- 最后登录
- 2008-12-5
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1613
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-8-7
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 447
- UID
- 173612
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1613
- 注册时间
- 2004-8-7
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
The argument seems logical on the surface, while consideration will expose several logical fallacies resulting its' false conclusion which will be discussed in details below. (哇,这么玄,没有人的参与?而且百套百灵。我也得好好整理模版了)
First of all, the argument relies on the unfounded assumption that the large amount of red meat in the diet results in the disease. The arguer does not provide the statistics in details that(换个which吧) could show fact that the more people consume the red meat, the greater possibilities they have heart diseases, nor did give any scientific facts the prove the specific relationship between the two needless to say causal relationship. Without direct objective facts, the conclusion maybe the subjective imagination of the arguer.(我也知道却事实和分析,但要写出来,什么事实可以推得结论或给出事实不足时的可能结论)
Secondly, without taking into account many other reasons that result(cause?) the heart diseases, the argument fails to be convincing. In common experiences, heart diseases result from many synthetic reasons, such as genetic influences, living habits, working pressure, emotional conditions, etc. It is very probable the people in the survey who regularly eat red meat are those who have a heavy burden of jobs and furthermore are very oppressive, which is the true reason of their heart diseases. While their consumption of red meat is just because of its conveniences, (分句的后半句呢?)which is not the main reason. Also probably the few(the few是强调多还是少?) people in the survey have problematic genes relevant to heart diseases and happen to enjoy the taste of red meat. Either scenario, if true, the relationship would not lend any reliable credence to the conclusion.(呵呵,条理居然没乱,好好向你学习)
Even though the red meat has some extent of relationship with the heart diseases, the conclusion that it is iron that have the most important role is hasty. The arguer fails to consider other possible substances in the red meat that result in the disease. If other food which also have iron, even a larger amount, have no relationship with the disease, the conclusion is probable wrong. Furthermore, it is very probable that the red meat eater always addictive to it and every time they eat red meat they tend to have much more than their stomach could sustain, which result the heavy burden to their body and result in the disease(新鲜). Without all these and other possible, the arguer fails to convince me his conclusion.
In sum, the argument does not provide any direct relationship between the red meat and the heart disease, neither does it consider other possible reasons, which result its logical problems. Hence, the argument that iron levels in the red meat lead to heart disease is unfounded.
唔,好思路!
作者避过了牛羊肉是否有害一点,只将其左可能原因。
1 无科学根据,太笼统
2 很棒! 心脏病他因引起
3 聪明!铁与心脏病无关,他因
不过将牛羊肉有害左可能原因,是否间接承认原文观点?有循环论证之嫌? |
|