issue17[AW狂人社]小组第一次作业

leonchunshengUID: 2247481

issue 17 "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a respondsibiliy to obey just laws and even more important, to disobey and resist the unjust laws."
Date:3—5   Words: 702    Time:2h
不知道全文的逻辑有没有问题，一些词汇可能有错误，大家帮看一下。
提纲：
1，        同意题目的部分观点；应当遵守公平的法律。
2，        对部分观点进行否定，法律并不能照顾到所有人的利益。如果每个人都因为自己的部分利益遭到损害而违抗法律，可能会是整个社会陷入混乱中。
3，        对不公正的法律人们应当采取合适的措施不能实施违法的行为。

The speaker asserts that laws could be devided into only two types of just and unjust ones and that the members of society should not only obey the just ones but more significant rebel the unjust ones. I agree insofar as it is crucial for each individual should regard  obeying the just laws as a reponsibility. However, the speaker's statement is indefensible. In my view, one should take the appropriate measures to addressing the problem which caused by the unjust laws, otherwise, the whole society will risk division and and fall into disaster.

True, the asserttion that it is significant for each individual to obey just laws is compelling. For two reasons, first, for a socity that wants to be civilized, it is necessary to enact laws so that make a guideline on behavior for citizens. Consider, for example, In the United States, the Ten Commandments, the Magma Carta, and the Constitution Of The United States Of America, these laws allow normal citizens to know the what types of actions should be punished and the penalties that could be ecpected for violating these laws. Second, laws that are legislated by the authourities besed on the interest of the general population is to make the society function smoothly, healthly and even efficiently, and to protect them from being deprived of the basic rights as human being. A aptly example of this involves in The Emacipation Proclaimation. When the Amrican society in the Civil War are in the situation that the black were diciminated and the conflict interests from different groups continuously enmerged, Lincoln enancted the laws to end the previous unfair social system. In short, laws enacted by authourities could make the general people not only  have a good knowledge that what they should behave but also have a better undersanding what rights they have in certain specific social systems.

Beyond the concession, nonetheless, i disgree with the speaker’s statement because it seems to recommand that the law only can be classified two tapes of just ones and unjust ones. Yet it might be not the case. The rapidly advancement in technology brings some kinds of crimes that so far have not had the relevant laws to restraint and punish such as crimes in the net. also in this kind of social backgroud the defination of "just and unjust laws" also is changing. As an illustration, excution regarded as the just laws in the past are deemed to be unjust in the repect of humanitarianism today in some places. Additionally, people who have different beliefs, values and culture and region bcackgrounds take the different even opersite view of the criterion of the justness and unjustness. However, one cannot rely on the interest of individual or a small specific community to judge the unjust of certain laws and then to disobey, even to resist,  them with being blind to the fact that the general people are being benifited from them. After all, to some extent, not every law can santisfy interests of all memers of society. Can you inmagine a sociey where various of intrersts are cofilicting due to only the individual opinion of the laws?

Furthermore, one should take the suitable attitudes and aprropriate and right approaches to face and address the unpleasant state, when the interest of the majority of social members is in danger, rather than adopt extrem ways. Consider, for examle, When the unfair social system and laws deprive the rights of African, they chose the Matin Lurthur King to be a leader to compromise with the government. On the contrary, in  Irac,  a series of explotion affairs made by some extremists , not only killed many innocent citizens but also made the whole society in the panic.

In summary, I concede that obeying the just laws is a significant resposibility for each individual. Nonetheless, the speaker's statement neglects the fact that not all laws can satisfy interests of people from different beliefs, values and backgrounds. In the final analysis, one should take appropriate measures to maintain his or her rights, at the same time the authourities also should open to receive the adivce from the general people to make unjust laws be just.and make the just ones be juster

fuyanjieUID: 2291879

:) 以普通读者身份,优点：例子丰富，都是西方社会的，所谓事实胜于雄辩；词汇丰富，有些我还记不起了。
                              如果加上一些分析好像更好。不知道是不是这样，不过是有这种感觉。

leonchunshengUID: 2247481

　谢谢你的评价,我会好好改正的.

小勺子的反思UID: 2280216

要深入的用红笔改哦 ,

自己改的多 ,就参与的多 ,就思考的多 , 换位思考 ,你现在就在ETS的角度 ,用他的角度评文章 ,自己也会进步 ,抓题目更明锐 ,知道以后自己要怎么避免错误 ,自己也更进步的