issue190 G-89-互助社-13日写作 艺术高频 大家给点意见

huangdaoUID: 190018

没有按常规的思路写 不知道可不可以

Issue190 Arts 第16篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：51分22秒  442 words 507
从2005年7月13日11时59分到2005年7月13日12时51分
------题目------
As long as people in a society are hungry or out of work or lack the basic skills needed to survive, the use of public resources to support the arts is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—when one considers all the potential uses of such money.
------提纲------
1 开头
2 有很多其他办法扶贫
3 不能因为物质而忽略精神
4 结尾
------正文------
When a person nearly starving notice that huge amount of money are offered to the arts which could do nothing, in their views, to the improvement of society, it is cruel for them to comprehend all the potential uses of those public resources. Yet, does it mean the government should not supply art, when there are some people in starvation? The problem needs to solve in both sides: other solutions for these dilemma, and the balance between the art and other areas.

Firstly, there are many solutions to deal with the problem. On the one hand, there are other funds of government helping people in poverty. Each year, the government would offer a lot of society resources to the people who are poor or lack of the basic skills, such as the short-term training class which are prepared for the people who are lack of professional technology for living, the fund which is given to the group of people who lose the abilities to work, and so on. There are unnecessary to deprive the resources supplied to art if the policies carry out, and the funds for the people are sufficient. On the other hand, even if the funds are not enough for the need, are there not other solutions, but the resources for arts? Where there is a will, there is a way. The power of society should be taken into account. Nowadays, many no-profit or profitable organizations lend their hands to the help of saving the persons who are in a dilemma of life. They also through varies means to release their light, like offering more free professional classes, supplying more jobs opportunities which do not need much skills, and directly providing the money and necessity of life, etc. As mentioned above, there are plentiful methods for settle the problem, no need to take the resources of art.

Secondly, as the speaker said, is it worthy to provide the resources for arts to the people who are hungry, or out of work, or lack the basic skills needed to survive? There is a question needed to answer:  whether the art should be sacrificed for the physical need. Actually, the realistic need for survive is elementary, but that does not mean the need of art is unnecessary. As discussed before, there are other solutions for the problem, even if there is no other method, the abandon of art's resources should be carefully considered. Without art people's lives would drop into a pale world, no music, no picture, and the like. As a famous political leader said (as I paraphrase): the physical culture and the mental culture are the two legs of our society. Thus, the decision should be carefully ruminated. Maybe there is a suitable balance between the funds offering the two areas.

To conclude, the deprivation from the fund of art is a dilemma. Yet, other methods should be referred to, including the government itself and the society. Even if those are not sufficient, a deliberate balance between the two needs should be carefully considered.

vickycy6UID: 2107893

明天有空来看看吧;)

Smile_IreneUID: 198388

一会儿看，先顶一下

Smile_IreneUID: 198388

When a person nearly starving notice that huge amount of money are offered to the arts which could do nothing, in their views, to the improvement of society(改成to improve the welfare condition of society怎么样？), it is cruel for them to comprehend all the potential uses of those public resources. Yet, does it mean the government should not supply art, when there are some people in starvation? The problem needs to be solved in both sides: other solutions for these dilemma, and the balance between the art and other areas.

Firstly, there are many solutions to deal with the problem. On the one hand, there are other funds of government would help people in poverty. Each year, the government would offer a lot of society resources to the people who are poor or lack of the basic skills, such as the short-term training class which are prepared for the people who are lack of professional technology for living, the fund which is given to the group of people who lose the abilities to work, and so on. There are unnecessary to deprive the resources supplied to art if the policies carry out, and the funds for the people are sufficient. (这个理由有点牵强，政府资金是有限的，用于艺术的多了，自然扶贫的就少了）On the other hand, even if the funds are not enough for the needs, are there not other solutions, but the resources for arts(are there any other solutions besides the resources for arts觉得这么说更顺一些)? Where there is a will, there is a way. The power of society should be taken into account. Nowadays, many no-profit or profitable organizations lend their hands helping the people in poverty.(dilemma 主要指进退两难不知如何选择的困境）  They also throughvarious means to release their light, like offering more free professional classes, supplying more jobs opportunities which do not need much skills, and directly providing the money and necessity of life, etc. As mentioned above, there are plentiful methods to settle the problem, there is no need to take the resources supporting for art.

Secondly, as the speaker said, is it worthy to provide the resources for arts to the people who are hungry, or out of work, or lack the basic skills needed to survive? There is a question needed to answer:  whether the art should be sacrificed for the physical need. Actually, the realistic need for survive is elementary, but that does not mean the need of art is unnecessary. As discussed before, there are other solutions for the problem, even if there is no other method, the abandon of art's resources(the resources for art) should be carefully considered. Without art people's lives would drop into a pale world, no music, no picture, and the like. As a famous political leader said (as I paraphrase): the physical culture and the mental culture are the two legs of our society. Thus, the decision should be carefully ruminated. Maybe there is a suitable balance between the funds offering the two areas.

To conclude, the deprivation from the fund of art is a dilemma. Yet, other methods should be referred to, including the government itself and the society. Even if those are not sufficient, a deliberate balance between the two needs should be carefully considered.

huangdaoUID: 190018

There are unnecessary to deprive the resources supplied to art, if the policies carry out, and the funds for the people are sufficient. (这个理由有点牵强，政府资金是有限的，用于艺术的多了，自然扶贫的就少了）

我在文中提到if 是说如果有钱的话就不必了 后面也提到了 如果没钱的话 会有什么样的办法

呵呵

polymathUID: 179557

武汉高频！本来还想来改的！晚了一步！:L就地学习下！