31

枫枫枫UID: 2744171

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People are never satisfied with what they have; they always want something more or something different. Use specific reasons to support your answer.

Although some, holding this belief that
people are never content with what they have and they always pursue something more or something different, maintain that infinite demands and desires consist part of human nature,
I disagree with the speaker since most ordinary people in the world are not the same as what the speaker lists.

Admittedly, those insatiable/avaricious people have some problematic psychological deficienciesy such as lacking the ability to struggle for a balance between what they already have and what they can never get. For instance, there is a kind of person that theirwhose primary purpose of life is to earn a large amount of money and when they have made one million dollars, then they immediately set up next target as one billion, which extends beyond his/her ability. So their voracious appetite can never be satisfied for their inherent inconsistency.

Despite some people have mental troubles in being satisfied, most common people know how to dispose cope with the relationship between reality and desires. One example involves our common experience as humans that we wish to enjoy a film in the cinema, to travel around the world, or to get a bicycle as a birthday gift, and so forth, when we have a chance to do such things, obviously, we gain enormous satisfaction and happiness at this moment. Accordingly, these positive emotions stimulate us to require something more or something new consciously or subconsciously. As is often the case, however, fortunateness will not come in doouble. To balance our well-being when we cannot chalk up what we want, we often choose to
give upforego our redundant requirements.

Another group people of high level spiritual and intellectual standards appear grateful to anything they have, even misfortune or a catastrophe, from which we should learn
virtuous people.

Every person has his/her own comprehension about what they have and what they want, which associates with one's value system. And this understanding also have an influence on one's well-being and happiness. As an old saying goes:" You will never have what you like until you learn to like what you have", so the first thing before we have what we like is to like what we have.

mpromanusUID: 2565872

Although some, holding this belief that. B. \) P  @5 r3 J# d& L9 B: n1 C people are never content with what they have and they always pursue something more or something different, maintain that infinite demands and desires consist are part of human nature (You can either use '..demands and desires partly consist IN human nature', or 'human nature consists OF demands and desires'. There's no expression such as 'consist part of'.), I disagree with the speaker (You're given a written statement so there's no 'speaker' involved here. The use of 'list' at the end of this sentence adds on to my suspicion that you are copying from an integrated writing template.) since most ordinary people in the world are not the same as what the speaker lists?.

Admittedly, those insatiable/avaricious (I see you are getting lazy in copy & pasting, and I don't like it. At least you could DECIDE on one word to use. Plus, simply wanting something doesn't necessarily mean avaricious, because this word means 'greedy especially in the desire to HOARD money'.) people have some problematic psychological deficienciesy (So you're saying greedy people all have phychological problems. That sounds almost downright discriminating.) such as lacking the ability to struggle (To be able to 'struggle' for anything is not an ability.) for a balance between what they already have and what they can never get (What they WANT might not be something they can never get. Do NOT change the definition of your question to suit your discussion without establishing this definition upfront. Otherwise, you're making an invalid claim because what you're discussion is not what the question is asking for.). For instance, there is a kind of person that their (I'm starting to wonder where all the colors in your essay came from.) whose primary purpose of life is to earn a large amount of money, and when they have made one million dollars, then they immediately set up nexttarget as one billion, which extends beyond his/her ability (Bill Gates is worth USD 50 billion, so I don't see WHY you think one billion would be 'beyond someone's ability' without any solid proof. Just HOW COULD YOU judge a person's ability to make money or decide the amount of money he/she'll make?). So their voracious appetite can never be satisfied for their inherent inconsistency (And pray tell WHAT inconsistency you're talking about?). (This whole paragraph is filled with absurd logic and sentences whose ideas don't connect to each other, yet fails to answer the question: WHY DO YOU DISAGREE with the question. You start with stating that insatiable people have psychological problems such as failure to 'balance between' possessions and wants, then goes on to say some people set their targets high while they can't really do it. How then are these supposed to relate to each other? Are you trying to say that 不能平衡已有的和想要的 is the same as 好高骛远? That would make me guess you don't even understand how your arguments should develop in Chinese. My point is that you'll never write a good essay by thinking about one sentence at a time, one after another. You have to think about how your sentences should explain one another, and how they should come together as a complete argument, and how this complete argument validates your opinion about the given topic.)

