issue51 高频题,我也来试试^_^大家拍啊~~

11yvetteUID: 2102418

----题目----
51"Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."

----提纲----
B1 我们探讨教育问题应以不同教育时期的目标作不同讨论
B2 站在国家和社会的角度讨论初级,中级教育应以统一大纲为准设置课程
B3 对于学生个人来说,处于初级中级教育阶段也应按照大纲学习
B4 高等教育就不同,应设置各类专业让学生选择自己需要和喜欢的

----正文----
The topic is argued for a long time that many people believe that specifically designed educational system would push students' ardor on learning together with some others' insist on the oppsite view that specifically designed curriculum do not have the effects as it expects. However, the problem is not such simple that only approving or objecting can deal with. Different educational stages such as primarily education, secondary education and higher education, basic educational purpose that "learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together, and learning to be" which was stated in Paris 1996 by UNESCO and so forth are all the factors we should examine first in order to give a didact perspective to judge the effectiveness of education.

To begin with, we should consider that distinct educational stage has its own purpose. For primary and secondary education, they introduce students to the skills and information first, and then expand knowledge of subjects, different with which, higher education is focusing on qualifying the individual for professional activity. We can not put them on the table simultaneously to discuss the characteristics and effects as we can not put two sides of a coin at a time. So we would like to explain what we have considered respectively.

In my point of view the most effective way for primary and secondary education setting their curriculum is that basing on the sylabus given by the nation which could optimize the national general control to attain the goal of education. Our country is still a developing country, there is no such condition and capital for all the regions to design specifically in order to meet the students' interests and needs. If there are some provinces set the courses to satisfy students, the ignorance of fairy would arouse unsatisfaction in a large scale, and more important the national knowledge level and structure are distinct from rural to urban, from advance region to laggered area. It impedes achieving to the aim of education, as a result, from the perspective of nation and society, primary and secondary education would decrease the differences among different areas and gradually improve the whole knowledge level of our nation on the basis of a general sylabus.

On the other hand, for the students themselves, the generally designed courses would help them to the largest extent to manage the knowledge. Although interests and needs would stimulate students' learning desire and maybe lead them to a good status of studying, students at that age have not had a good judgement on what they really like. For example, they may only know the fresh noun of a subject that sounds funny and attractive, then they choose that subject. After learning for a while, they began to feel dull and then what should they do? Quiting the course or still going on with a depressed mind on learning it? It is so serious a problem for both students and teachers, there is not much time for teenagers to linguish. Moreover, suppose that the interests and needs make the students do well in the courses, the basic purpose we mentioned above is only attained to aspects in "learning to know, learning to do", but "learning to get together, and learning to be" are still blank to them by only concentrating on what they favor alone, which do not promote the integrity among the students. The four aspects together only represent a good educational system, without one, the effectiveness would be discounted.

Let us cast our nets to the higher education which brings specialists to the society, it would adopt the specifically designed curriculum to the students as it is now. After almost 12 years training and directing, students who decide to attend to the university, begin to know what they really prefer and have their own criteria on choosing majors. How can we imagine that if the higher education is still generally controlled by the sylabus as the situation in primary and secondary education, the society would lack dozens of professional individuals but own a large amount of attendants, and then university is not the true one but debases to the secondary school or even elementary school which seems so terrible. Thus, the higher education would keep its own quality on the freely-choosing-major system.

To sum up, the issue on whether the education should employ the specifically designed courses or generally designed courses is clearly after the discussion. Due to balance the national and social knowledge structure in different areas as well as containing the four aspect of purpose, systematic sylabus suits the primary and secondary education properly, while introducing the specialists to the society, the best choice for higher education is that maintaining the customized educational system.

谢谢大家拍,留链接必回拍^_^

chan1983UID: 166440

The topic is argued for a long time that many people believe that specifically designed educational system would push students' ardor on learning together with（while） some others' insist on the opposite（opposite） view that specifically designed curriculum do not have the effects as it expects. However, the problem is not such simple that only approving or objecting can deal with. Different educational stages such as primarily education, secondary education and higher education, basic educational purpose that "learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together, and learning to be" which was stated in Paris 1996 by UNESCO and so forth are all the factors we should examine first in order to give a didact perspective to judge the effectiveness of education.

