ISSUE180【CLIMATE小组】第2次作业

didinjUID: 2144641

AS MORAL BEHAVIOR CANNOT BE LEGISLATED, LAWS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM ARE INEFFECTIVE IN SOLVING SOCIETY’S PROBLEM. I AGREE WITH THIS ASSERTION WHEN IT RELATES TO CONSTRATION ON CERTAIN PERSONAL FREEDOMS. HOWEVER, IT MUST BE LEGISLATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS WHEN IT COMES TO THE CONDUCT OF BUSSINESS.

MORAL LAWS THAT ARE INTENDED TO IMPOSE GOOD BEHAVIOR UPON OUR OWN CHOICE DO NOT WORK. PEOPLE ALWAYS EASY TO FIND EXCUSES TO CIRCUMVENT SUCH LAWS. FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN THEY MET AN OLD MAN ON THE BUS,PEOPLE MAY STILL SIT THERE, HAVING NOT INTEND TO STAND UP. THEY PROBABLY THOUGHT THEY WERE TIRED FOR WORKING A WHOLE DAY AND NOW IT WAS TIME TO RELAX.

EVEN THE ARGUMENT THAT LAWS THAT LEGISLATE MORALITY HAVE BENEFITS FOR SOCIETY GREATLY OUTWEIGH ANY IMPINGMENT ON PERSON FREEDOMS THEY MAY CAUSE. FOR INSTANCE, THOSE WHO DEFEND THE CRIMAINLIZATION OF TOBACCO USE A VARIETY OF HARMS THAT RESULT FROM WILDSPREAD. ADDICTION. HOWEVER, THESE DEFENDERS OVERLOOK THE FACT THAT OUTLAWING ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCES DOES NOT PREVERNT, OR EVEN DETER, PEOPLE FROM OBTAINING AND USING THEM. IT ONLY COMPLES USERS.

HOWEVER, UNLIKE PERSONAL BEHAVIORS, THE BEHAVIOR OF BUSINESSES CAN AND MUST BE CONTROLLED THROUGH LEGISLATION. BUSINESS MAN TEND TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THEIROWN FINANIAL INTEREST NOT ON BEHALF OF THE WHOLE SOCIETY. AND WHEN EXCESSIVEBUSSINESS PROFITS ACCRUE AT THE EXPENSE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, BUSSINESS HAS BEHAVED IMMORALLY. EXAMPLES OF LARGE-SCALE IMMORAL BEHAVIOR ON THE PART OF BUSSINESS ABOUND. FOR EXAMPLE, COAL MINE OWNERS, FAR FROM CARING ABOUT THE SAFETY AND WORKING CONDITIONS, HAS JUST WANNA BOOST PRODUCTIVITY AND CUT COSTS. DESPIRTE THE FALLING NUMBER OF WORKING MINERS, THE NUMBER OF FATALITIES CONTINUTES AT AN ALARMING RATE. IN SHORT, ONLY GOVERNMENT HOLDS THE REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT POWER TO IMPOSE THE STANDARDS NEEDED TO ENSURE MORAL BUSINESS BEHAVIOR.

THUS, WHETHER THE BEHAVIOR AT ISSUE INVOLVES PERSONAL FREEDOM, OR PUBLIC DUTY, A DISTINCTIONN MUST BE MADE.LEGISLATING PERSONAL MORAL BEHAVIOR IS NEITHER PRACTICABLE NOR PROPER IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY. ON THE OTHER HAND, LEGISLATING BUSINESS MORALITY IS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.




第一次写，还望大家多多指教啊。谢谢

LeonS.KennedyUID: 194492

AS MORAL BEHAVIOR CANNOT BE LEGISLATED, LAWS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM ARE INEFFECTIVE IN SOLVING SOCIETY’S PROBLEM. I AGREE WITH THIS ASSERTION WHEN IT RELATES TO CONSTRATION ON CERTAIN PERSONAL FREEDOMS. HOWEVER, IT MUST BE LEGISLATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS WHEN IT COMES TO THE CONDUCT OF BUSSINESS.

MORAL LAWS THAT ARE INTENDED TO IMPOSE GOOD BEHAVIOR UPON OUR OWN CHOICE DO NOT WORK. PEOPLE ALWAYS EASY TO FIND EXCUSES TO CIRCUMVENT SUCH LAWS. FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN THEY MET AN OLD MAN ON THE BUS,PEOPLE MAY STILL SIT THERE, HAVING NOT INTEND TO STAND UP. THEY PROBABLY THOUGHT THEY WERE TIRED FOR WORKING A WHOLE DAY AND NOW IT WAS TIME TO RELAX.

EVEN THE ARGUMENT THAT LAWS THAT LEGISLATE MORALITY HAVE BENEFITS FOR SOCIETY GREATLY OUTWEIGH ANY IMPINGMENT ON PERSON FREEDOMS THEY MAY CAUSE. FOR INSTANCE, THOSE WHO DEFEND THE CRIMAINLIZATION OF TOBACCO USE A VARIETY OF HARMS THAT RESULT FROM WILDSPREAD. ADDICTION. HOWEVER, THESE DEFENDERS OVERLOOK THE FACT THAT OUTLAWING ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCES DOES NOT PREVERNT, OR EVEN DETER, PEOPLE FROM OBTAINING AND USING THEM. IT ONLY COMPLES USERS.

