argument188 sally快来阿

yangxingUID：2112368

G06.Sally小组作文贴

ARGUMENT
188A new report suggests that men and women experience pain very differently from one another, and that doctors should consider these differences when prescribing pain medications. When researchers administered the same dosage of kappa opioids—a painkiller—to 28 men and 20 women who were having their wisdom teeth extracted, the women reported feeling much less pain than the men, and the easing of pain lasted considerably longer in women. This research suggests that kappa opioids should be prescribed for women whenever pain medication is required, whereas men should be given other kinds of pain medication. In addition, researchers should reevaluate the effects of all medications on men versus women.

1.        仅从28名男子和20名女子的报告就推断出应该为男女分开用麻醉药,样本数量太少.
2.        仅从拔牙止痛的一种病症,就推断出男女用麻醉药应该有区别,不能说明问题.
3.        就算这种止痛药有如此特点,也不能证明所有药物都有类似的情况,可能其他的止痛药让男性更加痛苦,药效更短.
4.        只根据这一个研究说明,就要对所有药品重新估计,作者太极端了.

The arguer conclude when doctors describe for men or women should have a critical thoughts and he think the effect of the medicine have much more difference between them. To support the assumption, he cites that there are 48 persons participates in an experiment and report women have less pain and long effects than men. From the weaken survey, we can point out several flaws easily, which is render it unconvincing.


To begin with, the arguer's assumption is based on the survey which only has 28 men and 20 women in the experiment. I think the arguer has the false analysis in the evidence. In common sense, we know if the survey is more convincing, it must has the random samples and the sample must be sufficient. From the argument, we know the survey only contains 48 persons. Whereas, we don't know whether the survey is random, but we know the samples of experiment are merely short. Or maybe women have more bear the pains than men or most of the 20 women are more tolerant than men. In addition, the amount between women and men are not balance. Perhaps much of the women don't like to complain the ache. And the arguer cites the reports of those persons as one of the evidence is unconvincing.


Furthermore, even if the quantity of samples are more convincing, nevertheless, merely from who were have the wisdom teeth extracted to reach the conclusion. From the disease we can't conclude other illnesses is the same either, moreover, the it is only a sickness for human being. Maybe it will be the opposite result when someone has an operation. Admittedly, although it maybe true in some case, in the illness it has some differences between male and female, we can’t reach the conclusion either. From the argument, we can't seem the sickness could instead other disease. So the witness is less convincing.


Thirdly, the arguer has the false extending ,when it is presume the effect of kappa opioids (KO) is more persuasive. Nevertheless, the dosage is represent the other homogeneous medicine. Perhaps the certain ones have the reverse effect on other persons, or maybe, men will have less pain and long affection than women when the doctor give them other type of dosage.. Without more experiments, I can't assure the effect of other homogeneous medicine is the same to it. And the evidence is unconvinced to us.


Finally, admittedly, even though the evidence of the above is convincing. Should we reevaluate the effects of all medicine? It is confused me that the experiment is the only exam about the effect of dosage and means the effects of other medicine are in vain. We must have more experiments to supports the extreme assumption.

In sum, the argument has more flaws unconvinced me that doctor should distinguish the description of men and women. In the argument, I can conclude the arguer not only cites the uncertain evidence, but have an extreme conclude. To strengthen the evidence the researcher should have much more convincing experiments.

490字,没限时.快拍拍.

[ Last edited by yangxing on 2005-12-7 at 12:10 ]

yangxingUID：2112368

要沉了,快ding

sallyxinduUID：2131253

Originally posted by yangxing at 2005-12-7 16:10
要沉了,快ding

yangxing好可爱拉;P不要怕沉，沉了我们会在小组帖里面看到你的帖子了，会有人来修改的，不用专门来看沉没了．呵呵，:lol

sallyxinduUID：2131253

ARGUMENT
188A new report suggests that men and women experience pain very differently from one another, and that doctors should consider these differences when prescribing pain medications. When researchers administered the same dosage of kappa opioids—a painkiller—to 28 men and 20 women who were having their wisdom teeth extracted, the women reported feeling much less pain than the men, and the easing of pain lasted considerably longer in women. This research suggests that kappa opioids should be prescribed for women whenever pain medication is required, whereas men should be given other kinds of pain medication. In addition, researchers should reevaluate the effects of all medications on men versus women.

1.        仅从28名男子和20名女子的报告就推断出应该为男女分开用麻醉药,样本数量太少.
2.        仅从拔牙止痛的一种病症,就推断出男女用麻醉药应该有区别,不能说明问题.
3.        就算这种止痛药有如此特点,也不能证明所有药物都有类似的情况,可能其他的止痛药让男性更加痛苦,药效更短.
4.        只根据这一个研究说明,就要对所有药品重新估计,作者太极端了.
提纲思路非常清楚
The arguer conclude又是时态，要不是concludes or concluded，再犯类似错误写检讨！觉得加个that好点 when doctors describe for men or women should have a critical thoughts and he think the effect of the medicine have much more difference between them. To support the assumption, he cites that there are 48 persons participates in an experiment and report women have less pain and long effects than men. From the weaken动词当形容词？？ survey, we can point out several flaws easily, which is render it unconvincing.原句语法有错误，表达也不是特别地道，建议改为which are redering unconvincing reasoning of arguer's argumentation
今天有事情，时间不够就不看下面了，coco会帮你改正完的，呵呵To begin with, the arguer's assumption is based on the survey which only has 28 men and 20 women in the experiment. I think the arguer has the false analysis in the evidence. In common sense, we know if the survey is more convincing, it must has the random samples and the sample must be sufficient. From the argument, we know the survey only contains 48 persons. Whereas, we don't know whether the survey is random, but we know the samples of experiment are merely short. Or maybe women have more bear the pains than men or most of the 20 women are more tolerant than men. In addition, the amount between women and men are not balance. Perhaps much of the women don't like to complain the ache. And the arguer cites the reports of those persons as one of the evidence is unconvincing.


Furthermore, even if the quantity of samples are more convincing, nevertheless, merely from who were have the wisdom teeth extracted to reach the conclusion. From the disease we can't conclude other illnesses is the same either, moreover, the it is only a sickness for human being. Maybe it will be the opposite result when someone has an operation. Admittedly, although it maybe true in some case, in the illness it has some differences between male and female, we can’t reach the conclusion either. From the argument, we can't seem the sickness could instead other disease. So the witness is less convincing.


Thirdly, the arguer has the false extending ,when it is presume the effect of kappa opioids (KO) is more persuasive. Nevertheless, the dosage is represent the other homogeneous medicine. Perhaps the certain ones have the reverse effect on other persons, or maybe, men will have less pain and long affection than women when the doctor give them other type of dosage.. Without more experiments, I can't assure the effect of other homogeneous medicine is the same to it. And the evidence is unconvinced to us.


Finally, admittedly, even though the evidence of the above is convincing. Should we reevaluate the effects of all medicine? It is confused me that the experiment is the only exam about the effect of dosage and means the effects of other medicine are in vain. We must have more experiments to supports the extreme assumption.

In sum, the argument has more flaws unconvinced me that doctor should distinguish the description of men and women. In the argument, I can conclude the arguer not only cites the uncertain evidence, but have an extreme conclude. To strengthen the evidence the researcher should have much more convincing experiments.

yangxingUID：2112368

谢谢组长，郁闷ing。

Archer1123UID：206148

还是传word档的吧，今天有事回来晚了，刚改好，下次会早点的
水平有限，有问题大家讨论吧，呵呵