寄托天下
查看: 1106|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

〓DIES IN FLAMS〓 Issue119by cjlu [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
430
寄托币
4498
注册时间
2008-1-16
精华
5
帖子
71

荣誉版主 AW小组活动奖 IBT Smart Scorpio天蝎座 GRE守护之星

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-4-6 22:26:27 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 cjlu 于 2009-4-10 01:10 编辑

    When we set research priorities for science, education, or any other area, what’s the rules that we ought to obey? For the researcher, what should they consider before they launch their exploration? It’s no doubt that how many people will benefit from the research is a major orientation. In another direction, equally, its frontier nature is a factor which can’t be overlooked.
    Human beings always carry on researches with the aim of getting a better future. Just as we know, only when the majority of people get a better life, the society’s level is said to have been improved. And for the masses, life’s improvement means to be more convenient and at ease. +例子、纳税人
    However, just do some researches to satisfy the public’s needs are far from enough. Standing in the position of a nation, the decision-maker must consider how to protect the country and its folks, how to develop the country’s strength. For this, it’s their duty to prosecute the studies of military, though obviously its straightforward influence will not involve the public. A piece of news ever said that our country invested hundreds million to improve the quality of the spacesuits. What the clothes should be to let the astronaut move around in the outer space without receive the damaged radiation? It has been a vital research program for many countries which have the ambition and potential to quest the further mystery. How could we calculate the specific gravity of the huge sum of money we put into the program with the repayment to the ordinary people’ lives? The answer is lucid but we all know it’s deserved. For it may not contribute to our own life, it will improve our posterity’s living.
    And saying in another level, some researchers are belongs to the kind which may not apply in contemporary era but in a further time. One can rarely live without computer now. Studying, playing, working, we have to admit that it’s hard for us to get away from the little “notebook”. But a few decades ago, computer is just a heavy “box” which you can only do some straightforward calculation. And the user of it is not the public but the army. The primary purpose to invent computer is not for the public but the undercover military activities. At that time no one can forecast that with the development of the technology and update of the idea, computers walked out from the home of the peerage and then become an indispensable member of the boisterous world. It’s not a “baby” for the major, but it actually became. If we deny it when it first comes to the world because of the reason that it’s not useful for the masses, how could we get today’s achievement?
    To take the priorities of researches into consideration, one may think over the universality and frontier simultaneously. Without universality, the majority of the society may query the effectiveness of the research. Without frontierour life may miss some beautiful possibility when it goes on. Thus, while we consider the people’s amount who benefit from the research, it’s irrational to ignore the influence that a research can bring to our distant further life.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
60
寄托币
2220
注册时间
2009-2-3
精华
1
帖子
128

AW小组活动奖

沙发
发表于 2009-4-8 14:11:34 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 archaeology 于 2009-4-8 22:11 编辑

When we set research priorities for science, education, or any other area, what’s the rules that we ought to obey? For the researcher(复数,你后面用的是they), what should they consider before they launch their exploration? It’s no doubt that how many people will benefit from the research is a major orientation. In another direction, equally, its frontier nature is a factor which can’t be overlooked.
Human beings always carry on researches with the aim of getting a better future. Just as we know, only when the majority of people get a better life, the society’s level is said to have been improved. And for the masses, life’s improvement means to be more convenient and at ease.  
However, just do some researches to satisfy the public’s needs are far from enough. Standing in the position of a nation, the decision-maker must consider how to protect the country and its folks, how to develop the country’s strength. For this, it’s their duty to prosecute the studies of military, though obviously its straightforward influence will not involve the public. A piece of news ever said that our country invested hundreds million to improve the quality of the spacesuits. (航天服这个例子不错)What the clothes should be to let the astronaut move around in the outer space without receive the damaged radiation? It has been a vital research program for many countries which have the ambition and potential to quest the further mystery. How could we calculate the specific gravity of the huge sum of money we put into the program with the repayment to the ordinary people’ lives? The answer is lucid but we all know it’s deserved. For it may not contribute to our own life, it will improve our posterity’s living.
And saying in another level, some researchers are belongs to(用法错了吧?) the kind which may not apply in contemporary era but in a further time. One can rarely live without computer now. Studying, playing, working, we have to admit that it’s hard for us to get away from the little “notebook”. But a few decades ago, computer is just a heavy “box” which you can only do some straightforward calculation. And the user of it is not the public but the army. The primary purpose to invent computer is not for the public but the undercover military activities. At that time no one can forecast that with the development of the technology and update of the idea, computers walked out from the home of the peerage and then become an indispensable member of the boisterous world. It’s not a “baby” for the major, but it actually became. If we deny it when it first comes to the world because of the reason that it’s not useful for the masses, how could we get today’s achievement?
To take the priorities of researches into consideration, one may think over the universality and frontier simultaneously. Without universality, the majority of the society may query the effectiveness of the research. Without frontier,our life may miss some beautiful possibility when it goes on. Thus, while we consider the people’s amount who benefit from the research, it’s irrational to ignore the influence that a research can bring to our distant further life.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
60
寄托币
2220
注册时间
2009-2-3
精华
1
帖子
128

