Issue225 还有5天考试 请务必看看

huijuan1210UID：200139

快考试了，心里挺没底的，大部分时间在闭门造车，
想想还是让大家帮我看看有没有什么大的毛病。
这片基本上就是我的风格了。不算是拿手的，也不算BT的。
在word该了错字和基本语法错误，大的变动就没有了。
有没有4分呢？

Issue225  让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：40分1秒     638 words
从2005年3月27日19时19分到2005年3月27日19时40分
------题目------
People often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms; we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.
------正文------
In the statement, the speaker claims that it should be avoided to compare a thing to something else, as the comparison could be unhelpful or harmful, and therefore a thing should only be considered on its own terms. However, whiling conceding that to entirely understand a thing, it is necessary to consider its own properties, I disagree with the speaker that similarities should be ignored, for the reason that the procedure for people to understand a thing is to firstly look for similarities and then to consider itself.

Admittedly, only through looking for similarities to learn a thing could be incomprehensive. A Hindi fable comes to mind immediately to support the statement. The story is about several blind men, who try to learn what an elephant looks like. One man touches the ear and claims an elephant should like a fan; the second one touches the tail and asserts an elephant should be similar to a rope; the third one touches the body of the elephant and declares it as a wall; all of rests make similar contention. Obviously, none of them get the correct idea of the elephant as they only manage to perceive a limited idea of the whole. In short, only focusing on similarities on things is not enough to fully understand the thing.

However, understanding the similarities between a thing and others is the fist step of the learning progress. People learn the world from very beginning. To a great extent, every new subject is perceived firstly by its similarities to matters that have already been known, and then regarded as its own terms. One can look no further than how a baby learns the world. An infant has no idea about the world initially. He is only able to receive basic knowledge gradually. Everything to learn deserves a standard. What is cup? A baby may define it as the thing to retain water. The reason that he can recognize a cup despite various sizes, colors, and designs should be the similarity of those cups that they have the ability to contain water. Similarly, adults learn through similarities as well. To prove this, one can recall all general impressions we have in our brain: people’s gender is determined by the similar body shape; mobile phone is a device with buttons of digit number that use for communication. That we are able to recognize a thing as a noun is because of the similarities it appears to the database in our brain. In short, without looking for similarities, nothing could be recognized at all.

What should be conceded is that attention on similarities itself is not enough to realize a thing all-rounded and may cause misunderstanding as the fable mentioned before, therefore a thing should be considered on its own speciality aside from the similarities. Take a rectangle and a parallelogram for instance. One may know that a rectangle has a lot of similarities with a parallelogram, or more specifically saying that a rectangle is a special form of parallelogram. Therefore, to recognize a rectangle well, not only its similarities with a parallelogram should be learned, such as every two sides are parallel to each other, but its special properties should be realized. For example, the internal angle of the rectangle is ninety degrees. Without recognizing both similarities and specialities, analogous matters are not able to be discriminated from others.

In sum, to understand a thing, the tendency of looking for similarities should not be avoided as it is the very first step to perceive a subject, and a thing should be considered on itself as well since only looking on similarities may lead to misunderstanding.

wanggoudanUID：166988

ni 怎么还能有5天时间呢？

huijuan1210UID：200139

不是吗？我五月三号考呢！！
不过大家是不是都已经考完了？看着好像这里冷清很多~

germansheperdUID：195129

This piece is very cogent chiefly due to the very compelling examples the writer cites in her writing.On the other hand I suggest the writer include people's appreciation and criticism of artwork by drawing analogies.

花心大萝卜UID：121548

5.3?????????????????

huijuan1210UID：200139

不是很明白这个artwork应该怎么用？similar美学观点？