issue185 [0806G-desperado小组]第二次作业by pmsf

流淌的月光UID: 2414493

题目
185 "Scandals -- whether in politics, academia, or other areas -- can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways
that no speaker or reformer ever could."  
185． 丑闻，不管是政治、学术还是其他领域，都是有用的。它们能吸引人们的注意力，而使我们聚焦于问题，以一种演讲者和改革家都做不
到的方式。

提纲
1 一方面丑闻可以吸引我们的注意力,让我们认识到存在的问题上,所以是必要的.
2 另一方面丑闻分散了我们的注意力,不能真正解决问题,并且干扰了很多人正常的去工作,另外揭发丑闻所花费的人力、物力、财力也是十分巨
大的.

正文
I agree with the speaker's assertion that scandals can be useful in many areas. After all, they focus our attention on problems which are usually neglected by us. However, scandals always take some troubles to us, which sometimes are not a good
thing.

On the one hand, I concede that the speaker has realized the good influence of scandals, which disclose the covered  squalidity and help us to pay attention to some unknown problems. We all know the Nixon's Watergate Affair which is a well-known political scandal. Without scandals, the public could not realize anything to the political problems.  Another example is the scandal of football corruption in china, which is called "Black Whistle". Now people pay much attention to it. In the economic realm, a good example is the Anron scandal which was unimaginable to all of us. Thus, the problems of financial system in the world are well considered by the public. It is extraordinary usual that a scandal relates with waste of large amount of public resources. The resources would be more beneficial to the world if they could be spent in helping the sick children in the Africa or otherwise be used for addressing the problems of the environment pollution and unemployment in America.

On the second hand, scandals may also distract us from substaintial problems which are related, they should not be exaggerated. When a scandal is uncovered to the public, people do not focus on genesis of the scandal, but they pay more attention to the scandal itself. Thus, this can not solve the real problem. What's more, many people's work will be disrupted or even delayed by the scandal. In such a way, the scandal does not help us, but has detrimental effect to us. In the end, we will spend a lot of resources to reveal scandals, sometimes it need more resources than the scandal's bad influence to the society. So we have to think about the significance deeply before we decide to reveal it, after all, changing the improper system behind the scandal is more significative to us.

To sum up, without scandals, we sometimes do not know that we still have problems which need to solve. But superfluous attention to scandals would be detrimental, because solving the problems behind the scandal is more important than the scandal itself. We have our own work to do which should not be disrupted by scandals. Thus, a balance between them is  very crucial .

summer330UID: 2175256

提纲
1 一方面丑闻可以吸引我们的注意力,让我们认识到存在的问题上,所以是必要的.
2 另一方面丑闻分散了我们的注意力,不能真正解决问题,并且干扰了很多人正常的去工作,另外揭发丑闻所花费的人力、物力、财力也是十分巨
大的.

正文
I agree with the speaker's assertion that scandals can be useful in many areas. After all, they focus our attention on problems which are usually neglected by us. However, scandals always take some troubles to us, which sometimes are not a good
thing.

On the one hand, I concede that the speaker has realized the good(positive) influence of scandals, which disclose the covered  squalidity and help us to pay attention to some unknown problems. We all know the Nixon's Watergate Affair(scandal) which is a well-known political scandal. Without scandals, the public could not realize anything to the political problems.  Another example is the scandal of football corruption in china, which is called "Black Whistle".(黑哨好像不是这么说，看过一个帖子上介绍过，找到告诉你) Now people pay much attention to it. In the economic realm, a good example is the Anron scandal which was unimaginable to all of us. Thus, the problems of financial system in the world are well considered by the public. It is extraordinary(_narily) usual(common) that a scandal relates with waste of large amount of public resources. The resources would be more beneficial to the world if they could be spent in helping the sick children in the Africa or otherwise be used for addressing the problems of the environment pollution and unemployment in America.

On the second hand, scandals may also distract us from substaintial problems which are related, they should not be exaggerated. When a scandal is uncovered to the public, people do not focus on genesis of the scandal, but they pay more attention to the scandal itself. Thus, this can not solve the real problem. What's more, many people's work will be disrupted or even delayed by the scandal. In such a (this) way, the scandal does not help us, but has detrimental effect to us. In the end, we will spend a lot of resources to reveal scandals, sometimes it need more resources than the scandal's bad influence to the society. So we have to think about the significance deeply before we decide to reveal it, after all, changing the improper system behind the scandal is more significative(significant) to us.

To sum up, without scandals, we sometimes do not know that we still have problems which need to solve. But superfluous attention to scandals would be detrimental, because solving the problems behind the scandal is more important than the scandal itself. We have our own work to do which should not be disrupted by scandals. Thus, a balance between them is  very crucial .