Despite the fact that? some people have mental troubles (Again, you're defining the problem as a 'mental' one without any valid proof.) in being satisfied, most common people know how to dispose cope with the relationship between reality and desires. One example involves our common experience as humans that we wish to enjoy a film in the cinema, to travel around the world, or to get a bicycle as a birthday gift, and so forth, when we have a chance to do such things, obviously, we gain enormous satisfaction and happiness at this moment. (The point in question is that people are not satisfied with what they HAVE. If you disagree with that, your point would be people are satisfied with what they HAVE. This is NOT about people being satisfied with getting what they wish.) Accordingly, these positive emotions stimulate us to require (This means you want something that is 'necessary', or something that you 'need',. It's basically the opposite of 'want' or 'desire'.) something more or something new consciously or subconsciously. As is often the case, however,fortuneateness will not come in doouble (I think you mean 'twice'.). To balance our well-being when we cannot chalk up what we want, we often choose to give upforego our redundant (This means something is 'uselessly repetitive'. If you use this word here, you mean that these 'requirements' that you 'forego' are the same as your old ones.) requirements. (You're again arguing with absurd logic. By acknowledging that getting things will 'stimulate' people to want more, you're saying that they do have the want in the first place! The desire is still there, it's just that they CHOOSE to not to satisfy it. The question is asking whether you agree that people ALWAYS want more/something different, and if you state that you disagree, you'd be arguing that people DON'T ALWAYS WANT more/something different. This means you should prove that the desire is not always there, but instead you say that yes, the emotion will be there. To simply speak, you're actually arguing for what you're disagreeing with.)

Another group of people of high level spiritual and intellectual standards appear grateful to anything they have, even in misfortune or a catastrophe, from whom we should learn virtuous people. (Examples? You can't just leave a sentence alone here like this.)

Every person has his/her own comprehension about what they have and what they want, which associates with one's value system. And this understanding also has an influence on one's well-being and happiness. As an old saying goes:" You will never have what you like until you learn to like what you have", so the first thing before we have what we like is to like what we have. (If you really need to repeat a saying, at least rephrase it. Plus, this paragraph is where you state your opinion clearly again. The question is not asking you about value systems or whether/how people should balance between haves and wants, but AGREE or DISAGREE. All your arguments and examples should ultimately bring you back here, or else you're wandering off the topic.)

总结：

我是不反对copy & paste啦不过可不可以至少不要有这么多明显的copy & paste的痕迹留在上面。。=.=

语法 - 没有问题。

词汇 - 你的用词有些很不精准，以后请看好词汇的细微之处再用。。

逻辑 - 只能说全篇不知所云了吧，感觉像是在google做任意关键字搜寻，只要是和题目沾点边的都挂上来然后能顺着往下写就往下写，写不下去就先挂上去再说。。完全没有点题，完全没有实在的例子。。问题问的是你同意不同意，不是在拥有物质方面人应该有怎样的道德观价值观，请注意不要看见一个道德价值相关的题目就开始往五讲四美和谐社会人类心灵普世价值上靠拢。。而且你的逻辑推演非常有问题，完全做不出有说服力的论证，第三段好不容易有了一个论证，问题是你同意不同意 人从来不满足于自己拥有的，总是会想要新的或者别的东西，你自己本来是反方，就说 人不总是想要更多东西 好了，结果你说 一般人得到自己想要的东西总是会很开心然后就会想要更多的东西 只是 他们会为了心灵平衡选择放弃 ，这不是变成给正方论证了么。。=.= 建议你先去看看辩论赛之类，看看逻辑是怎么推演和被挑刺的，明白要怎么让自己说的东西完整严谨地表达自己应该表达的观点，再来练议论文。。