寄托天下
查看: 922|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] Argument73 同主题,求拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
583
注册时间
2005-11-2
精华
0
帖子
19
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2006-2-27 18:38:06 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
提纲:
1、文章说this year大多数人都开租赁车。这点是不对的。虽然前几年确实租车的人比买车的人多。可能是因为他们的钱不够,买不起。然而现在几年后,有钱了去买车而不租车呢?
2、即使this year确实像文章说的都租车,然而租出去一辆车的利润和卖出去一辆车的利润应该是不可比的。租的人多,并不能够说明利润就多。A.首先,注意题目中说的都是 leasing new cars.有可能大家都爱租新车,租了一年就换,去租别的新车。这些新车从哪里来,还不是car dealership卖出来的。如果大家都只租新车的话,那么被租过的旧车就没有市场了,中间所费的成本,甚至可能高于一年出租的利润。B. 贸然转化经营方向,customer loyalty, 公司经验不足,市场饱和,竞争问题。。。等等。总之,就是不一定赚钱。

In this argument, the manager recommends that car dealer should change the focus of their business from selling cars to leasing them. To support this recommendation, the manager points out that leasing new cars has surpassed the number buying new cars. Then, reasons that the majority of drivers will be driving leased this year. The argument relies on a series of unsubstantiated assumptions, which render it unconvincing as it stands.

In the first place, the manager unfairly assumes that when comes to the case that the cars reaching their driving age this year, most car owners would choose to lease a new car but not buying a new one. Then as a result majority of drivers will be driving leased cars this year. It is true that people inclined to lease in the last five years. However, this would not indicate that this year most people would also choose to lease. It is entirely possible that before this year many people do not have enough money to buy a new car, so as an alternative they choose to lease. But five years past, the situation change they could afford a new car. The manager's assumption also ignores the possibility that people's consumption conception suddenly changed this year, they all come to purchase new cars. Then new car consumption this year may outnumber car leases. Without taking into account these possibilities, the manager cannot persuade me that majority of drivers will drive leased cars.

In the second place, even if this year most drivers would chose to lease, changing the focus of the car dealer’s business from selling cars to leasing them would get profit is uncertain. Car dealer could not gain the same profit from leasing a car as selling out a new car. Then the mere fact that the number of people leasing new cars surpassed the number buying new cars could not ensure more profit. The manager also fails to take into account other factors that would influence company's profit. Convert business direction may result in inefficient customer loyalty, short of experience, market saturation and competition. In short, without any evidence that the car dealer would handle all this uncertainties successfully, the manager's conclusion remains dubious at best.

In conclusion, the argument is indefensible as it stands. To strength the argument, the manager must rule out the actual circumstance of leasing car market this year. To better access the argument it would be useful to know other factors that have influence on company's profit.

这是我的第一篇,希望大家能够帮忙看看,指出我的缺点来。
0 0

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument73 同主题,求拍 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument73 同主题,求拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-416663-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部