AW小组活动奖

板凳
发表于 2009-4-8 14:21:43 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 archaeology 于 2009-4-8 22:17 编辑

cjlu,我觉得这篇作文逻辑比较清晰,主要是论证不能忽视某些研究对于我们未来的作用,两个例子都不错。语法基本没有什么问题。总的来说,我觉得写得不错。
ps:我是作文新手,水平还不到家,从我的角度看你的作文挺好的,目前还提不出什么更有建设性的意见了,不好意思。
dies in flames 一起努力啊!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
16
寄托币
1465
注册时间
2008-8-28
精华
0
帖子
16

GRE梦想之帆 AW小组活动奖

地板
发表于 2009-4-9 15:03:01 |只看该作者
When we set research priorities for science, education, or any other area, what’s the rules that we ought to obey? For the researcher, what should they consider before they launch their exploration? It’s no doubt that how many people will benefit from the research is a major orientation. In another direction, equally, its frontier nature is a factor which can’t be overlooked.
(从这起是单独一段吗?请下次把行空出来,我刚刚误会了)Human beings always carry on researches with the aim of getting a better future. Just as we know, only when the majority of people get a better life, the society’s level is said to have been improved. And for the masses, life’s improvement means to be more convenient and at ease. +例子、纳税人
However, just do some researches to satisfy the public’s needs are far from enough. Standing in the position of a nation, the decision-maker must consider how to protect the country and its folks, how to develop the country’s strength. For this, it’s their duty to prosecute the studies of military, though obviously its straightforward influence will not involve the public. A piece of news ever said that our country invested hundreds million to improve the quality of the spacesuits. What the clothes should be to let the astronaut move around in the outer space without receive the damaged radiation? It has been a vital research program for many countries which have the ambition and potential to quest the further mystery. How could we calculate the specific gravity of the huge sum of money we put into the program with the repayment to the ordinary people’ lives? The answer is lucid but we all know it’s deserved. For(删,或用because, for表原因不可以放句首) it may not contribute to our own life, (but)it will improve our posterity’s living.


And saying in another level, some researchers(researches) are belongs to(belong to) the kind which may not (be applied)apply in contemporary era but in a further time. (缺少过渡)One can rarely live without computer now. Studying, playing, working, we have to admit that it’s hard for us to get away from the little “notebook”. But a few decades ago, computer is just a heavy “box” which you can only do some straightforward calculation. And the user of it is not the public but the army. The primary purpose to invent computer is not for the public but the undercover military activities. At that time no one can forecast that with the development of the technology and update of the idea, computers walked out from the home of the peerage and then become an indispensable member of the boisterous world. It’s not a “baby” for the major, but it actually became. If we deny it when it first comes to the world because of the reason that it’s not useful for the masses, how could we get today’s achievement?
既然你要论证具有前瞻性的眼光也很重要,你虽然给出了电脑的例子,但我觉得缺少前人(你可以说是少部分人或者研究者)对它的前瞻性的看法,(大部分人是不看好它的研究),否则怎么说明当初决定研究电脑室是具有远见的呢(这个不是根据后来的结果看,而是在开发的时候研究者就具备了这样的眼光)?觉得加上这一点会更深刻。To take the priorities of researches into consideration, one may think over the universality and frontier simultaneously. Without universality, the majority of the society may query the effectiveness of the research. Without frontier,our life may miss some beautiful possibility when it goes on. Thus, while we consider the people’s amount who benefit from the research, it’s irrational to ignore the influence that a research can bring to our distant further life.