To begin with, we should consider that distinct educational stage has its own purpose. For primary and secondary education, they introduce students to the skills and information first（是不是introduce ..to students呢?）, and then expand knowledge of subjects, different with which, higher education is focusing on qualifying the individual for professional activity. We can not put them on the table simultaneously to discuss the characteristics and effects as we can not put two sides of a coin at a time.（good） So we would like to explain what we have considered respectively.

In my point of view the most effective way for primary and secondary education setting their curriculum is that basing（be based on） on the sylabus given by the nation which could optimize the national general control to attain the goal of education. Our country is still a developing country, there is no such condition and capital for all the regions to design specifically in order to meet the students' interests and needs. If there are some provinces set the courses to satisfy students, the ignorance of fairy（fairness） would arouse unsatisfaction in a large scale, and more important the national knowledge level and structure are distinct from rural to urban, from advance（advanced） region to laggered area. It impedes achieving to the aim of education, as a result, from the perspective of nation and society, primary and secondary education would decrease the differences among different areas and gradually improve the whole knowledge level of our nation on the basis of a general sylabus.（最后语义局好像有问题，缺少连接词）

On the other hand, for the students themselves, the generally designed courses would help them to the largest extent to manage the knowledge. Although interests and needs would stimulate students' learning desire and maybe lead them to a good status of studying, students at that age have not had a good judgement on what they really like. For example, they may only know the fresh noun（fresh noun是指名字吗?） of a subject that sounds funny and attractive, then they choose that subject. After learning for a while, they began to feel dull and then what should they do? Quiting the course or still going on with a depressed mind on learning it? It is so serious a problem for both students and teachers, there is not much time for teenagers to linguish. （有点不懂，上面说的跟语言教学有什么关系呢?）Moreover, suppose that the interests and needs make the students do well in the courses, the basic purpose we mentioned above is only attained to aspects in "learning to know, learning to do", but "learning to get together, and learning to be" are still blank to them by only concentrating on what they favor alone, which do not promote the integrity among the students. The four aspects together only represent a good educational system, without one, the effectiveness would be discounted.

Let us cast our nets to the higher education which brings specialists to the society, it would adopt the specifically designed curriculum to the students as it is now. After almost 12 years training and directing, students who decide to attend to the university, begin to know what they really prefer and have their own criteria on choosing majors. How can we imagine that if the higher education is still generally controlled by the sylabus as the situation in primary and secondary education, the society would lack dozens of professional individuals but own a large amount of attendants, and then university is not the true one but debases to the secondary school or even elementary school which seems so terrible. Thus, the higher education would keep its own quality on the freely-choosing-major system.

To sum up, the issue on whether the education should employ the specifically designed courses or generally designed courses is clearly after the discussion. Due to balance the national and social knowledge structure in different areas as well as containing the four aspect of purpose, systematic sylabus suits the primary and secondary education properly, while introducing the specialists to the society, the best choice for higher education is that maintaining the customized educational system.
ps: 文章写得很长啊！并且有无数长句，pf.，我看了感觉很吃力。思路结构也很清晰，a fine issue
Sylabus好像写错了~~~~
下面是我的，写得比较烂的说:(
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... ghlight=%2Bchan1983

GladysryUID: 198609

The topic is argued for a long time that many people believe that specifically designed educational system would push students' ardor on learning together with some others' insist on the oppsite view that specifically designed curriculum do not have the effects as it expects. However, the problem is not such simple that only approving or objecting can deal with. Different educational stages such as primarily education, secondary education and higher education,这中间是不是加点儿衔接？否则这么长一句话，看到中间还以为谓语宾语都没了。 basic educational purpose恩，你这里是想说基础教育的目的，还是教育的基本目的？ that "learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together, and learning to be" which was stated in Paris 1996 by UNESCO and so forth are all the factors we should examine first in order to give a didact perspective to judge the effectiveness of education.观点是一上来就表明了，可是最好把句子改一下，虽然长句反映写作水平，可是太长的句子还是有些不好看的，特别是并列起来，有的名词既然要很长，中间还是给点儿衔接为好。我这一段读得不是很顺。

