Issue11 Fanasy小组 9.5 ISSUE作业.

irenemimiUID：2120985

Issue11:
题目："All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."
提纲：
论点：反对。认为不可能实践
论证：
1．不同的国家有不同的需要解决的社会问题，全球性大学不能解决每个国家的问题，即使是面对同一个问题，不同文化背景，宗教信仰的人给出的答案和态度也是不同的。
2．就学校方面而言，由于学生来自不同国家，难道要配备不同语言的翻译家，专家，宗教家和心理学家吗？如果配备的话，其花费和这大学最后能带给大家的研究结果相比，哪个更有效？
3．解决社会问题需要政府参与管理和支持，教育不能从根本上解决问题
4．诚然，建立全球性大学也有好处，方便交流等，但同样可以采用其他方式交流，并不需要建立全球性大学。
总结.
正文：
The speaker prefer to build a global university to help solve the world's most persistent social problems, I disagree with the speaker, though his idea is quite good, it is impossible to turn it into practice. I will discuss this from three aspects.

Firstly, different nations will have different persistent social problems themselves, education such as global university are likely to solve all the problems of different countries. For instance, developing countries are more concentrate on poverty, lose-job, disease, and education and population problems while developed countries are focus on energy, and environment protected, the development of technology and social boons. As one thing happens between China and America, Chinese is suffering of the population problem, but American even doesn’t know what the problem is. How could these differences not stop the development of global university?

However, as if all nations are facing one same problem, they could also give different attitudes. Because these students come from different countries with different culture backgrounds and religions, they have different value and Weltanschauung. So build a global university could not essentially solve the social problems. About war, American will take the Muslim as a danger to their security due to the 9.11 Event, but some Arabian who religion the Muslim will see it as a saintly action.

Secondly, consider from school's aspect, according to these students from different nations, uniform educated form is difficult to practice. If we develop an university like this, should we need to have every languages' translators, experts, culture coordinates, religionists, or psychologists? This problem is quite realism, and not easily be solved. Furthermore, compare the cost that these actions needs with the results of the university may investigate to world's social problems, which one is more effective?

Moreover, solving such social problem need manage and support by the government, not only by education. Such social problems appear as result from the government's neglect, such as theft. One becomes a thief is owing to his poverty and hunger. If the government could solve the problems of poverty, and have some punishment to the thief, the theft problem would be solved at the same time. What education could do is just tell the social by morality, it could not prohibit the problem in practice. Only when the government and education work together may have effect on it.

Admittedly, the obvious advantage of such kind of a global university, such as sharing information, exchanging experience, or mutual cooperation could not be ignored anyway. The nations all around the world could set up other relatively communication to talk about the problem and showing their own ideas together, such as terrorists are the most global problem these years. All nations government and other people could associate with each other to think how to forbidden them.

In sum, it is not real to develop a global university to solve the world's most persistent social problems, the different culture background could not make every countries turn unanimous to a problems, the university is facing a series assumptions may not be solved, and the most important is that university students haven't such ability to change them, it needs government's manage and support. Even a global university is build up; it could not go a long way toward solving many different social problems.

这次努力尝试限时写了,但还是没能完成..........超过大概10分钟吧~~完了,而且写好后往WORD里一帖, 好多红线和绿线,都是最基本的一些错误,晕啊......

weiweizhuUID：179352

论点：反对。认为不可能实践
论证：
1．不同的国家有不同的需要解决的社会问题，全球性大学不能解决每个国家的问题，即使是面对同一个问题，不同文化背景，宗教信仰的人给出的答案和态度也是不同的。
2．就学校方面而言，由于学生来自不同国家，难道要配备不同语言的翻译家，专家，宗教家和心理学家吗？如果配备的话，其花费和这大学最后能带给大家的研究结果相比，哪个更有效？
3．解决社会问题需要政府参与管理和支持，教育不能从根本上解决问题
4．诚然，建立全球性大学也有好处，方便交流等，但同样可以采用其他方式交流，并不需要建立全球性大学。
总结.
正文：
The speaker prefer to build a global university to help solve the world's most persistent social problems, I disagree with the speaker, though his idea is quite good(你这样说不就等于同意作者观点了吗，我觉得seems quite good at first glance会好一些）, it is impossible to turn it into practice. I will discuss this from three aspects.

Firstly, different nations will have different persistent social problems themselves, education such as global university are likely to solve all the problems of different countries. For instance, developing countries are more concentrate on poverty, lose-job, disease, and education and population problems while developed countries are focus on energy, and environment protected, the development of technology and social boons.(我觉得挺好的） As one thing happens between China and America, Chinese is suffering of the population problem, but American even doesn’t know what the problem is. How could these differences not stop the development of global university? （这段思想不错，但是对问题应该稍微具体一点展开分析。还有我不记得在哪里看过说最好不要出现什么CHINA之类表身份的词，你要写就写some Asian and African countries)

However, as if all nations are facing one same problem（人家又没说共同的问题只有一个）, they could also give different attitudes. Because these students come from different countries with different culture backgrounds and religions, they have different value and Weltanschauung. So build a global university could not essentially solve the social problems. About war, American will take the Muslim as a danger to their security due to the 9.11 Event, but some Arabian who religion the Muslim will see it as a saintly action.（这种敏感的尤其对美国不利的话题不要写，这可是美国人心中的痛啊，但这段思想挺好的）
Secondly, consider from school's aspect(the perspective of university), according to these students from different nations(that these students are from different nations), uniform educated form is difficult to practice. If we develop an university like this, should we need to have every languages' translators, experts, culture coordinates, religionists, or psychologists? This problem is quite realism, and not easily be solved. Furthermore, compare the cost that these actions needs with the results of the university may investigate to world's social problems, which one is more effective?

Moreover, solving such social problem need manage and support by the government, not only by education. Such social problems appear as result from the government's neglect, such as theft. One becomes a thief is owing to his poverty and hunger. If the government could solve the problems of poverty, and have some punishment to the thief, the theft problem would be solved at the same time. What education could do is just tell the social by morality, it could not prohibit the problem in practice. Only when the government and education work together may have effect on it.(这段放在这我不知道应该说完善好还是说偏题了好）
Admittedly, the obvious advantage of such kind of a global university, such as sharing information, exchanging experience, or mutual cooperation could not be ignored anyway. The nations all around the world could set up other relatively communication to talk about the problem and showing their own ideas together, such as terrorists are the most global problem these years. All nations government and other people could associate with each other to think how to forbidden them. （这段是不是应该先写）
In sum, it is not real to develop a global university to solve the world's most persistent social problems, the different culture background could not make every countries turn unanimous to a problems, the university is facing a series assumptions may not be solved, and the most important is that university students haven't such ability to change them, it needs government's manage and support. Even a global university is build up; it could not go a long way toward solving many different social problems.

我也是站在你这个角度写的，但是我的考虑没有你周到，你把global university的不现实和不好的地方说得很完整各个方面都分析到了，比比我还真是惭愧啊

但是你赞成好得那段是不是应该最先写呢，按逻辑顺序是应该在一定程度上肯定作者观点，之后再深入考虑进行批驳吧
你看看我得吧  https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

weiweizhuUID：179352

这样很浪费时间的啊
你可以现把每段的TS写下来
然后再一段一段填进去啊

irenemimiUID：2120985

恩,我也觉得9.11 不太能作为例子来说,但是我一时之间又想不出别的例子了......
我一般是先列提纲的呀,但是要想N久,包括例子什么的,
我平时喜欢先写很详细的提纲(用中文) 然后再开始写的, 巨浪费时间啊......