TOEFL2009 上半年Dark_Tournament写作小组网兜妮妮第十四次作业

网兜妮妮UID: 2612538

My little sister like watching TV very much, as a 12-year-old little girl, she spends as much as 4 hours sitting before the television. My mom just said “turn off the TV and read some books”, but my sister argued that watching TV is also a way to learn. Of course, TV can tell us some kind of knowledge, but I stand on my mother's side and hold the opinion that we can absorb more through books instead of watching TV. I got some convincing reasons to support my view.
Firstly, without the picture of TV, one can use his or her imaginations to understand the context, which is helpful in building a complete thinking method, as well as developing creativity. There is no denying that TV is more attractive than books because of the colorful pictures. But it is not a good thing to our learning. Every receiver has an individual set of purposes and explanations, to understand the author or to understand the thought, but television gives everyone a stable image of each question,which is a great limit to imagination. Take <Harry Potter>as an example, every reader have a particular picture of Harry and the magic school, but when the story goes to film, there is only one Harry and one magic school in the screen. No room for imagination.So, with the increasing time spends on watching TV, a child will loose the ability to think a question independently and loose creativity as well.
On the other hand, the process of learning is a kind of action to search new things to enlarge our horizon. It is a positive action. But what TV gives us is not well selected and is hardly suit for everyone. It has a stable timetable to show programs and as an ordinary individual, one can not change the program to what he or she wants. The only thing is to receive. For example, you just need something about law, but the law program is on weekend, you can not get it now. And in most time, even though the TV program satisfies what you want in knowledge, it is less related recourses show in TV for further learning. So TV always served as entertainment, not the effective way to learn,
Judging from the evidence offered, obviously we can draw the conclusion that books can provide us more versus television; books not only give you room for independent thinking, but also easy to check and provide more. So, I strongly disagree with the statement that we can learn more from watching TV than reading books.

恩恩的囡囡UID: 2542371

1# 网兜妮妮


My little sister likes watching TV very much, （用句号 ）as a 12-year-old little girl, she spends as much as 4 hours a  day sitting before the television. My mom just said “ (T)turn off the TV and read some books”, but my sister argued that watching TV is also a way to learn. Of course, TV can tell us some kind of knowledge, but I stand on my mother's side and hold the opinion that we can absorb more through reading books instead of watching TV. I got some convincing reasons to support my view.


Firstly, without the pictures of TV, one can use his or her imaginations to understand the context, which is helpful in building a complete thinking method, as well as developing creativity. There is no denying that TV is more attractive than books because of the colorful pictures. But it is not a good thing to our learning. Every receiver has an individual set of purposes and explanations, to understand the author or to understand the thought, but television gives everyone a stable image of each question,which is a great limit to the imagination. Take <Harry Potter>(英文里面没有书名号的，把书名倾斜就可以了)as an example, every reader have a particular picture of Harry and the magic school, but when the story goes to film, there is only one Harry and one magic school in the screen. No room for imagination.So, with the increasing time spends(ed) on watching TV, a child will loose(lose) the ability to think a question independently and loose creativity as well.8


On the other hand, the process of learning is a kind of action to search new things to enlarge our horizon. It is a positive action. But what TV gives us is not well selected and is hardly suit for everyone. It has a stable timetable to show programs and as an ordinary individual, one can not change the program to what he or she wants. The only thing is to receive. For example, you just need something about law, but the law program is on weekend, you can not get it now. And in most time, even though the TV program satisfies what you want in knowledge(这里satisfy有点问题), it is less related recourses show in TV for further learning（这个有点难以理解）. So TV always served as entertainment, not the effective way to learn,

Judging from the evidence offered, obviously we can draw the conclusion that books can provide us more versus television; books not only give you room for independent thinking, but also easy to check and provide more（前后结构不统一）. So, I strongly disagree with the statement that we can learn more from watching TV than reading books.

总的我觉得论点不错，就是中式英语比较多