- 最后登录
- 2017-6-12
- 在线时间
- 329 小时
- 寄托币
- 2755
- 声望
- 16
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-21
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 10
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1651
- UID
- 2110458
 
- 声望
- 16
- 寄托币
- 2755
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-21
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 10
|
issue87 "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
我自己觉得词汇很是问题,用的词汇都好象是cet-4里面写作文用的低级词汇,很多高级词汇只是认识没有把握拼写.再就是分析问题的深度不够,有点肤浅? 另外最重要的逻辑也不知道到底有没有问题.
麻烦斑竹看一下,最好能大概给个分数.
position:在多数情况下新手更有可能取得重要的突破
1.承认在少数领域专家更容易有新发现
2.专家的经验在很多情况下对新发现是无益的
3.新手的创新精神更能有新突破
In the era of rapid information and technological changes, more and more beginners have been making significant discoveries. Are the beginners more likely to make advancements than the experts in any field of inquiry? I agree insofar as in certain fields, experts have more experience as well as knowledge with which to lend some credence for discovering new things. However, in my view, in most fields the beginners have more chances to make important discoveries.
Admittedly, the experts seem to make progress easily in some fields, in which more emphasis is placed on experience. These fields, such as mathematics, are most reliant on basic knowledge. Experts in these fields usually have comprehended the "core" knowledge of the subject and have adroitly used the knowledge many times, during which useful experience has been accumulated. For example, in the field of mathematics, most of the winners of the Noble Prize are experts who have studied mathematics for many years and it is rare to see beginners make great advancements in such a field. However, there are not so many fields in which experience can determine the result of research.
Instead, the experience which experts hold is not beneficial in most fields of inquiry. Experts usually tend to depend on their prior experience too much which thwarts them from making significant discoveries. Since their spirits and minds are restricted by their experience, they might do everything by the same means just because they succeeded by those means before. Unfortunately, nowadays society needs more people who are able to make progress not just keep conservative. The discovery of the correlation between baby diapers and beer will be a telling illustration. It was noticed by an employee working in a supermarket in Britain for only a short time, that a myriad of customers liked to buy beer and baby diapers, which were not arrayed on the same shelves, on the same shopping trip. He gave the advice to the manager that arraying beer and diapers on the same shelves may increase the sale of both items. The manager thought the advice was absurd but he decided to have a try. As a result, the sale on beer and diapers enjoyed a boom as expected. Undoubtedly, this discovery could not be made by “experience”.
With the rapid advancement in technology and science, it is more likely for those who tend to innovate to make significant discoveries. The beginners are informed with the most recent information which allows them to solve problems with new perspectives. For instance, many of the most notable figures in the field of computer engineering are young people who are not the so-called experts, and as we know, the widely used Linux system was designed by a boy in high school, which have been used widely. The thing in common is the innovative spirits.
In the final analysis, I concede that experts in some fields have contributed to our society with their experience. However, we should not overlook the fact that the beginners who have innovative spirits are more likely than the experts to make significant discoveries in most fields of inquiry.
[ 本帖最后由 xwjeff 于 2006-7-20 22:31 编辑 ] |
|