To begin with, we should consider that distinct educational stage has its own purpose. For primary and secondary education, they introduce students to the skills and information first, and then expand knowledge of subjects, 这句话是不是应该有个系动词？different with which, higher education is focusing on qualifying the individual for professional activity. We can not put them on the table simultaneously to discuss the characteristics and effects as we can not put two sides of a coin at a time. So we would like to explain what we have considered respectively.再次感觉，句子好难懂。:LFor primary and secondary education, the priority should be the introducing of skills and information rather than the expanding knowledge of subjects, which are quite different from higher education whose focus is primarily on qualifying the individuals for professional activity.会不会感觉清晰一些？（个人意见，大家可以探讨一下）
In my point of view the most effective way for primary and secondary education setting their curriculum is that basing on the sylabus given by the nation which could optimize the national general control to attain the goal of education病句，that后面跟完整句子，而很显然你后面的不定式也不可能作为主语，主谓具缺。. Our country is still a developing country,我认为直接大众化，说For most develeping countries,也许会更具有代表性 there is no such condition and capital for all the regions to design specifically in order to meet the students' interests and needs. If there are去掉 some provinces set the courses to satisfy students, the ignorance of fairy would arouse unsatisfaction in a large scale, and more important the national knowledge level and structure are distinct from rural to urban你是想表达一种可能性么？那么最好不要用表示事实的系动词, from advance region to laggered/lagging area. It impedes achieving to不要 the aim of education, as a result,你的分析有说统一大纲有什么好处么？直接来这么个结果？反驳对立的坏处并不一定代表非对立面就好。应该加一句过渡，比如说"however, a general sylabus' building would be more practicle and approach the aim more easily. Therefore, from the perspective of nation and society, primary and secondary education would decrease the differences among different areas and gradually improve the whole knowledge level of our nation on the basis of a general sylabus.

On the other hand, for the students themselves, the generally designed courses would help them to the largest extent to manage the knowledge. Although interests and needs would stimulate students' learning desire and maybe may吧？ lead them to a good status of studying, students at that age have not had a good judgement on what they really like. For example, they may only know the fresh noun of a subject that sounds funny and attractive, then they choose that subject. After learning for a while, they began to feel dull and then what should they do? Quiting the course or still going on with a depressed mind on learning it? It is so serious a problem for both students and teachers, there is not much time for teenagers to linguish？？？. Moreover, suppose that the interests and needs make the students do well in the courses, the basic purpose we mentioned above is only attained to aspects in "learning to know, learning to do", but "learning to get together, and learning to be" are still blank to them by only concentrating on what they favor alone, which do not promote the integrity among the students. The four aspects together only represent a good educational system, without one, the effectiveness would be discounted.还是说一说有一个统一的大纲又会有怎样的好处吧？毕竟你要表达的是大纲对他们的好处，而不是自己选择的坏处。

不加个过渡语么？Let us cast our nets to the higher education which brings specialists to the society, it would adopt the specifically designed curriculum to the students as it is now. After almost 12 years training and directing, students who decide to attend to the删了 university, begin to know what they really prefer and have their own criteria on choosing majors. How can we imagine that if the higher education is still generally controlled by the sylabus as the situation in primary and secondary education, the society would lack dozens of professional individuals but own a large amount of attendants, and then university is not the true one but debases这是使倒退的意思，换一个词吧 to the secondary school or even elementary school which seems so terrible. Thus, the higher education would改成should表明你的观点，而不是高等教育的将来 keep its own quality on the freely-choosing-major system.

