- 最后登录
- 2007-9-8
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 265
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-2-20
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 150
- UID
- 2189586

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 265
- 注册时间
- 2006-2-20
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
"It is unfortunate that today's educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators' duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty tostudy what is presented to them."
The statement above conceals intesting(拼写错误) connotations far above curriculum development. Issues of classroom control and development of scholarly talents are at stake, not simply a debate over which books are acceptable or over revisionist histories.(简单陈述题目隐含的信息,转而直奔主题)
The statement itself is a bit misleading in that in my experience, student control over curriculum hardly existed.(该句似乎有语法错误,两个完整句子用逗号连接) Each year, there were certain course offerings made available, and students were to choose from those offerings, of course bearing in mind requirements for graduation set forth by the administration.On a classroom level, the immediate, initial material may have been somewhat directed by the students, but this was a part of the process allowed by the teacher/professor in order to gain the interest and attention of the students. However(转折), too much of any one thing becomes problematic;letting students set the curriculum, as with(多余) letting students choose and design their own major in college, serves ultimately to dilute the quality of the educational experience unless a single advisor can devote significant amounts of time to the individual student. This amount of time, or even the expense to the student of this individual attention, seem to indicate that resources would be better allocated elsewhere.(论证了让学生自主对课程进行选择的不可行性)
Of course, any school in which the students decide "what goes" is bound to have problems controlling students. Once the educators, be they administrators or teachers, are under the control of students, even a democratic situation would be like holding royalty acountable to the mob. Presently, students hear for hours that they should not forget to use a condom in the heat of the moment, and educators think the message gets through, while half the kids can't even remember to bring a pencil to class. Students go to school not to simply learn the Pythagorean theorem, but to learn direction and receive guidance. This cannot occur when students are in charge, and standards, already hard to find in America's contemporary public schools, will become unenforceable. If students dictate and administrators do, students will never learn academic responsibility, and if they can't be held accountable for homework, what other responsibilities will they avoid when they get older?(起先几个事例更明确的说明学生自主权的不可行性。进而提出课程学习不是教育的首要目的,正确的引导是关键)
But in another sense, teachers and students do exist in a partnership of sorts. Teachers are there to satisfy the needs of the student, and the student, while perhaps not being the most experienced/ knowledgeable person on what his/her needs actually are (versus wants), at least should be afforded some say. In addition, we must remember what the purpose of education is, and that there are different levels of education.(话锋一转,表明立场,老师可以和学生合作共同来完成对学生的教育。In addition又引出下面的段落。过渡段承上启下)
In high school, the focus is not so much on learning actual material. The focus is on developing study habits, and on social interaction. The best secondary schools promote an environment in which individual creativity and pacing can be developed, where students are taught to think on their own, and learn to debate and argue in a scholarly way, through writing and other formal methods of discourse. Group collaboration and interpersonal skills are developed and honed. The actual details of what is studied and tested is of less importance. Whether a student reads Maya Angelou, or Yeats, or Euripides essentially is beside the point as long as a student's mind is cultivated, not just their ability to record and recite. What is important is that secondary students develop and grow in the hands of the professionals.The secondary educational experience is designed to prepare a student for college. It is in college where the individual learns to examine the world and how it works, and the individual's place in it.(提出各个时期教育的目标应该是什么)
As for duty, it is the educators' duty not simply to determine the curriculum, but to present it effectively. They cannot half-heartedly paint it on the blackboard, they must enliven it and actually teach. Hard work must be lauded, while freeloaders are punished. These are the duties of teachers, and the duty of the students is not just to learn or study, but to grow. An independent mind is what students need, and that mind has to be in a position to want and be able to question beyond the material presented, not simply to question its legitimacy. That distinction, though subtle, is the difference between letting the students follow a self-destructive course of premature self-determination on the one hand , and permitting on the other hand the fostering of great talents through a cooperative, mentoring relationship.(最后结论,教育者不仅仅应该确定课程,而且应该用心教。最后一句点出学生的职责,更是点睛之作。)
全文虽然没有采取传统的一二三式的标志词,但结构依然清晰,行文流畅,逻辑清晰。 |
|