BaXia小组第7次作业-michelle

michelle1021UID: 195011

Issue154:
Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
提纲：
赞成：
1，        父母才是拥有最终法律权利去决定哪些教育最适合自己的孩子
2，        在教育中，毕竟不是专业的教育人士最重视这些孩子，而是他们自己的父母
3，        communities的参与能更好的教导学生
反对：
1，        有些父母并不把孩子的教育放到重要的位置
2，        父母有时并不能够很好的了解孩子最适合哪种教育，这有可能造成不良后果
3，        太多人参与这个过程可能会使正常的教育被扰乱

The speaker asserts that both parents and communities must be involved in the local school and it is unwise to leave education solely to a group of professional educators. I strongly agree with the speaker, for parents are important factor in the process of students' education. However, when except for major decisions such as choice of school, a child's education is best left to professional educators.

The threshold reason why I agree with the speaker is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions on what educational choices are best suited for the child. Parents should have the right to know what happened to their children instead leaving them alone without care, and they also play a crucial part in the growth of their children and making important decisions about what kind of schools the children should go to or what kind of things kids really like surely should be included. After all, it is people like them who have the blood bond with their children and who can truly know the unique needs of a child-including what educational choices are best suited for them.

Another reason for my support to the speaker's claim is that parents are more motivated-by pride and ego-than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receiving the best possible education. It is a general known concept that parents are those people who care their children best except some rare situations, thus, I think no professional educators will spend as much as time as the children's own parents on one of the most important developmental processed in children's whole life. Therefore, it is an unsuspicious choice to let parents to participate in education.

Even assuming that with the communities' participation, local schools will do better in instructing the children, especially in the respect of moral instruction. If local schools can win the support of the communities, then the financial condition will be greatly enhanced and children will get a feeling that there are more people showing concern to them, so surely enough, they will try harder with their school works. Aside from these merits, receiving moral instruction will be a better way to equip children before they totally enter to the society, if so, our society is also the one which receive additional profits.

Nonetheless, I disagree with the speaker's claim for several reasons. In a perfect world, parents would always make their children's education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact, many parents do not. And also parents are not necessarily best equipped to know that is best for their children, they may not give their children a chance to speak out their real opinions and this is sometimes a detrimental to their development. In an addition, too many parties become involved in making decision about day-to-day instruction, the school education would be interfered and intervened.

In sum, with all that positive results which have been proved, parents and communities should be involved in the local schools. However, this activity may concurrently happen with series of bad effects that will constitute the best obstacle in the development of children. Hence, people and the whole nation should take great care about children's education, which is somewhat the country's future.

freud5027UID: 2165870

The speaker asserts that both parents and communities must be involved in the local school and it is unwise to leave education solely to a group of professional educators. I strongly agree with the speaker, for parents are important factor in the process of students' education. However, when except for major decisions such as choice of school, a child's education is best left to professional educators.

The threshold reason why I agree with the speaker is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions on what educational choices are best suited for the child. Parents should have the right to know what happened to their children instead leaving them alone without care, and they also play a crucial part in the growth of their children and making important decisions about what kind of schools the children should go to or what kind of things kids really like surely should be included. After all, it is people like them who have the blood bond with their children and who can truly know the unique needs of a child-including what educational choices are best suited for them.<这句的主谓宾我没搞清楚。。。>

Another reason for my support to the speaker's claim is that parents are more motivated-by pride and ego-than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receiving the best possible education. It is a general known concept that parents are those people who care their children best except some rare situations, thus, I think no professional educators will spend as much as time as the children's own parents on one of the most important developmental processed in children's whole life. Therefore, it is an unsuspicious choice to let parents to participate in education.

Even assuming that with the communities' participation, local schools will do better in instructing the children, especially in the respect of moral instruction. If local schools can win the support of the communities, then the financial condition will be greatly enhanced and children will get a feeling that there are more people showing concern to them, so surely enough, they will try harder with their school works. <这个，为学校提供资金赞助而因此使得学生更努力学习，怎么感觉好像穷人为了报恩拼命读书；一般用钱来改善教学环境，提高教学质量比较实际吧>Aside from these merits, receiving moral instruction will be a better way to equip children before they totally enter to the society, if so, our society is also the one which receive additional profits.

Nonetheless, I disagree with the speaker's claim for several reasons. In a perfect world, parents would always make their children's education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact, many parents do not. And also parents are not necessarily best equipped to know that is best for their children, they may not give their children a chance to speak out their real opinions and this is sometimes a detrimental to their development. In an addition, too many parties become involved in making decision about day-to-day instruction, the school education would be interfered and intervened.<要不把这句再写详细点，要么就再列举写理由，就这么一句，结束地有点匆忙>

In sum, with all that positive results which have been proved, parents and communities should be involved in the local schools. However, this activity may concurrently happen with series of bad effects that will constitute the best obstacle in the development of children. Hence, people and the whole nation should take great care about children's education, which is somewhat the country's future.


总体上是按照北美的思路来的，尽管前后结构稍微有点差别（要是我说错了，别打我）；
怎么说呢，可能范文各方面想法都比较成熟，但我觉得还是应该有自己的思路比较好。。。
（像我写之前，一般都不敢看，怕一看就被导过去了）

michelle1021UID: 195011

好，下次我一定不看

Anny.Y.WangUID: 2178596

The speaker asserts that both parents and communities must be involved in the local school and it is unwise to leave education solely to a group of professional educators. I strongly agree with the speaker, for parents are important factor in the process of students' education. However, when except for major decisions such as choice of school, a child's education is best left to professional educators.

The threshold reason why I agree with the speaker is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions on what educational choices are best suited for the child. Parents should have the right to know what happened to their children instead leaving them alone without care, and they also play a crucial part in the growth of their children and making important decisions about what kind of schools the children should go to or what kind of things kids really like surely 这个单词我觉得可以不要should be included. After all, it is people like them who have the blood bond with their children and who can truly know the unique needs of a child-including what educational choices are best suited for them.

Another reason for my support to the speaker's claim is that parents are more motivated-by pride and ego-than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receiving the best possible education. It is a general known concept that parents are those people who care their children best except some rare situations, thus, I think no professional educators will spend as much as删除 time as the children's own parents on one of the most important developmental processed in children's whole life. Therefore, it is an unsuspicious choice to let parents to participate in education.

Even assuming that with the communities' participation, local schools will do better in instructing the children, especially in the respect of moral instruction. If local schools can win the support of the communities, then the financial condition will be greatly enhanced and children will get a feeling that there are more people showing concern to them, so surely enough, they will try harder with their school works. Aside from these merits, receiving moral instruction will be a better way to equip children before they totally enter to the society, if so, our society is also the one which receive additional profits.

Nonetheless, I disagree with the speaker's claim for several reasons. In a perfect world, parents would always make their children's education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact, many parents do not. And also parents are not necessarily best equipped to know that is best for their children, they may not give their children a chance to speak out their real opinions and this is sometimes a detrimental to their development. In an addition, too many parties become involved in making decision about day-to-day instruction, the school education would be interfered and intervened.

In sum, with all that positive results which have been proved, parents and communities should be involved in the local schools. However, this activity may concurrently happen with series of bad effects that will constitute the best obstacle in the development of children. Hence, people and the whole nation should take great care about children's education, which is somewhat the country's future.

行文流利，总体来说还不错。就是frued说的，所有的题目要有自己的观点， 这样才会充实。
北美范围的好多思路，跟我们很不相符合，很难把握它的意思。

[ 本帖最后由 Anny.Y.Wang 于 2006-2-12 21:12 编辑 ]