PursueDreamUID: 2426799

I agree with the speaker's assertion that scandals can be useful in many areas. After all, they focus our attention on problems which are usually neglected by us. However, scandals always take some troubles to us, which sometimes are not a good thing. On the one hand, I concede that the speaker has realized the good influence of scandals, which disclose the covered  squalidity and help us to pay attention to some unknown problems. We all know the Nixon's Watergate Affair which is a well-known political scandal. Without scandals, the public could not realize anything to the political problems.  Another example is the scandal of football corruption in china, which is called "Black Whistle". Now people pay much attention to it. In the economic realm, a good example is the Anron scandal which was(is) unimaginable to all of us. Thus, the problems of financial system in the world are well considered by the public. It is extraordinary usual that a scandal relates with waste of large amount of(a large amount of/large amounts of?) public resources. The resources would be more beneficial to the world if they could be spent in helping the sick children in the(去掉the?) Africa or otherwise be used for addressing the problems of the environment pollution and unemployment in America. On the second hand, scandals may also distract us from substaintial problems which are related, they should not be exaggerated(这句话是不是有点问题，两个主语？). When a scandal is uncovered(exposured?更好，曝光) to the public, people do not focus on genesis of the scandal, but they pay more attention to the scandal itself. Thus, this can not solve the real problem. What's more, many people's work will be disrupted or even delayed by the scandal. In such a way, the scandal does not help us, but has detrimental effect to us. In the end, we will spend a lot of resources to reveal(in revealing?) scandals, sometimes it need more resources than the scandal's bad influence to the society. So we have to think about the significance deeply before we decide to reveal it, after all, changing the improper system behind the scandal is more significative to us.To sum up, without scandals, we sometimes do not know that we still have problems which need to solve(need to be solved?). But superfluous attention to scandals would be detrimental, because solving the problems behind the scandal is more important than the scandal itself. We have our own work to do which should not be disrupted by scandals. Thus, a balance between them is  very crucial .


昨天没有帮你改，不好意思啊。修改部分仅供参考！！！

PursueDreamUID: 2426799

I agree with the speaker's assertion that scandals can be useful in many areas. After all, they focus our attention on problems which are usually neglected by us. However, scandals always take some troubles to us, which sometimes are not a good thing.
On the one hand, I concede that the speaker has realized the good influence of scandals, which disclose the covered  squalidity and help us to pay attention to some unknown problems. We all know the Nixon's Watergate Affair which is a well-known political scandal. Without scandals, the public could not realize anything to the political problems.  Another example is the scandal of football corruption in china, which is called "Black Whistle". Now people pay much attention to it. In the economic realm, a good example is the Anron scandal which was(is) unimaginable to all of us. Thus, the problems of financial system in the world are well considered by the public. It is extraordinary usual that a scandal relates with waste of large amount of(a large amount of/large amounts of?) public resources. The resources would be more beneficial to the world if they could be spent in helping the sick children in the(去掉the?) Africa or otherwise be used for addressing the problems of the environment pollution and unemployment in America.
On the second hand, scandals may also distract us from substaintial problems which are related, they should not be exaggerated(这句话是不是有点问题，两个主语？). When a scandal is uncovered(exposured?更好，曝光) to the public, people do not focus on genesis of the scandal, but they pay more attention to the scandal itself. Thus, this can not solve the real problem. What's more, many people's work will be disrupted or even delayed by the scandal. In such a way, the scandal does not help us, but has detrimental effect to us. In the end, we will spend a lot of resources to reveal(in revealing?) scandals, sometimes it need more resources than the scandal's bad influence to the society. So we have to think about the significance deeply before we decide to reveal it, after all, changing the improper system behind the scandal is more significative to us.
To sum up, without scandals, we sometimes do not know that we still have problems which need to solve(need to be solved?). But superfluous attention to scandals would be detrimental, because solving the problems behind the scandal is more important than the scandal itself. We have our own work to do which should not be disrupted by scandals. Thus, a balance between them is  very crucial .

第一次用 出现这样的问题。崩溃！！！

PursueDreamUID: 2426799

I agree with the speaker's assertion that scandals can be useful in many areas. After all, they focus our attention on problems which are usually neglected by us. However, scandals always take some troubles to us, which sometimes are not a good thing.

On the one hand, I concede that the speaker has realized the good influence of scandals, which disclose the covered  squalidity and help us to pay attention to some unknown problems. We all know the Nixon's Watergate Affair which is a well-known political scandal. Without scandals, the public could not realize anything to the political problems.  Another example is the scandal of football corruption in china, which is called "Black Whistle". Now people pay much attention to it. In the economic realm, a good example is the Anron scandal which was(is) unimaginable to all of us. Thus, the problems of financial system in the world are well considered by the public. It is extraordinary usual that a scandal relates with waste of large amount of(a large amount of/large amounts of?) public resources. The resources would be more beneficial to the world if they could be spent in helping the sick children in the(去掉the?) Africa or otherwise be used for addressing the problems of the environment pollution and unemployment in America.

On the second hand, scandals may also distract us from substaintial problems which are related, they should not be exaggerated(这句话是不是有点问题，两个主语？). When a scandal is uncovered(exposured?曝光) to the public, people do not focus on genesis of the scandal, but they pay more attention to the scandal itself. Thus, this can not solve the real problem. What's more, many people's work will be disrupted or even delayed by the scandal. In such a way, the scandal does not help us, but has detrimental effect to us. In the end, we will spend a lot of resources to reveal(in revealing?) scandals, sometimes it need more resources than the scandal's bad influence to the society. So we have to think about the significance deeply before we decide to reveal it, after all, changing the improper system behind the scandal is more significative to us.

To sum up, without scandals, we sometimes do not know that we still have problems which need to solve(need to be solved?). But superfluous attention to scandals would be detrimental, because solving the problems behind the scandal is more important than the scandal itself. We have our own work to do which should not be disrupted by scandals. Thus, a balance between them is  very crucial .