needs. Because it is time-consuming, expensive and unnecessary to do so. Instead, schools may offer some special courses for students who have similar interests.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
2308
注册时间
2004-10-24
精华
0
帖子
2
5
发表于 2005-7-29 12:36:12 |只看该作者
谢谢enigma9 的意见,你的我马上就看:)

使用道具 举报

RE: issue51 请指教,有拍必回,请留链接,谢谢~~~ [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue51 请指教,有拍必回,请留链接,谢谢~~~
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-306304-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部