- 最后登录
- 2009-7-26
- 在线时间
- 51 小时
- 寄托币
- 622
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-12-29
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 483
- UID
- 2287893
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 622
- 注册时间
- 2006-12-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
批改
Laws and regulations are set up along with entrenchment(堑壕?在这里代表什么意思) of a government serving as a means to control the country. (这句话说的没错,但是第一段一定要表达自己的观点,而且要切合题目,你这里面完全没有题目里面所提及的just law and unjust law,我想这是不好的,应该多看看北美范文,看看地道的表达)
Laws are the rule(rules) around our lives that everybody has to follow. Laws formulate that which behaviors are right, and which are wrong and need(用must好) to be forbidden. Laws protect the civil rights, and save(keep) human far away from the danger. Laws also encourage the citizens who do well to our society. Laws punish crime. Laws beat all kinds behaviors which break the laws and(在加一个which比较清楚,要不可能被误解成Laws hurt our societ) hurt our society. In a word, the laws are made to help to maintain a peaceful, orderly, relatively stable society(这句话写的好).
As a citizen, the most normal way to do with it(law) is (to) obey it, and (to) follow it, and (to)judge our action through it. Because in most people’s opinion, laws means right, everyone should follow it but not disobey it. Of course, the most laws are just, and they are equal to every individual. The laws preserve morality, and guide for ones (one's) behavior. But anyway, there are some laws unjust, even it(there) is only a little.
Since laws are built up under the power of government, which represents the public interest whereas run by a few individuals, it is quite possible that laws are constituted (用词很准确) in the name of representing the majority while on the contrary in a few individual favor(这句话没看懂,while连接的应该是两个意义相反的句子,而且你也写了on the contrary ,怎么后面就写了 in a few individual favor,这要象意义一样的,应该是hurt minority之类). Always they do not judge everyone equally. They are set to protect a few individual benefits. Of course it harms others’ right. For an instant(instance), several years ago, some laws are set for the national education. However, girls were not allows to go to study. What they can do is (to)do the housework. Obviously it is harm(hramful) to the women’s right, because the god creates the human (men and women)in equal, no matter men or women(去掉). So what can we do when we face the unjust laws?
When we face the unjust laws, we could not be mercy. We can not let them continue deprive our right, especially by the so-called laws. What we need to do is to get the rights which we should have. Face the unjust laws everyone has the very responsibility to resist them, protect our own right. So what can we do with it? How to against them?(到底是it 还是them) I do not think the violent resistance is good. We should(may) destroy by(去掉) law, by just law. We can collect the case that can justify the unjust laws are(to be ) unfair to everyone(这个词有些绝对哦).
So in sum(In sum), every individual should put out ones(his/her) opinions to the unjust laws, even every citizen could not reach an agreement on just or unjust.(结尾也要呼应前面和题目,说明什么样的法律我们obey,什么样的法律我们disobey)(注意一些在题目中的关键词,比如obey,unjust law等等)
总结一下咯:
总体来说段落之间衔接的还不错,有一定层次感
不过不足还是不少滴,呵呵,希望我的建议能给你一些帮助:
1.写文章一点要把题目审好,题目是两句话组成的,1)法律分just 和 unjust 2)我们遵守just law 我们反对unjust law
很清晰,那我们写文章的时候就要先说第一句,你赞成不,赞成就看第二句,你赞成不;要是第一句不赞成,就自己在对法律分一下类,然后不看第二句,按照自己的发挥,这个组长给我门的资料里面有,写文章之前应该对看看
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-437387-1-1.html
2.写文章前要打好提纲,这样才能做到明白的表述
3.正文的表述还是对的,说明了法律的作用,我们对正义法律的支持和对不公平法律的反对,并且提出了反对的一些方法.这些在开头和结尾是应该提一下的,显得文章就很紧凑了
4.再有请楼主把一些基本小语法看看哦,好象语法上的错误还是有不少
第一次写,大家都未免出很多错误,我就说这么多,希望你的文章越写越好
[ 本帖最后由 nujnujoahz 于 2007-1-7 08:32 编辑 ] |
|