Argument214 <Chasing For "6" Score 小组第一次作业>

rixiaohanUID: 2291600

In this analysis, the arguer claims that Parson City residents care more about public school education than Blue City residents do. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of Parson City typically budgets twice as much money per year as Blue City does for its public schools In addition, the arguer assumes that both cities have about the same number of residents This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.

First of all, the argument is based on a hasty generalization. According to the cited studies, Parson City budgets twice as much money per year as Blue City does for its public schools seems that Parson City residents care more about public school education than Blue City residents. This fact tells very little about what actual strategy the city government adopt when they decide how much to investe

In addition, the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that may influence budget decision. For instance, though both cities have about the same number of residents, the student numbers are truly needed to consider in budgets. And the taxes the government gets from residents may not similar. When people in Parson City have twice income than Blue City and the students number just as half as Blue City, then the condition is upset, so the author’s judgment seems so inconvincible that just deduce from budget.
   
Finally, the arguer overlooks other respects of evaluating if a government cares education. Only increase investement will not improve the quality of education. The government should make time inspections of schools for finding some potential problems in school and for inspecting if the investment is used for their education rather than other aspects. What’s more, arranging different school hold periodical communication also important.

To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the measurements or strategy used for establish of educative system.

chongxinlaiUID: 2235209

In this analysis, the arguer claims that Parson City residents care more about public school education than Blue City residents do. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of Parson City typically budgets twice as much money per year as Blue City does for its public schools In addition, the arguer assumes that both cities have about the same number of residents This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.标准开头了

First of all, the argument is based on a hasty generalization. According to the cited studies, Parson City budgets twice as much money per year as Blue City does for its public schools seems that Parson City residents care more about public school education than Blue City residents. This fact tells very little about what actual strategy the city government adopt when they decide how much to investefor example呢，展开呢？

In addition, the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that may influence budget decision. For instance, though both cities have about the same number of residents, the student numbers are truly needed to consider in budgets. And the taxes the government gets from residents may not similar. When people in Parson City have twice income than Blue City and the students number just as half as Blue City, tax多少有关教育么？疑问ingthen the condition is upset, so the author’s judgment seems so inconvincible that just deduce from budget.
   
Finally, the arguer overlooks other respects of evaluating if a government cares education. Only increase investment will not improve the quality of education. The government should 应不应该做不用管，做没做过是要考虑的make time inspections of schools for finding some potential problems in school and for inspecting if the investment is used for their education rather than other aspects. What’s more, arranging different school hold periodical communication also important.

To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the measurements or strategy used for establish of educative system.模版万岁，不过最好改改~

我的两篇,有时间帮我看看:)
Issue 51 :https://bbs.gter.net/thread-600531-1-1.html
Argument 214 :https://bbs.gter.net/thread-600754-1-1.html