issue70 calsunny的第四次作业(coffee小组)

calsunnyUID: 2163431

70. "In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."

态度：反对，过分夸大长期的坏处，而忽视了短期的不足。
提纲：1长期领导有它的优点
      2 频繁更换领导不利於稳定和持续发展；
      当然长期也有不足，但比起它的优点来是微不足道的。

The author asserts that the power should step down after five years , and to keep active, any enterprise needs the new leadership. It sounds reasonable but the author may be somewhat arbitrary. Actually the author emphases the role of new leadership, meanwhile, neglects some positive roles of keeping the leader longer and overlooks some detrimental effect of changing leaders frequency.

To begin with, the long term leader has many merits. On one hand, given the stability and development, the longer leader is prone to exert long-term programs which are necessary to any enterprise. No one wish an enterprise diminish for only three or five years. The longer leader knows about the enterprise more and acquaints with the employees better which make his decision more appropriate to the enterprise. As for the manager, experience acts as an important role, and a veteran leader who is more self-confident and will undoubtedly be more competent. From the view of the employee, they will keep loyal to the old leader. Comparing the new leader, it is easier to believe the person who are family with and repel the new one. The Microsoft leader Bill Gates, as a good example, he mastered the power of his enterprise he set up and today he is still the leader. But his business expands almost every inch land in most of the county. So does many other enterprises such as Dell. The long lasting leader is the decisive factor for the success of these enterprises.

Furthermore, the changing leader will be active and bring new air to an enterprise, while improper subrogation will result in serious aftermath and revitalization. New leadership is only a possibility for an enterprise to get success, not the surest way. The changing brings developmental opportunity but it means risk and fluctuation, as well. The people prefer the stability to the adventurous development. Rather, some enterprise need long-term invest and keep the policy long-lasting. The education, as an example, an enterprise which needs innovative theories and thinking but rejects the variability too often should have a long-term leader not a new one. Otherwise, the frequent changeable including the leadership will make the teacher and students even all the society confused and frustrated which must be a nightmare to anyone who are involved in. It indicates that the green-hand leader is not always the surest one.

Admittedly, the longer leader will generate many problems such as the corruption and the renewal of the knowledge, while relative policy will limit him. The ever-increasing advanced technology and advanced management methods will be the impetuous factor and make them go after the times.  Compared with the positive and insightful aspect, the negative is needless to say.

To sum up, the long leader does produce some disagreeable effects. But to get a comprehensive conclusion, it is necessary to notice that those step down after five years are not suitable. If the leader holds the power too short, it will undoubtedly damage the development of the enterprise.


还是以前写的，实在不太像样，立意非常浅！

[ Last edited by calsunny on 2005-12-31 at 16:57 ]

11yaoyaoUID: 177037

同学，要注意发帖子的格式哦

很显眼的在坛子里放着呢,麻烦看一下，把你的发贴格式改一改好吧

谢谢

calsunnyUID: 2163431

好，这就去看看，好像前面也这么发，没有出什么问题，所以就没注意！谢谢你！很喜欢看你的这个头像，每次都看上几眼！

hunsonUID: 2147580

70. "In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."

态度：反对，过分夸大长期的坏处，而忽视了短期的不足。
提纲：1长期领导有它的优点
      2 频繁更换领导不利於稳定和持续发展；
      当然长期也有不足，但比起它的优点来是微不足道的。

the syllabus's points is  mutually deployed.
The author asserts that the power should step down after five years , and to keep active, any enterprise needs the new leadership. It sounds reasonable but the author may be somewhat arbitrary. Actually the author emphases the role of new leadership, meanwhile, neglects some positive roles of keeping the leader longer and overlooks some detrimental effect of changing leaders frequency.

To begin with, the long term leader has many merits. On one hand, given the stability and development, the longer leader is prone to exert long-term programs which are necessary to any enterprise. No one wish an enterprise diminish for only three or five years. The longer leader knows about the enterprise more and acquaints with the employees better which make his decision more appropriate to the enterprise. As for the manager, experience acts as an important role, and a veteran leader who is more self-confident and will undoubtedly be more competent. From the view of the employee, they will keep loyal to the old leader. Comparing the new leader, it is easier to believe the person who are family with and repel the new one. The Microsoft leader Bill Gates, as a good example, he mastered the power of his enterprise he set up and today he is still the leader. But his business expands almost every inch land in most of the county. So does many other enterprises such as Dell. The long lasting leader is the decisive factor for the success of these enterprises.
[the author narrates from all level of the angle,such as leader, and employee. ]
Furthermore, the changing leader will be active and bring new air to an enterprise, while improper subrogation will result in serious aftermath and revitalization. New leadership is only a possibility for an enterprise to get success, not the surest way. The changing brings developmental opportunity but it means risk and fluctuation, as well. The people prefer the stability to the adventurous development. Rather, some enterprise need long-term invest and keep the policy long-lasting. The education, as an example, an enterprise which needs innovative theories and thinking but rejects the variability too often should have a long-term leader not a new one. [sorry ,i can't catch what you mean]Otherwise, the frequent changeable including the leadership will make the teacher and students even all the society confused and frustrated which[which?] must be a nightmare to anyone who are involved in. It indicates that the green-hand leader is not always the surest one.

Admittedly, the longer leader will generate many problems such as the corruption and the renewal of the knowledge, while relative policy will limit him. The ever-increasing advanced technology and advanced management methods will be the impetuous factor and make them go after the times.  Compared with the positive and insightful[insightful? i can't catch what you mean] aspect, the negative is needless to say.

To sum up, the long leader does produce some disagreeable effects. But to get a comprehensive conclusion, it is necessary to notice that those step down after five years are not suitable. If the leader holds the power too short, it will undoubtedly damage the development of the enterprise.
[Generally, structure is good enough to sustain the issue's skeleton.misnomers also should be curcumspected seriously.]

hunsonUID: 2147580

不好意思，没在状态，没改出什么东西来，明天再看看