原文如下
A portrait type that appeared with relentless frequency in eighteenth-century England is the familiar image of a gentleman poised with one hand inside his partially unbuttoned waistcoat. Standard interpretations of this portrait posture offer observations of correspondence----demonstrating either that it mirrors actual social behavior or that it borrows from classical statuary. Such explanations, however, illuminate neither the source of this curious convention nor the reason for its popularity. It is true that in real life the "hand-in" was a common stance for elite men. Still, there were other ways of comporting the body that did not become winning portrait formulas. And even if the "hand-in" portrait does resemble certain classical statues, what accounts for the adoption of this particular pose?
Which of the following might provide an explanation for the popularity of the hand-in portraits that would satisfy the author of the passage? Select ALL that apply.
A. An eighteenth-century English etiquette manual discussing the social implications of the "hand-in" stance.
B. A comprehensive catalogue of eighteenth-century English portraits that showed what proportion of portraits depicted gentlemen in the "hand-in" stance.
C. A passage from an eighteenth-century English novel in which a gentleman considers what stance to adopt when his portrait his painted. 答案是AC。
不太理解A, 原文不是说了 Standard interpretations of this portrait posture offer observations of correspondence----demonstrating either that it mirrors actual social behavior or that it borrows from classical statuary. Such explanations, however, illuminate neither the source of this curious convention nor the reason for its popularity.
原文不是说了social classical statuary 的解释是不能解释它的流行的吗......neither nor
那为什么可以A呢?
真心求教~谢谢!2.12就要考了
Keep in mind that the questions says: "which of the following might provide an explanation... that would satisfy the author of the passage?"
The key word here is "might." We don't need to look for something that would DEFINITELY provide an explanation that would satisfy the author. Instead, we need to think about what the author already knows, and ask ourselves whether each of the three sources can provide the author with new information. If a source cannot tell the author something that he / she does not know yet, then it cannot provide an explanation that would satisfy the author.
You're right that the 18th Century English etiquette manual (A) might actually have information that doesn't answer satisfy the author. However, it is definitely possible that the manual could have information that does satisfy the author. Therefore, we can say that A "might provide an explanation... that would satisfy the author." Therefore, A is correct :)
I hope that helps!
找到了一个magoosh的解答,觉得还很正确的……来分享讨论一下。我觉得看提干真的好重要……是might!!!!
Standard interpretations of this portrait posture offer observations of correspondence----demonstrating either that it mirrors actual social behavior or that it borrows from classical statuary. Such explanations, however, illuminate neither the source of this curious convention nor the reason for its popularity.