Issu184【07-10G Superstar大帖】第12次作业 by Huaxinluobo

huaxinluoboUID: 2326780

The speaker asserts that we learn through direct experience and steps on to claim that accepting a theory without experience equal to learning nothing. After reflection I partially agree with it. While I concede experiencing is crucial in the process of acquiring new knowledge and skills, it is too extreme to conclude that without experience we can not really learn principles and theories.

Admittedly, at many times experience serves as the primary way by which we learn new knowledge and skills beyond classrooms where formal education takes place. Look back to the time when we are kids when we learn to eat, to walk, to run, to speak, there is only one method we learn those skills—observation and imitation, or in other words, direct experience. Even as times passes, we maintain other means of learning like thinking, reasoning, deducing, the significance of learning by experience is not diminished and in contrary, be enhanced. It is hard to imagine that one can learn to drive without sating in a car and driving around; a music student can learn to play certain instrument without getting one; a football layman can grow to be an excellent player without running in fields; a future programmer can master software without sating behind a computer for years. All these can not be achieved without experience, to learn through words on books is almost to learning nothing, as the speaker says.

When it comes to systemic education the situation changes. In the learning of some natural sciences like science like physics, biology, chemistry and so forth, without any experience we can still learn, understand and master those theories and principles. For example, even without doing experiments, students can acquire those theories by former physical scientist like Galileo, Newton, Copernicus; students studying biology can acknowledge the development of theory of evolution and genetics; students who major in chemistry can know the character of elements and molecules. The primary reason for this lies in the ability of logical thinking only owned by human, which distinguish us from other animals. Think about the process of learning in field of physics, initially we acquire those basic principles like law of inertia, mass, speed, reflection, relativity, etc. then with help of these theories we learn more complex and subtle theories, as well as how to justify them logically and mathematically. We can learn this merely by thinking, without assistance of experience, especially the theories about space and planets where no direct experience can be got.

However, it is tempting to ignore the benefit of experience when we emphasis on theory learning based on thinking. In fact, although not indispensable, experience holds some advantages in systemic learning I mentioned above. Of the advantages I consider most significant is that experience can promote the understanding of theories and make learning more efficient. Operation and observation in library may help student get a better sight of theories, and meanwhile, in less time. Simple experiments in courses and school labs have been proved to effectively increase the quality of learning in nature sciences. Students learn deeper and faster about the structure of cells in labs with microscopes than merely looking pictures in books. Thus, while thinking takes priority, experience can still functions in learning of pure theories.

To sum up, the speaker’s assertion has merit insofar as in daily learning and in formal education of pure knowledge, experience can only servers as a assistant while logical thinking plays the central role in learning.

学野UID: 2155973

The speaker asserts that we learn through direct experience and steps on to claim that accepting a theory without experience equal to learning nothing. After reflection I partially agree with it. While I concede experiencing is crucial in the process of acquiring new knowledge and skills, it is too extreme to conclude that without experience we can not really learn principles and theories.

Admittedly, at many times In most cases experience serves as the primary way by which we learn new knowledge and skills beyond classrooms where formal education takes place. Look back to the time when we are kids when we learn to eat, to walk, to run, to speak,两个when连在一起怪怪的 there is only one method we learn those skills—observation and imitation, or in other words, direct experience. Even as times passes, we maintain other means of learning like thinking, reasoning, deducing, the significance of learning by experience is not diminished and in contrary, be enhanced.这句不错！ It is hard to imagine that one can learn to drive without sating sitting in a car and driving around; a music student can learn to play certain instrument without getting one; a football layman can grow to be an excellent player without running in fields; a future programmer can master software without sating behind a computer for years. 例子生动！All these can not be achieved without experience, to learn through words on books is almost to learning nothing, as the speaker says.

When it comes to systemic education the situation changes. In the learning of some natural sciences like science ？？like physics, biology, chemistry and so forth, without any experience we can still learn, understand and master those theories and principles. For example, even without doing experiments, students can acquire those theories by former physical scientist like Galileo, Newton, Copernicus; students studying biology can acknowledge the development of theory of evolution and genetics; students who major in chemistry can know the character of elements and molecules. The primary reason for this lies in the ability of logical thinking only owned by human, which distinguish us from other animals. Think about the process of learning in field of physics, initially we acquire those basic principles like law of inertia, mass, speed, reflection, relativity, etc. then with help of these theories we learn more complex and subtle theories, as well as how to justify them logically and mathematically. We can learn this merely by thinking, without assistance of experience, especially the theories about space and planets where no direct experience can be got. 非常不错的说~

However, it is tempting to ignore the benefit of experience when we emphasis on theory learning based on thinking. In fact, although not indispensable, experience holds some advantages in systemic learning I mentioned above. Of the advantages I consider most significant is that experience can promote the understanding of theories and make learning more efficient. Operation and observation in library may help student get a better sight of theories, and meanwhile, in less time. Simple experiments in courses and school labs have been proved to effectively increase the quality of learning in nature sciences. Students learn deeper and faster about the structure of cells in labs with microscopes than merely looking pictures in books. Thus, while thinking takes priority, experience can still functions in learning of pure theories.还是在说experiments 的必要性阿~

To sum up, the speaker’s assertion has merit insofar as in daily learning and in formal education of pure knowledge, experience can only servers as a assistant while logical thinking plays the central role in learning.
全篇对于experiment的论述比较多，好像重点还是说experiment的必要性，虽然为了表现总体完整性，但是对于总论点就有点失衡了，结尾提到experiment serves as a assistance 以及 logical thinking的重要性，但是只有第二个body提到了，第三个body 最好能再提一下logical thinking 的核心位置 以及experiment的辅助作用，只有两者combine 才能更好的学习
语言很不错！呵呵，学习中~尤其是例子！