“great与众不同”的写作楼，尽请大家指教！

great与众不同UID: 2558121

题目：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Younger school children(age five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math language, science and history.

Recently, people have been discussing that whether should a school require younger children to study art and music in addition to math, language, science and history. While some people claim that by this way, children could get much knowledge. I take the opposite that requiring young children study too much bring benefits to nobody.

The first reason why I hold this opinion is that studying too much is a big burden. For children, they may feel bored with studying. Because all children like playing, when studying occupied much time, they must be unhappy. For schools, it costs much money to let children study so many courses. Because the more  courses there are, the more teachers they need to employ. What's more, a school also need more classrooms. So it must be a big liability for school.

In addition, requiring young children study such curses is not beneficial for society. In the short term, the society have to put more finance on education, so there is less finance on other important parts, like medical insurance and advantage scientific research. In the long term, there couldn't be more talents working for the society. Because nobody can prove that learning such knowledge in children hood could help them after they growing up.

Admittedly, learning more knowledge could widen children's eyes, but it can't be useful in the future. Because people may forget what they learned in young time, easily. Otherwise, that knowledge may do nothing about their spheres.

In a word, asking young children studying too many course are unnecessary, not only couldn't it bring any benefits to neither children nor school, but also be harmful for the society. The benefits for children to study these courses are limited. So we can't safely conclude that people shouldn't require young children to study art and music in addition to math, language, science, or history.

xiongcan818UID: 2849571

OK 修改好，见附件

great与众不同UID: 2558121

2010-12-29
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Good looks and dresses are more important for success than good ideas.3 S

Good looks and good ideas, which is more important for success? It's a popular debate. While some people claim that good looks and dresses could give others a good impression, I take the opposite that good ideas are more important for success.

The first reason why I hold this opinion is that good ideas could react one's ability. For individuals, that to be success by using good ideas is a more realitive way. Because it's hard for them to change their appearance, but they can get good ideas from hard working and studying. for a company, it requires staffs' good ideas to ensure its success for a long period. Because good looks are not permanent, when staffs being aged, seldom of them are still beautiful. On the other hand, a staff within rich experience, which being got from a long working career, could come up with more good ideas.

Furthermore, demand of society also help creative people to get success. Because the society need good ideas to develop. In the short term, new inventions could make people's life become convenience. In the long term, science and technology could improved a lot. By the way, good ideas are not only help individuals to get success, but also play an role, which can't be take place, in social developing.

Admittedly, good looks could let person give others a deep impression, but only capable people could be popular among others in following days. Because they have varies method to help their friends, nobody would like to say "No" to a person helpful.

In a word, as good ideas contribute greatly to individual, companies, and the society in both long term and short term, otherwise, effects of good looks and dresses are limited, we can safely conclude that good ideas are more important for success.

xiongcan818UID: 2849571

OK,已回答问题 并 修改。见附件。

great与众不同UID: 2558121

2010-12-30
题目：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern society has become more complex, so it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.

Recently, people have been discussing that if it is important for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. While, some people claim that since more and more work opportunities appear in the society, young people could live easily. I take the opposite side that young people should be good at planing and organizing.

The first reason why I hold this opinion is that the ability of planing and organizing play a role in people's life. For young people, who have a great capability to plan and organize, could be put in an important position in company, because these ability is the basic element of leadership. The popular notion is that a leader have to make plans and organize members of the group.Thus, all the companies will value that ability. For young people's parents, they also be proud of their children who be good at planing and organizing, because parents hope their children to show promise, and to be a leader is the best way, they could be looked up.

Furthermore, a country need young people to have the capacity to plan and organize. In short term, young people's good ideas could contribute greatly to the country. Within excellent plans, a country could have extraordinary developments in economic, industry, and many other regions which are so capital to people's life. In the long term, as the accumulating of experience, people within ability to organize in young hood could be a good leader. For most counties, the leader is the president, and a wise president could change the destiny of a country.

Although there are more working opportunities for young people, they still need to improve the ability to plan, because at first, they have to determine what job they want to get. To get the favorite job, to make the dream come true, the only way to young people is to try their best to perfect themselves by practicing skills, including the ability to plan and organize.

