追星剑特训第一期：Issue 17 by 飘飘zly

飘飘zlyUID: 2200552

Issue 17
“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws”
提纲：
公民遵守公正的法律是毫无质疑的。是否反对和抵制不公平的法律取决于我们对不公平法律的定义。
1.
我们应该遵守公正的法律，使得社会更加稳定。（公正的法律给我们的生活带来的好处。）
2.
如果不公正的法律被定义为限制或剥夺了某些人应该享有的权益的话，我认为是可以反抗和抵制的。（黑人运动，妇女运动，）
3.
正确对待反抗不公正的法律，可以使我们修正法律使它变得合理，可以保障我们的社会稳定，安定。

Law, just and unjust, is a tool to govern a society. People have common sense that he or she, in a society, must obey just laws. While it is not a clear definition or standard of unjust laws, it oversimplifies to resist obeying it.

Just laws, as rational rules and sound regulations, should be obeyed in order to make a safe and stable society. Just laws were examined by long human history, and were verified to be useful of modern society. Just laws against monopoly, for example, to make good economic competitions in societies; just laws resist criminal conduct to safeguard person’s property and security; just laws inhibit race discriminations to guarantee people freedom and equity. Just laws, as coercive power of societies, should also improve individual’s life of education, health, welfare. On the contrary, if it is not just laws to constrain his or her conduct and to assess morality standard, it makes a society dangerous and disordered and cannot safeguard people’s lives. In this event, people have duty to conform just laws.

On the other hand, focusing on unjust laws, it contributes to ‘unjust laws’ definition. Whether citizens have responsibilities to resist unjust law depends on a common definition and evaluation standard of just law and unjust law in a society. If unjust law, that is, is considered as parts individuals’ responsible rights and necessary interests which is confined and deprived by governor or society. People, under this circumstance, should resist obeying unjust laws or disobey without violence. For instance, after the Civil War in history, the back were subjected to race discriminations in ways that he or she could not have meals in a restaurant with the white. In order to resist unjust law and protect his or her right, the back people have a rest in a restaurant without food. They ultimately have the same right as the write, and recently live a harmony life in state. With such definition of unjust law, individuals subjected unfairness and not freedom should disobey unjust law, striving to get his or her necessary right. It benefits as a society to make a stable and harmonious environment.

By monitoring person’s conduct and governing society, unjust laws can be remedied to just ones by disobedience. As is known, an aim of law is to make a peaceful, orderly, safe, stable society. It is undoubted that just law serves to make better society, whereas relative unjust laws have remained short-lived in the long run. The ways in that individuals suffered inequality reject to obey unjust laws also help us to issue just and sound laws over an evolution of human history. Unjust laws are remedied by legislation and judicial constitution through long enduring social problems, ruling out unjust factors of laws. A sound legislative system in recent society has a long history to examine whether it should guarantee every person’s right.

In a conclusion, it is obvious that people have responsibilities to obey just laws. While disobeying unjust laws reflects a social problem that some individuals’ rights are undermined. It pays attention to remedy a more sound law in order to keep a society stable and develop all the time.

bloodbobUID: 2627007

Law, just and unjust, is a tool to govern a society. People have common sense that he or she, in a society, must obey just laws. While it is not a (there exist no…) clear definition or standard of unjust laws, it oversimplifies to resist obeying it. (oversimplify是vt.)
简明的提出对just/unjust law的态度，很好.

Just laws, as rational rules and sound regulations, should be obeyed in order to make a safe and stable society. Just laws were examined by long human history, and were verified to be useful of (in) modern society. Just laws against monopoly, for example, to make good economic competitions in societies; just laws resist (against) criminal conduct to safeguard person’s property and security; just laws inhibit race discriminations to guarantee people freedom and equity. Just laws, as coercive power of societies, should also improve individual’s life of education, health, welfare. On the contrary, if it is not just laws (there are no just laws available in the society) to constrain his or her conduct and to assess morality standard, it makes a society (The society will turn out to be) dangerous and disordered and cannot safeguard people’s lives. In this event, people have duty to conform just laws.


On the other hand, focusing on unjust laws, it contributes to ‘unjust laws’ definition. (好像不成句) Whether citizens have responsibilities to resist unjust law depends on a common definition and evaluation standard of just law and unjust law in a society. If unjust law, that is, is considered as parts individuals’ responsible rights and necessary interests which is confined and deprived by governor or society. (, 半句话，不如前后合并成一句)People, under this circumstance, should resist obeying unjust laws or disobey without violence. For instance, after the Civil War in history, the back were subjected to race discriminations in ways that he or she could not have meals in a restaurant with the white. In order to resist unjust law and protect his or her right, the back people (the black) have a rest in a restaurant without food (flow to sit at the table with no meals ordered). They ultimately have the same right as the write, and recently live a harmony life in state. With such definition of unjust law, individuals subjected (suffering from) unfairness and not freedom (undue constraints) should disobey unjust law, striving to get his or her necessary right. It benefits as a society to make a stable and harmonious environment.

By monitoring person’s conduct and governing society, unjust laws can be remedied to just ones by disobedience. As is known, an aim of law is to make a peaceful, orderly, safe, stable society. It is undoubted that just law serves to make better society, whereas relative unjust laws have remained short-lived in the long run. The ways in (The fact) that individuals suffered inequality reject to obey unjust laws also help (urge) us to issue just and sound laws over an evolution of human history. Unjust laws are remedied by legislation and judicial constitution through long enduring social problems, ruling out unjust factors of laws. (没看懂…) A sound legislative system in recent society has a long history to examine whether it should guarantee every person’s right.

In a conclusion, it is obvious that people have responsibilities to obey just laws. While disobeying unjust laws reflects a social problem that some individuals’ rights are undermined. (半句) It pays attention (It worth our attention) to remedy a more sound law in order to keep a society stable and develop all the time.  

出色的逻辑，有少许句型错误，没看懂，再改下吧。