|
The lecturer point out that the private space tourism is not benefit to scientist and public as the passage said. He cast doubt on what the passage indicates. Firstly, the reading passage believes that due to there are more competitions,
privatization of space travel cost lower. It will benefit to make a cheaper space exploration and the space tourists also enjoy this merits. However, the professor asserts that in fact, privatization of space travel is an expensive system because we should test and retest its safety or control this system. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates. Secondly, the writer claims that private space tourism will promote the scientific discoveries much more and quicker than in the past. on the other hand, the professor maintains that if privatization of space travel is occur, it is just a commercial activities which is lace of scientific and maybe delay the development of scientific exploration. This is another part the lecturer denies. Finally, the reading passage states that the taxpayers of private space travel will enjoy an eased financial burden due to their income of customers. The professor refutes this point by saying that to explore the private space tourism, it will take billions of dollars to build the space stations and space airport, in that way, the taxpayer will pay more for it. So the lecture totally disagree with the view made in the passage. |