To sum up, the issue on whether the education should employ the specifically designed courses or generally designed courses is clearly-clear after the discussion. Due to :confused:由于？？？是为了吧？balance the national and social knowledge structure in different areas as well as containing the four aspect of purpose, systematic sylabus suits the primary and secondary education properly, while introducing the specialists to the society, the best choice for higher education is that maintaining the customized educational system.表示目的还是用不定式吧。你这里的表语从句又是不完整的。

你的思路很清晰，用来说明问题也很好，论证要注意你所想说的与对立面是什么关系，否则是没有说服力的。最头疼的是你的表达，如果写长句并不是很擅长，为什么不用更清楚地短句呢？我在看这篇文章的时候觉得整个头都是大的，因为要分析你的句子结构，如果清晰还好说，可是你又出现了很多不清楚甚至是语法的错误，其实，把思路说清楚才是最主要的。不过，如果你认为你写得很顺的话，也许你在不知不觉地“stream of consciousness",而忽略了句子的结构。

11yvetteUID: 2102418

55555555555,发现自己发错了
刚才发的那个是最初写了没有修改的,55555555555
以下的这个好像才是自己写了修改的:

The topic is argued for a long time that many people believe that specifically designed educational system would push students' ardor on learning while some others' insist on the opposite view that specifically designed curriculum do not have the effects as it expects. However, the problem is not such simple that only approving or objecting can deal with. Different educational stages such as primarily education, secondary education and higher education, basic educational purpose that "learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together, and learning to be" which was stated in Paris 1996 by UNESCO and so forth are all the factors we should examine first in order to give a dialectic perspective to judge the effectiveness of education.

To begin with, we should consider that distinct educational stage has its own purpose. For primary and secondary education, they introduce students to the skills and information first, and then expand knowledge of subjects, and different with which, higher education is focusing on qualifying the individual for professional activity. We can not put them on the table simultaneously to discuss the characteristics and effects as we can not put two sides of a coin up at a time. So we would like to explain what we have considered respectively.

In my point of view the most effective way for primary and secondary education setting their curriculum is that basing on the syllabus given by the nation which could optimize the national general control to attain the goal of education. Our country is still a developing country, so there is no such condition and capital for all the regions to design specifically in order to meet the students' interests and needs. If there are some provinces set the courses to satisfy students, the ignorance of fairy would arouse dissatisfaction in a large scale, and more important the national knowledge level and structure are distinct from rural to urban, from advance region to lagger one, and the students would not serve the nation well someday in the future. It impedes achieving to the aim of education. As a result, from the perspective of nation and society, primary and secondary education would decrease the differences among different areas and gradually improve the whole knowledge level of our nation on the basis of a general syllabus.

On the other hand, for the students themselves, the generally designed courses would help them to the largest extent to manage the knowledge. Although interests and needs would stimulate students' learning desire and maybe lead them to a good status of studying, students at that age have not had a good judgment on what they really like. For example, they have just heard the fresh noun of a subject that sounds funny and attractive, and then they choose that subject. After learning for a while, they begin to feel dull but what should they do? Quitting the course or still going on with a depressed mind on learning it? It is so serious a problem for both students and teachers, there is not much time for teenagers to squander. Moreover, suppose that the interests and needs make the students do well in the courses, the basic purpose we mentioned above is only attained to aspects in "learning to know, learning to do", but "learning to get together, and learning to be" are still blank to them by only concentrating on what they favor alone, which do not promote the integrity among the students. The four aspects together as a whole only evaluates a good educational system, without one, the effectiveness would be discounted.

Let us cast our nets to the higher education which brings specialists to the society, it would adopt the specifically designed curriculum to the students as it is now. After almost 12 years’ training and directing, students who decide to step into the university begin to know what they really prefer and have their own criteria on choosing majors. How can we imagine that if the higher education is still generally controlled by the syllabus as the situation in primary and secondary education, the society would lack dozens of professional individuals but own a large amount of attendants, and then university is not the true one but debases to the secondary school or even elementary school which seems so terrible. Thus, the higher education would keep its own quality on the freely-choosing-major system.

To sum up, the issue on whether the education should employ the specifically designed courses or generally designed courses is clearly after the discussion. Due to balance the national and social knowledge structure in different areas as well as containing the four aspects of purpose, systematic syllabus suits the primary and secondary education properly, while introducing the specialists to the society, the best choice for higher education is that maintaining the customized educational system.

tangentUID: 209829

----题目----
51"Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."

