issue51 Myth小组第2次作业-sarning

sarningUID: 2215285

Issue 51
Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

ps: I can't fully agree with author's claim because it is impossible that vastly different intention and interest of each student be satiated by educational system that only have limited resource and the number of teachers.

a. Admittedly, current schools except colleges and university basically are not designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.
b. Education's responsibility for elementary student is not to completely meet interests of each student but to impart them with fundamental knowledge of science and humanities such as arithmetic, language skills and course of ethics.
c. College students should have sufficient opportunities and appropriate environment that are designed to meet their interest.

As speaker's allegation, will education be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student? Can you imagine that each student in any school can choose his most favorite courses and escape the one he hates? As my observation, I can't fully agree with speaker's claim because of some compelling argument.

Nowadays many elementary and high schools are not designed to fully meet students' interest as speaker's recommendation. All of these students get some compulsory courses and they have to pass the exam in the end of the semester. Although we all known that interest can impulse student’s learning process with more effectiveness, lots of schools still arrange compulsory courses in spite of hatred of some students. Comparatively, colleges are flexible schools in which a student can choose the major he likes and decide about the direction of his research and there are many advanced facilities in favor of his favorite field. Why do so many differences between two subsystems of education exist?  Is college education more effective than elementary and middle education?  In my opinion, there are three branches for solve the questions above.

In the first place, the fact that elementary and middle schools have huge number of students so many times than the number of college students results in such a great difference that it is impossible for education system to satiate vastly different intention and interest of each student because of its limited resource and the small number of teachers. Apparently, the ratio of teachers and students is much more higher in colleges than it in other schools and colleges also possess better hardware condition. Resource advantage enable college to contain many departments in which interested, keen students also can choose his favorite direction of research. Based on these facts I can give a conclusion that resource arrangement determines the ability of a school meeting the individual needs and interests of each student.

In the second place, education's responsibility for elementary and middle school's student is not to completely meet interests of each student but to impart them fundamental knowledge of science and humanities such as arithmetic, language skills and course of ethics. If an elementary student wildly completely devotes himself in the field he is very interested in he will lack indispensable fundamental skills needed by society that can be learned in school and this would prevent him from becoming a reasonable and productive citizen. So elementary and middle schools have to compel its graduates to accomplish a great deal of basic courses and hence they can be qualified with the social citizenship or entry of higher grade.

In the third place, although college may be more effective than elementary and mediate school, precollege   education is its necessary precondition. Generally, college students have gone through elementary and middle education that give them solid base of knowledge promise the entry into college. Therefore, in a suitable environment like college they can concentrate on the field that they interest in and so many advantages are in favor of their succeed. Student logically has better performance in college integrated with successful elementary and high education.

To sum up, from the point of view of reality and elementary education, author's assert appears some extent of arbitrariness. Whether education completely meets the individual needs and interest of each student should be decided by the stage of education.

杏林有情天UID: 2247728

Issue 51
Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

ps: I can't fully agree with author's claim because it is impossible that vastly different intention and interest of each student be satiated by educational system that only have limited resource and the number of teachers.

a. Admittedly, current schools except colleges and university basically are not designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.
b. Education's responsibility for elementary student is not to completely meet interests of each student but to impart them with fundamental knowledge of science and humanities such as arithmetic, language skills and course of ethics.
c. College students should have sufficient opportunities and appropriate environment that are designed to meet their interest.

As speaker's allegation, will education be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student? Can you imagine that each student in any school can choose his/her most favorite courses and escape from the one he/she hates? As my observation, I can't fully agree with speaker's claim because of some compelling argument.
最好不要ARGUMENT这个词，避免ETS认为你把ISSUE 写成AUGUMENT；虽然在开头点明了自己的态度，但是并未概括地说出哪不同意，哪同意，这样开头更清楚饱满。

Nowadays many elementary-middle and high schools are not designed to fully meet students' interest as speaker's recommendation. All of these students get some compulsory courses and they have to pass the exams  in the end of the semester. Although we all known that interest can impulse student’s learning process with more effectiveness,-more effectively  lots of schools still arrange compulsory courses in spite of hatred of some students. Comparatively, colleges are flexible schools-去掉SCHOOL in which a-去掉A student can choose the major he/SHE likes and decide about the direction of his/HER research and there are many advanced facilities in favor of his/HER favorite field. Why do so many differences between two subsystems of education exist?  Is college education more effective than elementary and middle education?  In my opinion, there are three branches for solve the questions above.

In the first place, the fact that elementary and middle schools have huge number of students so many times than the number of college students results in such a great difference that it is impossible for education system to satiate vastly different intention and interest of each student because of its limited resource and the small number of teachers. Apparently, the ratio of teachers and students is much more higher in colleges than it in other schools and colleges also possess better hardware condition. Resource advantage enable college to contain many departments in which interested, keen students also can choose his favorite direction of research. Based on these facts I can give a conclusion that resource arrangement determines the ability of a school meeting the individual needs and interests of each student.

In the second place, education's responsibility for elementary and middle school's student is not to completely meet interests of each student but to impart them fundamental knowledge of science and humanities such as arithmetic, language skills and course of ethics. If an elementary student wildly completely devotes himself in the field he is very interested in he will lack indispensable fundamental skills needed by society that can be learned in school and this would prevent him from becoming a reasonable and productive citizen. So elementary and middle schools have to compel its graduates to accomplish a great deal of basic courses and hence they can be qualified with the social citizenship or entry of higher grade.

In the third place, although college may be more effective than elementary and mediate school, precollege   education is its necessary precondition. Generally, college students have gone through elementary and middle education that give them solid base of knowledge promise the entry into college. Therefore, in a suitable environment like college they can concentrate on the field that they interest in and so many advantages are in favor of their succeed. Student logically has better performance in college integrated with successful elementary and high education.

To sum up, from the point of view of reality and elementary education, author's assert appears some extent of arbitrariness. Whether education completely meets the individual needs and interest of each student should be decided by the stage of education.

我看到底，已经不敢给你再改什么了，因为不是很确定是不是可以这么写，你议论了为什么中小学生不能象大学生那样自由地选择学习方向，他们应该怎样做可以提高学习兴趣，说实在的，在我看来，你过多的强调了这一方面，真的有些ARGUMENT之嫌，但是，我因为没有读到过你这种形式的范文，所以也不是很肯定，你看看是不是可以根据别人的提纲改改，或者就是坚持自己的风格，这也不是不可以，我认识的一个学长就是很有自我风格，考作文时分数还不错。
但是一定要注意，当你想泛指一个人时，一定要HE/SHE，HIS/HER ，在新东方上课时，老师特意强调的。

[ 本帖最后由 杏林有情天 于 2006-10-24 23:10 编辑 ]