0910G[North America Flying] Issue157 by Rainyashley

rainyashleyUID: 2538965

The author claims that all the observations are subjective which are colored by one's own expectations and desires. It comes to a conclusion that we cannot trust any truth at all because they're based on the observer's taste.Actually, the author confused the observation with interpretation and the perspective of the problem. The observer may choose the perspective they like or describe their conclusion by their own mean. This doesn't equal that their process of observation is not objective.

We come out a right conclusion because of the objective observation and objective interpretation. Copernicus's theory that it is Sun, not Earth, at the center of the universe is based on an objective observation and accurate calculation. It overthrow the theory, which is accoladed by the prevailing religious notion. If we consider that this observation is  subjective, which is not exist and worth believing, it runs against the achievements which attribute to the advancement of scientific discovery in almost 500 years. Maybe the author provide the evidence about Einstein's theory of relativity to prove his idea. Actually, there is no contradictions between Newton's theory of classical mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity. their discoveries contribute to different research perspective and different objective. We can not rule out Newton's theory because of the appearance of Einstein' theory. It is approved by everyone that Newton' theory, which relies on objective observation and interpretation, is a breakthrough in physical science. As for the theory of relativity,
which has been proven absolutely correct, it is Einstein that break the subjective perspective hold by ordinary people about time and space which misguide people for quite a long time.

Sometimes, we find that some "objective" observation are not pure objective,which may disturb our judgements. In fact they are not objective observation, they are just that we cannot accept the consequence or a suspicious of ourselves after objective observation.On the other words, they are subjective judgement according to our desire and expectation not to the objective observation because we blindly believe and adore authority. In a trial or in a lesson, we mainly accept what the teacher said and the book wrote, because they experience the examination of time and they are truth. So even though we find some grounds in suspicious after objective observation, we may think these suspicions are not attribute to defects of the theory but the flaws of ourselves. So,we conclude that the theory is absolutely right. Obviously, the problem is not that we don't observe objectively but that we cannot interpret the conclusion objectively.

In addition, things are not static forever, they change every minute, but they keep relative static in a period of time. So, it is surely that some theories will out-of-date without catching the step on times. Moreover, scientific conclusion must experience the procedure for establishing, suspecting, overthrowing, and establishing a new. It is the regularity of everything. We cannot assert that those theories which was took the place of  by other are not worth believing because they observed and concluded subjectively.

In sum, the process of observation is objective, the reason why there are still some subjective conclusion is that we interpret the consequence of the observation subjectively and usually,we cannot trust the authority instead of our objective observation, which cause the conclusion guided by our desires and expectation.

DidoyUID: 2181213

The author claims that all the observations are subjective which are colored by one's own expectations and desires. It comes to a conclusion that we cannot trust any truth at all because they're based on the observer's taste.Actually, the author confused the observation with interpretation and the perspective of the problem. The observer may choose the perspective they like or describe their conclusion by their own mean. However，this doesn't equal that their process of observation is not objective. Actually, we come out a right conclusion because of the objective observation and objective interpretation. For example, Copernicus's theory that it is Sun, not Earth, at the center of the universe is based on an objective observation and accurate calculation, and it overthrow the theory, which is accoladed by the prevailing religious notion. If we consider that this observation is  subjective, which is not (exist and) worth believing, it runs against the achievements which attribute to the advancement of scientific discovery in almost 500 years. Maybe the author provide the evidence about Einstein's theory of relativity to prove his idea. Actually, there is no contradictions between Newton's theory of classical mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity. their discoveries contribute to different research perspective and different objective. We can not rule out Newton's theory because of the appearance of Einstein' theory. It is approved by everyone that Newton' theory, which relies on objective observation and interpretation, is a breakthrough in physical science. As for the theory of relativity, which has been proven absolutely correct, it is Einstein that break the subjective perspective hold by ordinary people about time and space which misguide people for quite a long time. (Personal opinion: I feel like you are really enthusiastic about this topic between Einstein and Newton; however, I think it may not be good to include something still in heated debate as your evidence. 'Cause if it is still conventious and arguable, it might not be strong enough.) Sometimes, we find that some "objective" observation are not pure objective,which may disturb our judgements. In fact they are not objective observation, but they are just that we cannot accept the consequence or a suspicious of ourselves after objective observation.On the other words, they are subjective judgement according to our desire and expectation not to the objective observation because we blindly believe and adore authority. In a trial or in a lesson, we mainly accept what the teacher said and the book wrote, because they experience the examination of time and we take it as they are truth. So even though we find some grounds in suspicious after objective observation, we may think these suspicions are not attribute to defects of the theory but the flaws of ourselves. Thus,we conclude that the theory is absolutely right. Obviously, the problem is not that we don't observe objectively but that we cannot interpret the conclusion objectively. (Hit the right gut!:) In addition, things are not static forever, they change every minute, but they keep relative static in a period of time. So, it is surely that some theories will out-of-date without catching the step on times. Moreover, scientific conclusion must experience the procedure for establishing, suspecting, overthrowing, and establishing a new, which means that....... It is the regularity of everything. We cannot assert that those theories which was took the place of  by other are not worth believing because they observed and concluded subjectively. In sum, the process of observation is objective, the reason why there are still some subjective conclusion is that we interpret the consequence of the observation subjectively and usually,we trust the authority rather than our objective observation, which causes the conclusion guided by our desires and expectation.