其实你思路和我很像,都论证了最重要的问题应不限于提高大多数人们的生活质量。但是你的主题是,提高大多数人的生活同时,具有前瞻性的眼光也很重要。觉得Without frontier,our life may miss some beautiful possibility when it goes on.这个思想很赞~电脑的例子也很不错~

你的词也用得很好,比较丰富~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
59
寄托币
1948
注册时间
2009-3-15
精华
1
帖子
24
5
发表于 2009-4-28 01:06:42 |只看该作者
红色:建议修改的地方
蓝色:不错的

紫色:个人建议
  

When we set research priorities for science, education, or any other area, what’s the rules(which standard should be taken?) that we ought to obey?For the researcher, what should they consider before they launch their exploration? It’s no doubt(这个词的意思是很可能) that how many people will benefit from the research is a major orientation. In another direction, equally, its frontier nature is a factor which can’t be overlooked.

Human beings always carry on researches with the aim of getting a better future. Just as we know, only when the majority of people get a better life, the society’s level is said to have been improved.(这句话貌似有点多余) And for the masses, life’s improvement means to be more convenient and at ease. +例子、纳税人

However, just do some researches to satisfy the public’s needs are far from enough.(这个作为TS有点牵强) Standing in the position of a nation, the decision-maker must consider how to protect the country and its folks, how to develop the country’s strength. For this, it’s their duty to prosecute the studies of military, though obviously its straightforward influence will not involve the public. A piece of news ever said that our country invested hundreds million to improve the quality of the spacesuits. What the clothes should be to let the astronaut move around in the outer space without receive the damaged radiation? It has been a vital research program for many countries which have the ambition and potential to quest the further mystery. How could we calculate the specific gravity of the huge sum of money we put into the program with the repayment to the ordinary people’ lives? The answer is lucid but we all know it’s deserved. For it may not contribute to our own life, it will improve our posterity’s living. (这一段有点例子堆砌的嫌疑哦)

    And saying in another level, some researchers are belongs to the kind which may not apply in contemporary era but in a further time. One can rarely live without computer now. Studying, playing, working, we have to admit that it’s hard for us to get away from the little “notebook”. But a few decades ago, computer is just a heavy “box” which you can only do some straightforward calculation. And the user of it is not the public but the army. The primary purpose to invent computer is not for the public but the undercover military activities. At that time no one can forecast that with the development of the technology and update of the idea, computers walked out from the home of the peerage and then become an indispensable member of the boisterous world. It’s not a “baby” for the major, but it actually became. If we deny it when it first comes to the world because of the reason that it’s not useful for the masses, how could we get today’s achievement?(这一段develop还是不错的,有效支持了你的本段主题句)

    To take the priorities of researches into consideration, one may think over the universality and frontier simultaneously. Without universality, the majority of the society may query the effectiveness of the research. Without frontierour life may miss some beautiful possibility when it goes on. Thus, while we consider the people’s amount who benefit from the research, it’s irrational to ignore the influence that a research can bring to our distant further life. (最后结尾貌似没有明确提出自己的观点,而是一直在说什么什么不对)

格式:文章每段定格写,段落间空一行
语言还算比较流畅。
建议多读一些文章,研究范文是怎么写的。
加油!


心如磁针石,誓死指南方

使用道具 举报

RE: 〓DIES IN FLAMS〓 Issue119by cjlu [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
〓DIES IN FLAMS〓 Issue119by cjlu
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-938809-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部