issue40 永不言弃小组第四次作业by 6号

hidewildUID: 2362646

40. The media-and society in general-mistakenly expect an individual to speak for a particular group, whether or not that individual truly represents the views of the entire group.


It is quite insightful that a common mistake with the assumption that an individual are supposed to speak for a particular group can be committed by the media. Noting the fact that differences and disagrees may exist between the group and some of its members; we can easily give up the dream which has to deny the individuals to pursue their own interest. Thus we know that some reports released by the mass media which are still stick to this dream are either misleading or intended to be true.

 

Specifically, people have different personalities and positions which can influence their presentation in front of a video camera. When asked a complicated question, the reactions will be quite different depending on the characteristics. For example, by analyzing data from satellites, a group of scientists have recently made an excellent progress which can explain the original of a structure predicted by some theory. This discovery is a big shock and many journalists hurry to interview members of the group. When asked the importance of the found, a member, who is famous for being humble, may appear not so confident, acclaiming that this discovery need discussing by other scientists in order to attain its position. On the contrary, a progressing member will speak high of this discovery, considering it as a historical event. As we see, both of them speak for the same group, yet their words do not seem to agree with each other .Therefore we can not access to truth regardless of personalities of different members. Accordingly expecting an individual to expose the group's view is quite difficult in reality.

 

What is more, possibly benefit controversy existing between an individual and the group makes it even impossible for one to represents the view of a particular group. Let us imagine that a journalist is interviewing some people in a company and the topic is comments on your company's new housing-policy. And we can team them into three groups: policy-maker, benefit-upers and the rest. Leaders in the first group are sure to be confident with their new plan and they may assert that this policy will improve the housing condition of all stuffs as a whole. Of course, the third group believe this new arrangement is fundamentally well-designed considering that some colleague's situation remain the same or even reduced. Undoubtedly, the rest whose situations are not improved will just be passive or objected. In brief words, appraises of members in a group towards the same item can be dramatically different so that we can not expect an individual to become a credible speaker for a group.

 

Although an individual's opinion can be unreliable to represent the group, we can not leap to the conclusion that information released by media is not worthy at all. At least we are informed with some facts besides the ideas and commands. And in some cases an individual can speak for a particular group if the group has discussed to decide the content. A diplomatic speech is often important and influential because it is hardly affected by the speaker's personal factor. 

 

Generally speaking, considering the fact that an individual can not speak for a particular group in most cases, the media and society should not expect one to give us accurate and entire information of the group.

MYcoltingUID: 2563080

恩 弄错了吧 你那不是网络通用顺序

MYcoltingUID: 2563080

  
It is quite insightful that a common mistake with the assumption that an individual is supposed to speak for a particular group can be committed by the media. Noting the fact that differences and disagrees may exist between the group and some of its members; we can easily give up the dream which has to deny the individuals to pursue their own interest. Thus we know that some reports released by the mass media which are still sticking to this dream are either misleading or intended to be true.



Specifically, people have different personalities and positions which can influence their presentation in front of a video camera. When asked a complicated question, the reactions will be quite different depending on the characteristics. For example, by analyzing data from satellites, a group of scientists have recently made an excellent progress which can explain the original of a structure predicted by some theory. This discovery is a big shock and many journalists hurried to interview members of the group. When asked the importance of the found, a member, who is famous for being humble, may appear not so confident, acclaiming that this discovery need discussing by other scientists in order to attain its position. On the contrary, a progressing member will speak high of this discovery, considering it as a historical event. As we see, both用both就可以了 speak for the same group, yet their words do not seem to agree with each other .Therefore,一般都是加个逗号 we can not access to truth regardless of personalities of different members. Accordingly expecting an individual to expose the group's view is quite difficult, in reality.



What is more, possibly benefit controversy existing between an individual and the group makes it even impossible for one to represent the view of a particular group. Let us imagine that a journalist is interviewing some people in a company and the topic is comments on your company's new housing-policy. Furthermore,个人感觉改成furthermore好些 毕竟比and高级 we can team them into three groups: policy-maker, benefit-upers and the rest. Leaders in the first group are sure to be confident with their new plan, and they may assert that this policy will improve the housing condition of all stuffs as a whole. Of course, the third group believes this new arrangement is fundamentally well-designed considering that some colleague's situation remains the same or even reduced. Undoubtedly, the rest whose situations are not improved will just be passive or objected. In brief words, appraises of members in a group towards the same item can be dramatically different so that we cannot expect an individual to become a credible speaker for a group.



Although an individual's opinion can be unreliable to represent the group, we cannot leap to the conclusion that information released by media is not worthy at all. At least we are informed with some facts besides the ideas and commands. Furthermore, in some cases an individual can speak for a particular group if the group has discussed to decide the content. A diplomatic speech is often important and influential because it is hardly affected by the speaker's personal factor. 内容少了点，我个人觉得中间三段应该均匀着墨



Generally speaking, considering the fact that an individual can not speak for a particular group in most cases, the media and society should not expect one to give us accurate and entire information of the group. 结尾太仓促了 应该从另一个角度总结下 然后再展望（寄托版主给俺的意见，说归说，我还真展望不好）