- 最后登录
- 2010-6-9
- 在线时间
- 203 小时
- 寄托币
- 1047
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-5
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 3
- 积分
- 891
- UID
- 181125

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1047
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-5
- 精华
- 3
- 帖子
- 2
|
发表于 2005-7-26 18:03:44
|显示全部楼层
优点就不说了, 光说缺点了
"Education encourages students to question and criticize, and therefore does little to promote social harmony."
In my opinion, it is one of the responsibilities functions较好 of the education system to encourage students to question and criticize, and which will which would help promote the social harmony. Of course, the question and criticize is the extent of question and criticism should be in the proper range.
In today's technologically advanced society, the education develops better than before, especially in the developing country. Tutors teach and encourage students to know and analyze the world in their spectrums instead of just cramming the knowledge. The students absorb knowledge and ponder questions objectively instead of just remembering something in order to pass the examinations. Such person is the right one who will contribute to the development of country greatly. 这一句有问题 Because he or she has the ability to speculate and deal with the reality problem. He or she will not admire authority too much and believe the authority is all right in at any time, in any case. That is to say; they will would watch the world in the questionable judicious and critical eyes, which will accelerate the development of the civilization. 这一句到下句的跳跃太大,the development of the civilization ~~ social harmony没说清楚 Only under the close examination and scrutiny, can the flaws or limitation be found, then be adjusted, including the society. So, to some extent, the question and criticize promote the development of society.
两段之间没过渡
The editorial claims that does little to promote social harmony. In the first place, how to define the "social harmony"? If there is not any question or criticize about the society, is that represent the social harmony? The answer is no. No critic criticism does no means the society is too perfect to question, the most possibility is people not dare to express the critic criticism, take the autocracy period as the example, in that time, the kings autocrats was were always right whatever he said, if anyone questioned or criticized must be punished, even killed. Another possibility is people have not the ability or knowledge to find the question, such instance is countless in science realm, otherwise is rare in social field, because everyone is one part of the society and everyone can find the question certain questions of society. Based on what discussed above, it is clearly that there is no any causal relationship between the critic and hamper social harmony. criticism and the sabotage of social harmony
文章是要针对education 的一个作用说他对social harmony 的作用,education是therefore does 的主语,但此段几乎美提及education
Adversely, to some extent, the critic will help promote social harmony. A famous philosopher said that the person would criticize what he favors. Common sense tells us that people always pay more attention to and critic criticize what he or she really cares. Just because people care about it, they are discontented ^about the flaws of it and hope it become better and better, same to the social.?? discontented ~~ social progress 没说清楚 The important step of getting progress is finding the shortcoming. Only when finding the flaws and defects, can we adjust and rectify it. The question and criticize criticism will benefit the development of society.
Moreover, what the education offer to students is not only the question and criticize, but also other ability, such as how to communicate and cooperate with each other, how to deal with the problem in the harmony atmosphere. All these abilities will do a great favor to the social harmony. 这段要是展开说就好了
To sum up, the education encourages students not only to question and criticize, but also to communicate and cooperate, and will does much to promote social harmony. |
|