3月18号日志:
1997-08-p5:
Listen to part of a talk in an art history class. You may remeber that a few weeks ago, we discussed the(a) question of what photography is. Is it art, or is it a(the) method of reproducing images? Do(To) photographs belong museums or just in our homes? Today, I want to talk about a person who try to make his(its) professional life(like) an(and) answer to such questions. Alfred Stieglitz went from the United States to Germany to study engineering. While he was there, he became interested in photography and began to experiment with his camera. He took pictures under conditions that most photographers considered too difficult. He took them at night, in the rain and people and objects reflected(who flighted) in windows. When he returned to the United States, he continued these(this) revolutionary efforts. Stieglitz was the first person to photograph skyscrapers, clouds and views from an(the) airplane. What Stieglitz was trying to do in his(these) photographs was what he tried(trying) to do throughout his life: make photography an art. He thought(felt) that photography could be just as a good formal self-expression as painting and drawing. For Stieglitz, his camera was his brush. While(From) many photographers of(in) the late 1800s and early 1900s, thought(sorts) of their works as a(are)
reproductions of identical(by demical) images, Stieglitz saw his as a creative art form. He understood the power of the camera to capture(catch) the moment. In fact, he never retouched his prints or made copies of them. If he(you) were in this classroom today, I'm sure he'd say(you'll see), "Well, painters don't normally make extra copies of their paintings, do they(still today.)?"
1997-10-p5:
Listen to part of a lecture in a geology class. I'm glad you brought up the question of(over) our investigations into the makeup of the earth's interior. In fact, since this is the topic of your reading assignment for next time, let me spend these(this) last few minutes of class talking about it. There were several important discoveries in the early(year) part of this cenruty that help geologists develop a more accurate picture of the earth's interior. The first key discovery had to do with seismic(science make) waves. Remember, they are the vibrations casued by earthquakes. Well, scientists found that they travel thousands of miles through the earth's interior. This finding(found) enable geologists to study the inner parts of the earth. You see, these(the) studies revealed(reviewed) that these vibrations were of two types: compression or P-waves and shear or S-waves. And researches found that P-waves travel through both (of) liquids and solids, and S-waves travel only through solid matter. In 1906, a British geologist discovered that P-waves slowed down at a certain depth and kept travelling deeper. On the other hands, S-waves either(even) disappeared or were(over and over) reflected back. So he (can) concluded that the depth maked the boundary between the solid mantle and liquid core. Three years later, (an) another boundary was discovered, that between the mantle and the earth's crust. there are(is) still a lot to be learned about the earth. For instance(Prinstons), geologists know that the core is hot. Evidence of this is the molten lava that flows out of( flows and) volcanoes. But we are still not sure what the source of the heat is.
1998-01-p3:
Listen to part of a lecture in a composition class. By the end of the term, I hope you will be(you've been) convinced as I am that fomal writing always requires revision. Sometimes it requires a fairly major rewriting of the(a) paper. Some students have the(a) mistaken idea that revision means(of revisioning,) simply making corrections in spelling and grammer. I call that proofreading. What I expect you to do with your revise is to evaluate and improve the overall effectiveness(of factness) of your paper. But how can you tell if(that) your paper is effective? Well, for example, start by(stop) asking yourself these questions: Is the topic restricted enough to be fully discussed within the given length(lank)? Are the main ideas clear? Are they supported by specific details and examples? Do they move smoothly from one idea to the next? You need enough time for a possible major overhaul. That is you may have to make a lot of changes before your paper becomes really clear to the reader. So I'll expecte a preliminary draft of each paper two weeks before the final due date. That way I can criticize it and get it back in time for you to revise it. Then you can submit a final draft for grading. This process may seem like a great deal of trouble at first, but I think you'll find it valuable. In fact, after you finish this course, I doubt(debt) you will ever turn in a(the) term paper without first revising it carefully. |