NAF 的作业issue50

wangnan318comUID: 2664743

TOPIC: ISSUE50 - "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."
WORDS: 511
TIME: 01:00:00
DATE: 2009/6/4 18:51:31

The speaker alleges that professions in college should be required to work outside the academic world for improving the quality of education. To some extent, I find this claim is specious because it neglect the characteristics of some subjects which aims are not pragmatism. On the contrary, I agree with this assertion insofar as professors get a better understanding about differences between the academy and the requirement of work. What's more, a job related experiences can also update professors' obsolete knowledge and which, on the other hand, surely prove the quality of education.


Firstly, jobs, to professors, can decrease the gap between academy and work. Currently, companies always require their applicants have some relevant experiences in certain area. Why? Because the knowledge we have learned in class may quit far away from reality and the study in college mainly stays on the academic level which, more or less, may quarantine the study from the reality. Therefore, if professors in college could have a experience in professions relevant job, they will know how to teach at a practical level and impartial the latest technology to their students, and, of course, our students will benefit a lot from it due to professors' experience.

Secondly, since today's world is rapid developing, professors' knowledge may be out of date. However, jobs always require the optimal solutions which ask for the latest and advanced technologies to improve the current conditions. Hence, if they get a chance to work in his profession relevant area, professors have update their knowledge to meet the job's requirements, and students will get a reliable and effective path to run after the latest trends in their professions relevant area at work. Besides, students equipped with job relevant knowledge also cater to the companies' tastes.

The speaker, however, dismiss some subjects purely intend on academic level such as math, physics or arts. In these areas, professions need not have a job experiences because these professions are always propelled by experiments and theoretic research, and show little relevance to practical use. Hence, it will be little use for professors to work, and our students, at the same time, can’t benefit from our professors. Moreover, work may impair the concentration of professors on their professions. This is not what we want, hence, whether job experience is useful or not depends on the professions.

On the whole, the engineering professors need to have a job experience because the aims of engineering education are pragmatism. On considering this, job relevant experience will enhance the understanding of professors on their professions. The Professor impart better on their classes which will lead the improvement of education. To the contrary, we do not mean professors in every subject need job relevant skills because some of subjects are only explored on academic level.

All in all, I think most professors who belong to the engineer school should have a job relevant experiences for offering pragmatic students to company. On the contrary, not all subjects should do so. Therefore, asking for job experience to professors depends on the professions they devote in.

haunteagleUID: 2609432

TOPIC: ISSUE50 - "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."
WORDS: 511
TIME: 01:00:00
DATE: 2009/6/4 18:51:31
The speaker alleges that professions in college should be required to work outside the academic world for improving the quality of education. To some extent, I find this claim is specious because it neglect the characteristics of some subjects which aims are not pragmatism. On the contrary, I agree with this assertion insofar as professors get a better understanding about differences between the academy and the requirement of work. What's more, a job related experiences can also update professors' obsolete knowledge and which, on the other hand, surely prove the quality of education.

Firstly, jobs, to professors, can decrease the gap between academy and work. Currently, companies always require their applicants have some relevant experiences in certain area. Why? Because the knowledge we have learned in class may quit far away from reality and the study in college mainly stays on the academic level which, more or less, may quarantine the study from the reality. Therefore, if professors in college could have a experience in professions relevant job, they will know how to teach at a practical level and impartial the latest technology to their students, and, of course, our students will benefit a lot from it due to professors' experience.
Secondly, since today's world is rapid developing, professors' knowledge may be out of date. However, jobs always require the optimal solutions which ask for the latest and advanced technologies to improve the current conditions. Hence, if they get a chance to work in his profession relevant area, professors have update their knowledge to meet the job's requirements, and students will get a reliable and effective path to run after the latest trends in their professions relevant area at work. Besides, students equipped with job relevant knowledge also cater to the companies' tastes.
The speaker, however, dismiss some subjects purely intend on academic level such as math, physics or arts. In these areas, professions need not have a job experiences because these professions are always propelled by experiments and theoretic research, and show little relevance to practical use. Hence, it will be little use for professors to work, and our students, at the same time, can’t benefit from our professors. Moreover, work may impair the concentration of professors on their professions. This is not what we want, hence, whether job experience is useful or not depends on the professions.
On the whole, the engineering professors need to have a job experience because the aims of engineering education are pragmatism. On considering this, job relevant experience will enhance the understanding of professors on their professions. The Professor impart better on their classes which will lead the improvement of education. To the contrary, we do not mean professors in every subject need job relevant skills because some of subjects are only explored on academic level.
All in all, I think most professors who belong to the engineer school should have a job relevant experiences for offering pragmatic students to company. On the contrary, not all subjects should do so. Therefore, asking for job experience to professors depends on the professions they devote in.

开头很明确，给出自己观点和下面两个对应分论点
第一段，实际经验对求职的重要性。
第二段，获得最新的知识
第三段，对某些具体学科没用
总结

文字很流畅，比我遣词用句好，我就不献丑了。

思路很明确，但是有以下几点不足
1.
可能吹毛求疵了，不过如果每段能有更加独特的见解更好，这三个都太大众化了，我读了三十多篇issue50大半都是这几条，能有一条很新颖的理由就行了
2.
这个话题跟我们生活结合可以说很密切，在没有例子的情况下结合一下自身的经历也是一种很好的例子，文中缺乏了