I a word, as the ability to plane and organize takes a considerable part in the society, the new force , young people should aware the importance of that ability.

xiongcan818UID: 2849571

12.30独立已完成修改

great与众不同UID: 2558121

2010-12-31
题目：Do you agree with the following statement? Should people be allowed to use mobile phone in public transportations(bus, plane, trains, etc. )

A popular notion is that passengers should not make a call in flying plane. While some people claim that mobile phone should be forbidden in all public transportation. But I take the opposite side that a mobile phone is necessary to a passenger in a trip.

The first reason why I hold this opinion is that a passenger need to use a mobile phone in public transportation, such as bus and trains. For a passenger self, a mobile phone could make the trip more interesting. Because a long trip is boring, one may want to chatting with others. Within a mobile phone, the passenger could call friends and talk to them. Otherwise, passenger also could play electric games by a mobile phone. For a passenger's friends and relatives, they also demand the passenger taking a mobile phone on trip. Because they care about the passenger deeply, and want to ensure the passenger travel safely. By the passenger's mobile phone, they could know his or her situation at any time.

Furthermore, most kinds of public transportation should allow passengers using mobile phone on the trip. Because a mobile phone do nothing with most public transportation, such as bus and trains, they won't care about that. What's more, thanks to the mobile phone, passengers may complained less about the crowded traffic during a happy talk with friends or a exciting game. For that reason, a bus even should encourage passengers to use a mobile phone.

Admittedly, it is very dangerous to use mobile phone in a taking off or landing plane, all the electric equipments should been turning off during that time. But during other flying time, passengers could use some electric equipments, like notebook, why can't a passenger use a mobile phone under flight mode? It means a mobile phone can't broadcast any radio, but a passenger could play games and take photos with it.

In a word, I believe passengers should be allowed to use mobile phone in bus and trains since it is necessary and helpful. I also suggest that passengers should be allowed to use a mobile phone under flight mode during horizontal flying in plane, because it does no negative impact.

mileschen2008UID: 2771287

你好，今天元旦节，学校的各个教室都不开了。宿舍又上不了网，我现在是在图书馆的一个角落里上网的，冷死了。
所以，修改意见可能要等到明天才能给你了，希望你能够体谅！
谢谢！不好意思。

-----------------------------------------------

xiongcan818UID: 2849571

楼上条件真艰苦啊~
修改好，见附件。

great与众不同UID: 2558121

2011-01-01
题目：Some people think children should study and play. Others think they should help with household chores. What do you think?

Recently, people have been discussing that whether children should focus all their energy on studying and playing or help with housework. While some people claim that children could learn a lot from studying and playing, but I take the opposite side that children should learn to do some housework.

The first reason why I hold this opinion is that children doing some housework is beneficial to both children and their parents. For children, they could have more sense of study, because by hard working of housework, children could learn that as a member in the family, they must do something for it. Therefore, they will be a responsible member in a wok group in the future. For parents, they also should require children to do some housework, because most adults will feel very tired after a working for whole day, and they must be even upset if there is a lot of housework waiting at home. Within children's help, parents may feel more relax.

Furthermore, demanding children to do some housework is beneficial to the society. In the short term, it could improve the production of society, because as the mention before, adults may get better working form in company. In the long term, the society may be full of responsibility, because the former opinion that doing housework could teach children what responsibility is, and responsible adults could hold the whole society up.

Admittedly, children could learn knowledge from playing and studying, but they also could learn a lot from doing housework. What's more, they can get some practice experience, which can't be received from class. In addition, studying for too long time is harmful to their eyes, and without adults' overseeing, children may playing some dangerous games.

In a word, I disagree with the quote that children should focus on only playing and studying, and I believe they should help with housework sine it is good for themselves, their parents, and the society.

tiandiyouyongUID: 2793862

10# great与众不同


Some people think children should study and play. Others think they should help with household chores. What do you think?, {) A2 m( i* a# j) W& G( o
( m: @0 g, s: @7 \0 \) |  H
Recently, people have been discussing that whether children should focus all their energy on studying and playing or help with housework. While some people claim that children could learn a lot from studying and playing, but I take the opposite side that children should learn to do some housework.
7 N  Y( q& Z9 `6 v* v
The first reason why I hold this opinion is that children doing这里好像不太对 some housework is beneficial to both children and their parents. For children, they could have more sense of study is able to increase their sense of study, because by hard working of housework, children could learn that as a member in the family, they must do something for it. Therefore, they will be a responsible member in a wok group in the futuregood team worker who knows the definition of responsibility. For parents, they also should require children to do some housework, because most adults will feel very tired after a working for whole day, and they must be even upset if there is a lot of housework waiting at home. Within children's help, parents may feel more relax.# ]7 `# z4 ]% J& Z. Y/ I

Furthermore, demanding children to do some housework is beneficial to the society. In the short term, it could improve the production of society, because as the mention before, adults may get better working job form in from company. In the a long term, the society may be full of responsibility, because the former opinion that doing housework could teach children what responsibility is, and responsible adults could hold the whole society up.

