寄托天下
查看: 1128|回复: 1

[a习作temp] ARGUMENT67 [076G飞跃小组]zengyouwen第3次作业 求拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
195
注册时间
2006-12-19
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2007-2-26 13:05:49 |显示全部楼层
TOPIC: ARGUMENT67 - The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a newspaper serving the villages of Castorville and Polluxton.

"Both the villages of Castorville and Polluxton have experienced sharp declines in the numbers of residents who pay property taxes. To save money and improve service, the two villages recently merged their once separate garbage collection departments into a single department located in Castorville, and the new department has reported few complaints about its service. Last year the library in Polluxton had 20 percent fewer users than during the previous year. It follows that we should now further economize and improve service, as we did with garbage collection, by closing the library in Polluxton and using the library in Castorville to serve both villages."
WORDS: 428          TIME: 上午 12:29:53          DATE: 2007-2-26
提纲
1.       很少的抱怨并不说明不抱怨的人对此很满意
2.       图书馆和垃圾场的错误类比,垃圾场人们可以忍受,但是图书馆未必
3.       作者未就叫物业财产税的下降原因进行调查而进行了这一些举措是否合适
In this letter the author advocates that we should close the library in Polluxton for the decline of readers and also for the less property taxes the residents paid for the two villages named Castorville and Polluxton as the merge of a garbage collection . The other reason for close the library is to save money and improve service.  But the author fails for the fallacies created in this letter.

First, the few complaints about its service does not mean the service have been improved. The complained people may the one who cannot withstand the bad service and inconvenience of closing the garbage collection, but most of the people who was still discontent with this did not give his opinion for certain kind of reasons. How can it come out that the people are content with this service and inconvenience created by this for they have to go to another village to disposal his garbage. Thus the data provides no evidence to make the actions of the authority reasonable.

Second, the false analogy of treating the library the same as the garbage collection. If the most people in the Polluxton like reading, and they often go to the library and just last year the service declined and they amount of people also dropped, but the authority did not show any interest to find out the reason that made the difference of the readers' number, and just analogy that with the garbage collection, thus make a big mistake to close the library in Polluxton just in the excuse of improving service and saving money, which might cause a strong against opinion come out.

Third, the reason for the declines in the numbers of residents who pay property taxes is not sufficient to make it close the garbage collection and library. The same ,the authority fails to find out other possibilities which might lead to the declines of paying property taxes, which might be the tax-rate be set to high that only a small group of people could afford and make this decline. In addition the average property tax around the two villages should be found to give a reference for setting the tax-rate, thus may make it considerate for the people and may solve this problem, but not just close the public service ulitities and which is concerning the citizen's daily lives.

In sum, this argument suffers from several weak points as mentioned above that it fails to get to the conclusion that a close of a library in Castorvilee will be reasonable. To make it more convincing causes and effective solution should be set forth.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
1
寄托币
888
注册时间
2006-7-22
精华
0
帖子
7
发表于 2007-2-27 10:16:12 |显示全部楼层
久等了哦
1.       很少的抱怨并不说明不抱怨的人对此很满意
2.       图书馆和垃圾场的错误类比,垃圾场人们可以忍受,但是图书馆未必(我觉得是一定的哈)
3.       作者未就叫物业财产税的下降原因进行调查而进行了这一些举措是否合适
In this letter the author advocates that we should close the library in Polluxton for the decline of readers and also for the less property taxes the residents paid for the two villages named Castorville and Polluxton as the merge of a garbage collection . The other reason for close the library is to save money and improve service.  But the author fails for the fallacies created in this letter.

First, the few complaints about its service does(do ??) not mean the service have been improved. The complained people may the one who cannot withstand the bad service and inconvenience of closing the garbage collection, but most of the people who was still discontent with this did not give his opinion for certain kind of reasons. How can it come out that the people are content with this service and inconvenience created by this for they have to go to another village to disposal his garbage. (不能有问题不答哦,要知道老米思维不行的)Thus the data provides no evidence to make the actions of the authority reasonable.

Second, the false analogy of treating the library the same as the garbage collection(好像有语法错误哦). If the most people in the Polluxton like reading, and they often go to the library and just last year the service declined and they amount of people(原谅我,没看懂。。。) also dropped, but the authority(??) did not show any interest to find out the reason that made the difference of the readers' number, and just analogy that with the garbage collection, thus make a big mistake to close the library in Polluxton just in the excuse of improving service and saving money, which might cause a strong against opinion come out(cause  come out 不能并存,哈哈,一山不容二虎).

Third, the reason for the declines in the numbers of residents who pay property taxes is not sufficient to make it close the garbage collection and library. The same ,the authority fails to find out other possibilities which might lead to the declines of paying property taxes, which might be the tax-rate be set to high that only a small group of people could afford and make this decline. In addition the average property tax around the two villages should be found to give a reference for setting the tax-rate, thus may make it considerate for the people and may solve this problem, but not just close the public service ulitities and which is concerning the citizen's daily lives.

In sum, this argument suffers from several weak points as mentioned above that it fails to get to the conclusion that a close of a library in Castorvilee will be reasonable. To make it more convincing causes and effective solution should be set forth.(最好在来点建设意见)

[ 本帖最后由 Skysijie 于 2007-2-27 14:15 编辑 ]
相同重量的一只鸡和一只兔子,问:谁的肉比较多??

使用道具 举报

RE: ARGUMENT67 [076G飞跃小组]zengyouwen第3次作业 求拍 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ARGUMENT67 [076G飞跃小组]zengyouwen第3次作业 求拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-616315-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部