这。。。怎么觉得这篇文章就是专门写给我看的。。。ORZ 我也是觉得题目是混淆了observation和interpretation，但是感觉上同意其观点会比较难写，所以就选择了反对，反正题目混淆了，我也混淆一下，就把observation理解成为interpretation来写好了。。。我错了，应该向你学习的，你太强了！我敬佩！！！我瞻仰！！！
我鸡蛋里挑骨头了一些，您凑合着看。唯一的建议就是。。。连接词多用用，有助于批文者找到他们要找的东西。：）

casunlightUID: 2239395

The author claims that all theobservations are subjective which are colored by one's own expectationsand desires. It comes to a conclusion that we cannot trust any truth atall because they're based on the observer's taste.Actually, the authorconfused the observation with interpretation and the perspective of theproblem. The observer may choose the perspective they like or describetheir conclusion by their own mean. This doesn't equal that theirprocess of observation is not objective.

We come out a right conclusion 前后不通的感觉becauseof the objective observation and objective interpretation. Copernicus'stheory that it is Sun, not Earth, at the center of the universe isbased on an objective observation and accurate calculation. Itoverthrow the theory, which is accoladed by the prevailing religiousnotion. If we consider that this observation is  subjective, which isnot exist and worth believing, it runs against the achievements whichattribute to the advancement of scientific discovery in almost 500years. Maybe the author provide the evidence about Einstein's theory ofrelativity to prove his idea. Actually, there is no contradictionsbetween Newton's theory of classical mechanicsand Einstein's theory of relativity. their discoveries contribute todifferent research perspective and different objective. We can not ruleout Newton's theory because of the appearance of Einstein' theory. Itis approved by everyone that Newton' theory, which relies on objectiveobservation and interpretation, is a breakthrough in physical science.As for the theory of relativity,
which has been proven absolutelycorrect, it is Einstein that break the subjective perspective hold byordinary people about time and space which misguide people for quite along time.

Sometimes, we find that some"objective" observation are not pure objective,which may disturb ourjudgements没有s. In fact they are not objective observation, they are justthat we cannot accept the consequence or a suspicious of ourselves不确定这个表达是否正确after objective observation.On the other words, they are subjectivejudgement according to our desire and expectation not to the objectiveobservation because we blindly believe and adore authority. In a trialor in a lesson, we mainly accept what the teacher said and the bookwrote, because they experience the examination of time and they aretruth. So even though we find some grounds in suspicious afterobjective observation, we may think these suspicions are not attributeto defects of the theory but the flaws of ourselves. So,we concludethat the theory is absolutely right. Obviously, the problem is not thatwe don't observe objectively but that we cannot interpret theconclusion objectively.

In addition, things are not staticforever, they change every minute, but they keep relative static in aperiod of time. So, it is surely that some theories will out-of-datewithout catching the step on times. Moreover, scientific conclusionmust experience the procedure for establishing, suspecting,overthrowing, and establishing a new. It is the regularity ofeverything. We cannot assert that those theories which was took theplace of  by other are not worth believing because they observed andconcluded subjectively.

In sum, the process of observation isobjective, the reason why there are still some subjective conclusion isthat we interpret the consequence of the observation subjectively andusually,we cannot trust the authority instead of our objectiveobservation, which cause the conclusion guided by our desires andexpectation.

逻辑我不太明白,感觉你是大刀大枪的上去一较高低,也许表达上可以soft一些.