|
Inthis argument the author claims that thesales of Whirlwind(W) video games are likely to increase in the next fewmonths. To justify his claim, the author sites a recent survey of video-gameplayers, and W has introduced several video-games according to the survey withan extensive advertising campaign. However, I find several logical fallacies in this argument,which make it unpersuasive.
To begin with, the reliability of the recent survey is suspected. The authorunfairly deems the survey is representative of the general playersthat age from 10 to 25[10-25 years old]. However this is not necessarilythe case. Perhaps the participants of the survey arenot within the age-group from 10 to 25. Thus the result of the recentsurvey can not be representative of the video-game players aged 10 to 25[aged between 10 and 25]. Without considering these[this] possibilities, the author convinces me little.
In addition, the author rests on the assumption that the declining sales can bechanged by the introduction of new lifelike video games and its advertisingcampaign. Yet it may not necessarily be the situation. It is entirely possiblethat the former declining sales of W video games were mainly due to its extremely high price and poor management. Or perhaps thedeclining sales of video-game is primary due to the poor ability of theadvertising corporation that is also in charge of this advertising campaign,therefore the possibilities of changing declining sales is doubted. Withoutruling out these possible factors, the author can not convince us.[结尾比较空,应点明如果是这些原因,下降趋势不会改观]
Finally, the author hastily generalizes that the salesof W video games are most probable to increase remarkably in the next fewmonths. Nevertheless, without consideringsome other video-game corporations that also introduce similar lifelike videogames and may sell them in a lower price, the author's prediction may nothappen. Moreover, if the price of the video games is so high that seldom canplayers afford or the whole economic situation is declining, the author can notsimply draw this conclusion.[同样是结尾,空洞的套话不如在段子中多添加一段分析的话]
To sum up, this argument is not persuasive as it stands.To make it more logically acceptable, we should know more information[具体化,令可additionally后面不写,要写就要清楚明白] about the participant players in the survey. Additionally,we need further information about the causeof the declining sales of W video games over the past two years.
模版已经很成熟了,再在分析上多下点功夫就perfect了~
fighting! ……^_^ |