HOWEVER, UNLIKE PERSONAL BEHAVIORS, THE BEHAVIOR OF BUSINESSES CAN AND MUST BE CONTROLLED THROUGH LEGISLATION. BUSINESS MAN TEND TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THEIROWN FINANIAL INTEREST NOT ON BEHALF OF THE WHOLE SOCIETY. AND WHEN EXCESSIVEBUSSINESS PROFITS ACCRUE AT THE EXPENSE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, BUSSINESS HAS BEHAVED IMMORALLY. EXAMPLES OF LARGE-SCALE IMMORAL BEHAVIOR ON THE PART OF BUSSINESS ABOUND. FOR EXAMPLE, COAL MINE OWNERS, FAR FROM CARING ABOUT THE SAFETY AND WORKING CONDITIONS, HAS JUST WANNA BOOST PRODUCTIVITY AND CUT COSTS. DESPIRTE THE FALLING NUMBER OF WORKING MINERS, THE NUMBER OF FATALITIES CONTINUTES AT AN ALARMING RATE. IN SHORT, ONLY GOVERNMENT HOLDS THE REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT POWER TO IMPOSE THE STANDARDS NEEDED TO ENSURE MORAL BUSINESS BEHAVIOR.

THUS, WHETHER THE BEHAVIOR AT ISSUE INVOLVES PERSONAL FREEDOM, OR PUBLIC DUTY, A DISTINCTIONN MUST BE MADE.LEGISLATING PERSONAL MORAL BEHAVIOR IS NEITHER PRACTICABLE NOR PROPER IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY. ON THE OTHER HAND, LEGISLATING BUSINESS MORALITY IS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.

强夫UID: 2156262

AS MORAL BEHAVIOR CANNOT BE LEGISLATED, LAWS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM ARE INEFFECTIVE IN SOLVING SOCIETY’S PROBLEM. I AGREE WITH THIS ASSERTION WHEN IT RELATES TO CONSTRATION ON CERTAIN PERSONAL FREEDOMS. HOWEVER, IT MUST BE LEGISLATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS WHEN IT COMES TO THE CONDUCT OF BUSSINESS.

MORAL LAWS THAT ARE INTENDED TO IMPOSE GOOD BEHAVIOR UPON OUR OWN CHOICE DO NOT WORK. PEOPLE ALWAYS EASY TO FIND EXCUSES TO CIRCUMVENT SUCH LAWS. FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN THEY MET AN OLD MAN ON THE BUS,PEOPLE MAY STILL SIT THERE, HAVING NOT INTEND TO STAND UP. THEY PROBABLY THOUGHT THEY WERE TIRED FOR WORKING A WHOLE DAY AND NOW IT WAS TIME TO RELAX.

EVEN THE ARGUMENT THAT LAWS THAT LEGISLATE MORALITY HAVE BENEFITS FOR SOCIETY GREATLY OUTWEIGH ANY IMPINGMENT ON PERSON FREEDOMS THEY MAY CAUSE. FOR INSTANCE, THOSE WHO DEFEND THE CRIMAINLIZATION OF TOBACCO USE A VARIETY OF HARMS THAT RESULT FROM WILDSPREAD. ADDICTION. HOWEVER, THESE DEFENDERS OVERLOOK THE FACT THAT OUTLAWING ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCES DOES NOT PREVERNT, OR EVEN DETER, PEOPLE FROM OBTAINING AND USING THEM. IT ONLY COMPLES USERS.

HOWEVER, UNLIKE PERSONAL BEHAVIORS, THE BEHAVIOR OF BUSINESSES CAN AND MUST BE CONTROLLED THROUGH LEGISLATION. BUSINESS MAN TEND TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THEIROWN FINANIAL INTEREST NOT ON BEHALF OF THE WHOLE SOCIETY. AND WHEN EXCESSIVEBUSSINESS PROFITS ACCRUE AT THE EXPENSE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, BUSSINESS HAS BEHAVED IMMORALLY. EXAMPLES OF LARGE-SCALE IMMORAL BEHAVIOR ON THE PART OF BUSSINESS ABOUND. FOR EXAMPLE, COAL MINE OWNERS, FAR FROM CARING ABOUT THE SAFETY AND WORKING CONDITIONS, HAS JUST WANNA BOOST PRODUCTIVITY AND CUT COSTS. DESPIRTE THE FALLING NUMBER OF WORKING MINERS, THE NUMBER OF FATALITIES CONTINUTES AT AN ALARMING RATE. IN SHORT, ONLY GOVERNMENT HOLDS THE REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT POWER TO IMPOSE THE STANDARDS NEEDED TO ENSURE MORAL BUSINESS BEHAVIOR.

THUS, WHETHER THE BEHAVIOR AT ISSUE INVOLVES PERSONAL FREEDOM, OR PUBLIC DUTY, A DISTINCTIONN MUST BE MADE.LEGISLATING PERSONAL MORAL BEHAVIOR IS NEITHER PRACTICABLE NOR PROPER IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY. ON THE OTHER HAND, LEGISLATING BUSINESS MORALITY IS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.

大写看起来比较吃力。你应该是一半一半立场分领域讨论了，但是我认为你在阐述道德立法和个人行为关系上不够深入，如果挖掘点道德与人的行为上的冲突更好（比如政治家与诚实），我个人认为这样的内容会丰满一些。你前面一半说的很简单。。。

强夫UID: 2156262

记得回拍啊