寄托天下
查看: 1449|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[经验感悟] economist阅读写作分析--g20--3.28--艾尘草 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
18
寄托币
909
注册时间
2009-1-16
精华
0
帖子
11

GRE梦想之帆

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-3-28 23:00:50 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 艾尘草 于 2009-3-28 23:02 编辑

The G20 summit


London calling


Mar 26th 2009
From The Economist print edition


Trade is collapsing and protectionism is on the rise. Time for the G20 to get going



THE first task for the leaders of the Group of 20, who will meet in London on April 2nd, will be to do no harm. Don’t fall out over whether Germany and China are spending enough public money to get the world economy going. (祈使句,增强了句子多样性,也引发了读者的兴趣)Let’s not have a row over how to run the IMF
(International Monetary Fund 国际货币基金组织). And spare us a tirade
(激烈演说) against “market fundamentalism”. (第一段的文章就波澜起伏,一唱三叹)


The second task is to do something useful. Ideally, the G20 would boost government spending, partly by giving the IMF more money. And it would take five minutes to shunt(转移方向) the re-regulation of finance into groups that can deliberate now and act later, when there is more time and less ire: the last thing to fear from Wall Street today is irrational exuberance.长句子,积累到本子上了


It is the third task that is being neglected. Publicly, the G20’s leaders would be shocked, shocked (这个地方的断句)if anyone were to turn against open markets. Even so, trade is collapsing and an insidious protectionism is on the rise (see article). As the storm rages, the London summit looks like offering nothing but pieties. The trading system needs more than that.


Do as I say, not as I do


On March 23rd the World Trade Organisation (WTO) predicted that global trade will plunge by 9% this year—the steepest drop since the second world war.(经济现状) Japan’s exports in February were half what they had been a year earlier; yet its imports had fallen so much that the country still recorded a surplus.


This collapse is partly due to globalisation. The days are gone when something was made in one country and exported.(调整句型) Products now contain parts from all over the world. Trade statistics look at value, not value-added, so they include a lot of double counting as parts move across borders and back. When the economy shrinks, trade will shrink faster.


But that is not the full story. The World Bank says that, since the G20 leaders last met in November in Washington, DC, 17 of their countries have restricted trade. Some have raised tariffs, as Russia did on second-hand cars and India did on steel. Citing safety(引论新用法)banned imports of Irish pork and Italian brandy. Across the world, there has been a surge in actions against “dumping”—the sale of exports, supposedly at a loss, in order to undermine the competition.(看到这句有点火,压制住,水饺咋了~~为哈子还要背压制。。) Governments everywhere are favouring locally made goods.(总结型语句)


Some take comfort from the world’s interdependency. Producers in Brazil rejected protection, because Brazilian tariffs would have raised their own prices. Neither of France’s carmakers wanted to have to guarantee jobs at home as a condition for state aid, as President Nicolas Sarkozy had stipulated.(迷茫
这个是句子吗?)


But interdependency is a slender reed
. (比喻句)Plenty of people argued against the Smoot-Hawley bill, which raised tariffs at the onset of the Depression. One danger today is that, under WTO rules, some countries have scope to put tariffs up without breaching their legal limits. Countries can indeed justify protection using safety or dumping, even if that breaks the spirit of open markets; and when protection reaches some (unknown) level, global supply chains will break down.长句子 If that happens, they will not be rebuilt for many years.


After they met in Washington last November, G20 leaders said that they had united to support open markets. But promises alone will no longer do. In London they need to limit the scope for tariff increases—ideally by finishing the Doha round of trade talks; they should agree to put aside anti-dumping actions(指代) and the rest of the apparatus of legal trade protection; and should ensure that subsidies do not discriminate against foreign firms. )(句子好完美)(指出不应当有的行为)Leaders were counting on trade to be the straightforward part of the summit, but if they think fighting protectionism is easy work, then they aren’t doing enough.(最后总结)



这文章太好了,有冲动把它背下来
推荐强烈推荐。。。
先潦草的评论一下,每个句子都很经典,等背过深入了重新修改~
已有 1 人评分寄托币 收起 理由
zhtwd + 20 赞~现在加分给你~

总评分: 寄托币 + 20   查看全部投币

0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
18
寄托币
909
注册时间
2009-1-16
精华
0
帖子
11

GRE梦想之帆

沙发
发表于 2009-3-28 23:01:44 |只看该作者
深绿:好句子
浅绿:长句 不明白的句子
红色:好的用法
黄色:不会的单词

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
30
寄托币
862
注册时间
2009-2-7
精华
0
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2009-3-28 23:54:03 |只看该作者
做的好认真,赞一个···
问两句话:The days are gone when something was made in one country and exported.        the days are gone是什么意思??Trade statistics look at value, not value-added, so they include a lot of double counting as parts move across borders and back.还有这句后半句as parts move across borders and back怎么理解??

关于那个dumping,我也很无语,能用他们的成本方法计算么,很无耻啊···

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
18
寄托币
909
注册时间
2009-1-16
精华
0
帖子
11

GRE梦想之帆

地板
发表于 2009-3-29 14:28:48 |只看该作者
3# joyceww88
the days are gone
我认为这个gone 不能当做go的过去分词,此处应该是形容词形式~gone的形容词有,过去的遗失的的含义,这里的遗失是说这钟日子已经一去不复返了,但是我也不是很清楚这里为什么没有使用过去完成形式。
第二句话要放到文章里面去看
首先这段说的是为哈子When the economy shrinks, trade will shrink faster
文章归咎的原因是globalisation所以这里的意思应该是在许多商品的不同构件是在不同的国家进行的,可能原料在中国出产,而产品在日本生产,之后商品再买回给中国的时候可能造成所谓的“来来回回”即as parts move across borders and back,最终造成的就是经济的下滑~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
30
寄托币
862
注册时间
2009-2-7
精华
0
帖子
2
5
发表于 2009-3-29 15:03:06 |只看该作者
听起来很有道理啊,这么说就大概明白这俩句子的意思了,谢谢呵呵

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
26
寄托币
372
注册时间
2006-4-18
精华
0
帖子
2
6
发表于 2009-6-25 17:21:19 |只看该作者
哈哈,楼主分析很好,只是貌似有个很好玩的错误,

anti-dumping actions   是反倾销措施, 不是反 饺子的。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
424
寄托币
8884
注册时间
2007-3-26
精华
0
帖子
32

荣誉版主 GRE守护之星 备考先锋 AW活动特殊奖

7
发表于 2009-6-25 21:32:54 |只看该作者
这个要赞一下^^
纵浪大化中,不喜亦不惧。应尽便须尽,无复独多虑。

【文以载道】难句复习小组大贴

★☆★Economist系列精读★☆★

使用道具 举报

RE: economist阅读写作分析--g20--3.28--艾尘草 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
economist阅读写作分析--g20--3.28--艾尘草
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-935251-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部