----提纲----
B1 我们探讨教育问题应以不同教育时期的目标作不同讨论
B2 站在国家和社会的角度讨论初级,中级教育应以统一大纲为准设置课程
B3 对于学生个人来说,处于初级中级教育阶段也应按照大纲学习
B4 高等教育就不同,应设置各类专业让学生选择自己需要和喜欢的

----正文----
The topic is argued for a long time that many people believe that specifically designed educational system would push students' ardor on learning together with some others' insist on the oppsite view that specifically designed curriculum do not have the effects as it expects. However, the problem is not such simple that only approving or objecting can deal with. Different educational stages such as primarily education, secondary education and higher education, basic educational purpose that "learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together, and learning to be" which was stated in Paris 1996 by UNESCO and so forth are all the factors we should examine first in order to give a didact perspective to judge the effectiveness of education.

To begin with, we should consider that distinct educational stage has its own purpose. For primary and secondary education, they introduce students to the skills and information first, and then expand knowledge of subjects,要有连词吧different with which, higher education is focusing on qualifying the individual for professional activity. We can not put them on the table simultaneously to discuss the characteristics and effects as we can not put two sides of a coin at a time. So we would like to explain what we have considered respectively.

In my point of view the most effective way for primary and secondary education setting their curriculum is that basing on the sylabus given by the nation which could optimize the national general control to attain the goal of education. Our country is still a developing country,表明是什么国家，for instance, in china there is no such condition and capital for all the regions to design specifically in order to meet the students' interests and needs.但是如果在美国呢？ If there are some provinces set the courses to satisfy students, the ignorance of fairy would arouse unsatisfaction in a large scale, and more important the national knowledge level and structure are distinct from rural to urban, from advance region to laggered area. It impedes achieving to the aim of education, as a result, from the perspective of nation and society, primary and secondary education would decrease the differences among different areas and gradually improve the whole knowledge level of our nation on the basis of a general sylabus.论证这个论点，应该从小学是基本教育，基本的知识是大家都应该掌握的

On the other hand, for the students themselves, the generally designed courses would help them to the largest extent to manage the knowledge. Although interests and needs would stimulate students' learning desire and maybe lead them to a good status of studying, students at that age have not had a good judgement on what they really like. For example, they may only know the fresh noun of a subject that sounds funny and attractive, then they choose that subject. After learning for a while, they began to feel dull and then what should they do?这个问句不好guess what will they do? Quiting the course or still going on with a depressed mind on learning it? It is so serious a problem for both students and teachers, there is not much time for teenagers to linguish. Moreover, suppose that the interests and needs make the students do well in the courses, the basic purpose we mentioned above is only attained to aspects in "learning to know, learning to do", but "learning to get together, and learning to be" are still blank to them by only concentrating on what they favor alone, which do not promote the integrity among the students. The four aspects together only represent a good educational system,连词 without one, the effectiveness would be discounted.这段论证还是充分的

Let us cast our nets to the higher education which brings specialists to the society, it would adopt the specifically designed curriculum to the students as it is now. After almost 12 years training and directing, students who decide to attend to the university, begin to know what they really prefer and have their own criteria on choosing majors. How can we imagine that if the higher education is still generally controlled by the sylabus as the situation in primary and secondary education, the society would lack dozens of professional individuals but own a large amount of attendants, and then university is not the true one but debases to the secondary school or even elementary school which seems so terrible. Thus, the higher education would keep its own quality on the freely-choosing-major system.

To sum up, the issue on whether the education should employ the specifically designed courses or generally designed courses is clearly after the discussion. Due to balance the national and social knowledge structure in different areas as well as containing the four aspect of purpose, systematic sylabus suits the primary and secondary education properly, while introducing the specialists to the society, the best choice for higher education is that maintaining the customized educational system.提纲是很明确，我觉得只是第一点不够充分和令人信服。和前两楼的一样意见，不一定要用长句，而且你用了长句就忘了连词