【Big Fish】习作-2.26 Argument37-By Narashy

NarashyUID: 2602795

这篇写得字很少。。。。望很拍

In this argument, the author concludes that Palean baskets were not unique to Palea. To substantiate his/her conclusion, the author cites the fact that Palean baskets have also been found at Lithos and Paleans should not have go across the Brim River which seperate Lithos from Palean. Although it seems quite sound, the argument rests on a series of unsubstantiated assumptions which render the conclusion highly suspectable as it stands.

First of all, the author fails to provide enough information about the Brim River. When does it appears in history? Was is shallow or deep in that period? It is entirely possible that the Paleans could reach Lithos by swimming or even the river does not exist at all. Unless it can be shown that the river do seperate Palean from Lithos which is hard to go across, the conclusion is completely unconvincing.

Second, even if the assumption about the river holds, which is unwarranted, it does not necessarily follow that Palean's baskets can not arrive at Lithos. It appears reasonable that the baskets could come to Lithos by floating across the river. What's more, although lack large boats, it is still possible for Palean people to reach Lithos by canoe or other tools. However, from the argument, we can see no sign that would rule out these scearios. Further analysis and investigation should be conducted before the conclusion is obtained.

In addtion, the author commits the fallacy of hasty generalization. Although full of nuts, berries, Palean's people may still have good reasons to go to Lithos, such as the distinct plants, useful tools or even for fun. Without taking into account these alternatives, the conclusion is completely unwarranted.

To sum up, the author's seemingly sound conclusion is not well-supported. To convince me the argument, the author should provide the details about the geographical information at that time, especially about the Brim River. To better evaluate the conclusion, information about Palean's life is needed.

tc1220UID: 2585174

i'm sorry今天不行了，明天我来很拍。。。

tc1220UID: 2585174

In this argument, the author concludes that Palean baskets were not unique to Palea. To substantiate his/her conclusion, the author cites the fact that Palean baskets have also been found at Lithos and Paleans should not have go across the Brim River which seperate Lithos from Palean. Although it seems quite sound, the argument rests on a series of unsubstantiated assumptions which render the conclusion highly suspectable as it stands.

First of all, the author fails to provide enough information about the Brim River. When does it appears in history? Was is shallow or deep in that period? It is entirely possible that the Paleans could reach Lithos by swimming or even the river does not exist at all 就是crustal movement ~~~. Unless it can be shown that the river do seperate Palean from Lithos which is hard to go across, the conclusion is completely unconvincing.

Second, even if the assumption about the river holds, which is unwarranted, it does not necessarily follow that Palean's baskets can not arrive at Lithos. It appears reasonable that the baskets could come to Lithos by floating across the river.(OK 哦，floating) What's more, although lack large boats, it is still possible for Palean people to reach Lithos by canoe or other tools. However, from the argument, we can see no sign that would rule out these scearios. Further analysis and investigation should be conducted before the conclusion is obtained.

In addtion, the author commits the fallacy of hasty generalization. Although full of nuts, berries, Palean's people may still have good reasons to go to Lithos, such as the distinct plants, useful tools or even for fun. Without taking into account these alternatives, the conclusion is completely unwarranted. (这点也可以啊，但写的少了，展开的少了)

To sum up, the author's seemingly sound conclusion is not well-supported. To convince me the argument, the author should provide the details about the geographical information at that time, especially about the Brim River. To better evaluate the conclusion, information about Palean's life is needed.(最后来个SUGGESTIONS吧，author should provide enough evidence that the river was wide and long at that time and Paleans were impossible to swim across the river. He should also provide ........    With these information, he can make such a conclusion.)

个人的一点拙见，希望能对你有帮助～～～