issue3Should we allocate more money for immediate problems?

thony-shenUID: 2516637

issue3 "It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations."

Should we allocate more money for immediate problems?

Should we allocate more money for immediate problems? The speaker asserts that. While I agree that immediate problems are important for it involves our well-being, it can’t conceived me that it is logical determination. Long-term research has many benefits, thus when we determine whether we should make more efforts to problems. Thus, we should cautious on it. I concede that this assertion has a great of direction values. After all, humilities will take serious attention on the problems which they confronting. People prefer the basic living ability rather than the long-terms. Accordingly, it is necessary to assign to a higher priority to immediate problems such the hunger, drug, violence when it comes to allocates public sources to social problems. However, there is doubt that the long-term issues should give in its fundamentality role on social develop. The assertion also has considerable merits on the basic the reason that solve immediate problems will let the current people's life more comfortable or at least more well-being. It is important to let her citizens feel happy for a state, but as human beings the big differential from animal is that we have thinking and can plan for future. I can’t image that if we only concern the current things, how the world will become, let alone make benefits to help future generations. So it's necessary to take long-term into consideration when it comes to government budget. On the other hand are two compelling arguments against that we should take the immediate more serious when allocate money than long-term research. First has to do methodology. The exact way to solves problems is that solve it when it begins to come out. We do long-term research is also a solution to solves immediate problems which will be aim mediate problems when we be old if we don't research it. The nature problems Such as the air pollution, water pollution, the Global Warming and so on. If we take any action such as research how to improve the efficiency of use petroleum or coal and other pollute fuel or how to control the pollution gas and crap influence human beings life when it appear, our world would be a more beautiful and our life would be more comfortable. At that time this research is long-term issues but become immediate issue now. Isn't it a good example to tell us recognizing the important of long-term issues also have much significance? Second has to do morality. All of us know that public source isn’t infinite some of them are share with future generations, for examples, the petroleum and other non-renewable source; we shouldn't dive into much money to explore these resources for the pretext that we face dressing problems of fuel crisis. We should take responsible for the wellbeing of our future generation, for the reason that human beings are the highest level creature in the living nature. If we do like that there is no differential between animals. To sum, this issue of how to allocate money between for immediate and long-term problems is complex topic, connecting to certain moral duty, social values and sensibility. Hence, it is sloppy to drawn easy or certain conclusion. Yet, when the immediate problems comes to the basic living abilities it is necessary to allocate more money for it, while on other issue we should be circumspect about the budget.

grekokomoUID: 2441677

加油～～！

grekokomoUID: 2441677

Should we allocate more money for immediate problems? The speaker asserts that. While I agree that immediate problems are important for it involves our well-being, it can’t conceived me that it is logical determination. Long-term research has many benefits, thus when we determine whether we should make more efforts to problems. Thus, we should cautious on it.（太汉语化了，we should pay more attention to it～） I concede that this assertion has a great of direction values. After all, humilities will take serious attention on the problems which they confronting. People prefer the basic living ability rather than the long-terms. Accordingly, it is necessary to assign to a higher priority to immediate problems such the hunger, drug, violence when it comes to allocates public sources to social problems. However, there is doubt that the long-term issues should give in its fundamentality role on social develop. The assertion also has considerable merits on the basic the reason that solve immediate problems will let the current people's life more comfortable or at least more well-being. It is important to let her citizens feel happy for a state, but as human beings the big differential from animal is that we have thinking and can plan for future. I can’t image that if we only concern the current things,（if we only concern the present～） how the world will become, let alone make benefits to help future generations. So it's necessary to take long-term into consideration when it comes to government budget. On the other hand are two compelling arguments against that we should take the immediate more serious when allocate money than long-term research. First has to do methodology. The exact way to solves（原形～！～） problems is that solve it when it begins to come out. We do（这个。。。不对，没有这种语法） long-term research is also a solution to solves immediate problems which will be aim mediate problems when we be old if we don't research it. The nature problems Such as the air pollution, water pollution, the Global Warming and so on. If we take any action such as research how to improve the efficiency of use petroleum or coal and other pollute fuel or how to control the pollution gas and crap influence human beings life when it appear, our world would be a more beautiful and our life would be more comfortable. At that time this research is long-term issues but become immediate issue now. Isn't it a good example to tell us recognizing the important of long-term issues also have much significance? Second has to do morality. All of us know that public source isn’t infinite some of them are share with future generations, for examples, the petroleum and other non-renewable source; we shouldn't dive into much money to explore these resources for the pretext that we face dressing problems of fuel crisis. We should take responsible for the wellbeing of our future generation, for the reason that human beings are the highest level creature in the living nature. If we do like that there is no differential between animals. To sum （up）or IN SUM, this issue of how to allocate money between for immediate and long-term problems is a complex topic, connecting to certain moral duty, social values and sensibility. Hence, it is sloppy to drawn easy or certain conclusion. Yet, when the immediate problems comes to the basic living abilities it is necessary to allocate more money for it, while on other issue we should be circumspect about the budget.

1.你的语法还有待提高

2.句式句型在写的时候要斟酌，不能想到什么写什么

3.仓促的看了一遍，希望建议对你有所帮助～