Admittedly, children could learn knowledge from playing and studying, but they also could learn a lot from doing housework. What's more, they can get some practice experience, which can't be received from class. In addition, studying for too long time is harmful to their eyes, and without adults' overseeing, children may playing some dangerous games." H0 H. [: P' N5 k9 c& Q

In a word, I disagree with the quote that children should focus on only playing and studying, and I believe they should help with housework sine it is good for themselves, their parents, and the society.

tiandiyouyongUID: 2793862

10# great与众不同

xiongcan818UID: 2849571

0101已经修改好。见附件。

great与众不同UID: 2558121

2010-1-4
题目： Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become a financially responsible adult, people should be taught how to manage money at an early age.

Recently, people have been discussing that whether children should be taught how to manage money in order to become a financially responsible adults. While some people claim that it is too hard for children to learn the management of money, but I take the opposite side that it is really necessary for children to learn how to manage money.

The first reason why I hold this opinion is that learning the management of money is beneficial for both children and their parents. For children, learning how to manage money is good for their both physic and psychological health, because it is hard for young children to decide what is right and what is wrong. People should teach them that they shouldn't buy anything dangerous or they may hurt themselves and other people. In addition, children also should be taught that they shouldn't spend money as much as they want, or they may be spoiled. For parents, they also hope children to learn how to manage money, because it could lighten their economic pressure. The main way children getting money is asking their parents, and it is hard to parents to refuse children's demand. So if children know how to manage money, parents could have more money to develop the family, such as to buy a bigger house.

Second, the society expect children to learn how to manage money. In the short term, children could save spare money and contribute them to public causes. Children could be taught to save money and donate it on social development. In the long term, there will be more economic experts in the future, thanks to education at an early age, people may be sensitive about money. It makes them be interested in and good at economic studying in the future.

Admittedly, it may be hard for children to learn how to manage money at beginning, but they may soon get the skill because a popular notion is that children could learn new knowledge quickly. Children have high intelligence in studying.

In a word, I agree with the quote that people should be taught how to manage money at an early age since it is so necessary for children, their parents, and the society. The hardship of teaching children how to manage money is temporary, and the benefits are permanent.

冬咚宝UID: 2956480

Some people think children should study and play. Others think they should help with household chores. What do you think?,Recently, people have been discussing that whether children should focus all their energy on studying and playing or helping with housework. While some people claim that children could learn a lot from studying and playing, but I take the opposite side that children should learn to do some housework
4 u2 L- G5 Z; T3 }0 JThe first reason why I hold this opinion is that children删掉 doing这里好像不太对 some housework is beneficial to both children and their parents. For children, they could have more sense of study is able to increase their sense of study, 什么意思？because by hard working of
改成at housework, children could learn that as a member in the family, they must do something for it. Therefore, they will be a responsible member in a wok group in the future and a good team worker who knows the definition of responsibility 改成 understands the meaning of responsibility well. For parents, they also should require children to do some housework, because most adults will feel very tired after a working for 改成after a whole day working whole day, and they must be even upset if there is a lot of housework waiting at home. Within →with their children's help, parents may feel more relax G# G5 v; Z- b→relaxed
Furthermore, demanding children to do some housework is beneficial to the society. In the short term, it could improve the production of society, because as the mention before→as we have mentioned before, adults may get better working job form in删掉 from company. In the a long term, the society may be full of responsibility→responsible workers, because the former opinion that doing housework could teach children what responsibility is, and responsible adults could hold the whole society up.7 x3 f: ?$ c5 ]- s6 |6 W
/ l- \& o1 R& Y& W0 f5 r
Admittedly, children could learn knowledge from playing and studying, but they also could learn a lot from doing housework. What's more, they can get some practice experience, which can't be received from class. In addition, studying for too删掉 long time is harmful to their eyes, and without adults' overseeing, children may playing some dangerous games.
+ g% y1 T  R, [4 v# x( HIn a word, I disagree with the quote that children should focus on only playing and studying, and I believe they should help with housework sine→since it is good for themselves, their parents, and the society.