Issue4--<0706G － CSMY作文互改小组-第6次作业>

meichengyuUID: 2121098

*4. No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. [2]
*4. 在任何一个学术研究领域，除非有领域之外的人带来他们的知识和经验，否则该领域就不能取得长足的进步。

态度：肯定

提纲：
1．  由古至今，任何时候任何领域的发展都离不开其他相关领域的协助。从博弈论在经济学中的广泛运用到空气动力学在汽车制造业中的重要地位，从同位素在考古学中的使用到X光在医学范围的巨大贡献，等等。所有这些数不清的例子无不证明了它们的发展是互相制约互相促进的！

2．  我们知道世界万物都是息息相关的，没有任何孤立存在的东西。学术领域也一样，如果没有数学和几何知识的介入，摩天大楼的设计者如何能够画出几百米高的建筑物的蓝图？！如果没有显微镜的发明，哪能看到DNA双螺旋的美丽结构？！如果所有的领域都孤立起来，世界还可能迈步向前吗？


The speaker claims that any area of study could not develop greatly without the help of other areas’ achievement and experience. In my point of view, I am inclined to support this kind of recommendation which can be substantiated by the following discussion.

To begin with, if we cast a look back to the history of human world, it is easy to find that any progress of study fields could not be separated from other relative fields’ influence. From the widely use of the game theory in economics to the predominant role of aerodynamics in manufacture of cars and airplanes, from the utilization of isotope in archeology to the huge contribution of X ray in medical world, etc. All of such countless exemplifications demonstrate the same truth that advancement in every field of study over the world has both effect of restrict and stimulus on each other. Without their progress and influence on each other step by step, no one could achieve any goal or even survive.

As we know, everything on earth is closely bound up. There is nothing isolated could live, including in the academic areas. Can you imagine how could those skyscrapers’ designers draw the blueprints of hundreds high buildings without the knowledge of mathematics and geometry? Can you imagine how could Watson and Crick find the beautiful spiral model of DNA without a microscope? Can you imagine how could Armstrong walk on the moon without the spaceship and rockets? Can you imagine how could the world move forward without the union of different areas of study? I believe the answer of us is the same, no, of cause.

Nobody lives in the vacuum and no fields of study are carried on in the vacuum either. After I was admitted to participate in a research group about Hp in the institute of Gastroenterology in one of the affiliated hospitals of my college, I found that most of the research methods and technology are with the help of other areas such as the immunology skills, molecular biological skills, anatomy and even radiology. Such instance is experienced by myself and is much persuasive, I think. If you are careful about the surroundings in your daily life, it is easy to discover examples as I showed, absolutely.

All in all, from what I mentioned in this issue, we could be comfortable to arrive to the conclusion that it is truth that no areas of study could make great progress without outsiders’ useful experience and knowledge, just as the author said.

solohanUID: 2279589

The speaker claims that any area of study could not develop greatly without the help of other areas’ achievement and experience. In my point of view, I am inclined to support this kind of recommendation which can be substantiated by the following discussion.
To begin with, if we cast a look back to the history of human world, it is easy to find that any progress of study fields could not be separated from other relative fields’ influence. From the widely use of the game theory in economics to the predominant role of aerodynamics in manufacture of cars and airplanes, from the utilization of isotope in archeology to the huge contribution of X ray in medical world, etc. All of such countless exemplifications demonstrate the same truth that advancement in every field of study over the world has both effect of restrict and stimulus on each other.没看懂这句。Each other指什么，这句话想表达什么意思 Without their progress and influence on each other step by step, no one could achieve any goal or even survive.这句话也是，不知道与主题有什么关系。而且整段都没有提到Outsider,也并没有阐述这段与全文中心的关系，显得很唐突，毕竟这并不是显而易见的
As we know, everything on earth is closely bound up. There is nothing isolated could live, including in the academic areas. Can you imagine how could those skyscrapers’ designers draw the blueprints of hundreds high buildings without the knowledge of mathematics and geometry? Can you imagine how could Watson and Crick find the beautiful spiral model of DNA without a microscope? Can you imagine how could Armstrong walk on the moon without the spaceship and rockets? Can you imagine how could the world move forward without the union of different areas of study? I believe the answer of us is the same, no, of cause.几个接连着的反问气势很强。但是缺乏论证，而且同上一段的问题相同，作者究竟在表达一个什么主题，读者恐怕并不明白
Nobody lives in the vacuum and no fields of study are carried on in the vacuum either. After I was admitted to participate in a research group about Hp in the institute of Gastroenterology in one of the affiliated hospitals of my college, I found that most of the research methods and technology are with the help of other areas such as the immunology skills, molecular biological skills, anatomy and even radiology. Such instance is experienced by myself and is much persuasive, I think. If you are careful about the surroundings in your daily life, it is easy to discover examples as I showed, absolutely.感觉例子太弱，太概括了，与其这样，不如换成论证
All in all, from what I mentioned in this issue, we could be comfortable to arrive to the conclusion that it is truth that no areas of study could make great progress without outsiders’ useful experience and knowledge, just as the author said. 前文都没有提到过outsider.多学科并不等于outsider,就算你觉得两者等同，那也该在文中阐述，否者就有点偷换概念的嫌疑了。

虽然说了这么多，但我自己才写得烂。为什么遇到好写的，显而易见的题目，反倒缺乏论证了呢？还得再补充补充，修改修改。欢迎继续讨论~