issue69 [076G飞跃小组]joyce8512第四次作业

joyce8512UID: 2263806

TOPIC: ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
结论型提纲：
正负负。
1．科学发展需要自由，因此政府不该过度限制。
例子：清朝中国限制多了，导致科技落后。
2．资金有限，需要政府选择扶持一些有意义的科研。
3．有些科研对社会发展不利，要限制。例子：克隆。
WORDS: 540          TIME: 1:05:51          DATE: 2007-3-1

Does it necessary for government to place restrictions on scientific research and development? There seems to be confusion about this question. The speaker claims that government should restrict scientific research as little as possible. From my perspective, it is true that the research and growing of science to some extent need a free environment; however, government should assume the obligation to confine scientific research within a certain scope in order to make the best advantage of the fruit of science.

Admittedly, the free atmosphere is fundamental to the development of science just like air to human beings. Without such a favorable condition, hardly can scientists make any original and significant creations which might be beneficial to the improvement of people and society as a whole. Here is a proper example to support my assertion. In the ancient times, China is developed in the scientific area in the world as a result of the "Four Great Inventions". However, after Qing Dynasty, government implemented an extremely strict restriction on scientific creations, which directly lead to the lag of Chinese science inventions and even the whole nation. On the contrary, western countries were carrying out an almost uncontrolled system with respect to the scientific research and development which is responsible for the dramatic success of these countries. For that case, it seems clear that scientists demand a unrestricted environment to carry out their research--the result of which might be progress to the society.

However, on the other hand, a totally free policy as for the scientific research is unrealistic and unfeasible. As we know, the amount of funds a government possesses is limited while the quantity of scientific research is unlimited. Therefore, government should choose the most valuable research and then afford sufficient budget to them, just as what every taxpayer expects. For example, in the modern time, people are in face of the short of energy sources.  So, if a research target to find or produce new kind of energy sources, it should have the priority to gain the funds from government since the fruit of this research will solve the urgent problem of society and bring it forward as well. In short, government should decide which sort of research to be fund while restrict the other kinds.

In addition, certain scientific research will bring potential jeopardize to the society if it is not confined well, which is neglected by the speaker. Simply put the genetic clone as an example, if there are no restrictions about it at all, what will happen in the world? There might be hundreds of Mozart, Lincoln, or Hitler existing in the same field, which will produce ethical and social problems, or even make our society as a chaos. Thus, to avoid such phenomena, is it necessary for government to place some restrictions on the scientific research and development which might threaten the stability and improvement of society.

All in all, in my point of view, although scientists need the free atmosphere to carry out their research; however, it is essential for government to place restriction on certain scientific research and development. Without the restriction, our society will at the threshold of becoming dangerous and chaotic, which is adverse to the original purpose of scientific research themselves.

davidcaoUID: 2307241

TOPIC: ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
结论型提纲：
正负负。
1．科学发展需要自由，因此政府不该过度限制。
例子：清朝中国限制多了，导致科技落后。
2．资金有限，需要政府选择扶持一些有意义的科研。
3．有些科研对社会发展不利，要限制。例子：克隆。
WORDS: 540          TIME: 1:05:51          DATE: 2007-3-1

Does it necessary for government to place restrictions on scientific research and development? There seems to be confusion about this question. The speaker claims that government should restrict scientific research as little as possible. From my perspective, it is true that the research and growing of science to some extent need a free environment; however, government should assume the obligation to confine scientific research within a certain scope in order to make the best advantage of the fruit of science.

Admittedly, the free atmosphere is fundamental to the development of science just like air to human beings. Without such a favorable condition, hardly can scientists make any original and significant creations which might be beneficial to the improvement of people and society as a whole. Here is a proper example to support my assertion. In the ancient times, China is developed in the scientific area in the world as a result of the "Four Great Inventions"（难道古代中国就是因为四大发明而变为发达的吗?这个逻辑上有问题啊）. However, after Qing Dynasty, government implemented an extremely strict restriction on scientific creations, which directly lead(led) to the lag of Chinese science inventions and even the whole nation. On the contrary, western countries were carrying out an almost uncontrolled system with respect to the scientific research and development which is responsible for the dramatic success of these countries. For that case, it seems clear that scientists demand a unrestricted environment to carry out their research--the result of which might be progress(progress能这样用吗？我不知道的) to the society.

However, on the other hand, a totally free policy as for the scientific research is unrealistic and unfeasible. As we know, the amount of funds a government possesses is limited while the quantity of scientific research is unlimited. Therefore, government should choose the most valuable research(es) and then afford sufficient budget to them(them 和前面的research不一致）, just as what every taxpayer expects. For example, in the modern time, people are in face of the short(age) of energy sources.  So, if a research target(s) to find or produce new kind of energy (re)sources(这里按你的理解应该是找到新能源resource而不是能量的源头source吧）, it should have the priority to gain the funds from government since the fruit of this research will solve the urgent problem of society and bring it forward as well（bring it forward这句好像有些多余）. In short, government should decide which sort of research to be fund while restrict the other kinds.

In addition, certain scientific research will bring potential jeopardize(jeopardies) to the society if it is not confined well, which is neglected by the speaker. Simply put the genetic clone as an example, if there are no restrictions about it at all, what will (would)happen in the world? There might be hundreds of Mozart, Lincoln, or Hitler existing in the same field, which will produce ethical and social problems, or even make our society as a chaos. Thus, to avoid such phenomena, is it (it is)necessary for government to place some restrictions on the scientific research and development which might threaten the stability and improvement of society.

All in all, in my point of view, although scientists need the free atmosphere to carry out their research; however, it is essential for government to place restrictions on certain scientific research and development. Without the restriction, our society will at the threshold of becoming dangerous and chaotic, which is adverse to the original purpose of scientific research themselves(这个themselves是什么意思啊？能解释一下吗？）
小拽姐姐，小弟不才，看不出大的问题出来，只帮你找了些常见的语法错误，也不知准不准确啊，总体上觉得写得还不错的。祝你考出好成绩！！！

joyce8512UID: 2263806

呀~你来啦:loveliness: :loveliness:
那个能源我用金山查的是energy sources，我再看看去~
你更要加油哦！
明天考场上rp爆发一下，bless you!

joyce8512UID: 2263806

恩~那个progress 要改成promote/accelerate
能源也改成energy resources~
四大发明那个我也改成促进好了~
谢谢你发现这些问题！！！:loveliness:

harrisleeUID: 2275909

感觉楼主第3段有点跑，谈到了资源合理利用从而需要限制经费，不太能够理解。
个人觉得第一段如果要包含下面你要谈的问题，最好都先提一下，楼主第一段就没有提到资源合理利用的，但是提纲里却有，是不是应该说一下呢？
个人一点看法和建议。

dracuulaUID: 2116076

同意ls，开头段都应该大略带到下面要谈的内容