- 最后登录
- 2013-5-16
- 在线时间
- 281 小时
- 寄托币
- 645
- 声望
- 8
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-16
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 587
- UID
- 2546647
- 声望
- 8
- 寄托币
- 645
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-16
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
One aim of teachers or professors(老师是总称) in universities is to impart knowledge to their students. Therefore, here come to a tense(没见过,可以serious or critical) issue whether teachers or professor ought to be awarded according to their students' performance. A group of people are not supportive of the view, because students' learning ability vary and it is not fair for teachers or professors to completely answer for a student's study. However, in my perspective, teachers or professors should be evaluated and paid based on the performance of students. And my reasons are as follows.( Q! z) O8 \+ v8 N. ^
To begin with, teachers and professor are responsible for students' study. Although it is the students not teachers to(that 当强调句时) learn knowledge, yet still teachers or professors play an important role in education. From one hand(我查了,只有on the one hand), the primary task of instructors is to impart knowledge and improve students' abilities; while(这两句没有转折的意思,应是并列或递进) from the other hand, students pay a great sum of money to receive education from schools or universities(school 包含university). Therefore, it is instructs' obligation to enhance a student's study. Just as employees are paid based on the profits that they make for companies, teachers and professors should be awarded by the performance of their students. If there is no relationship between a instructor's profits and a student's score, the only impulse for instructors to be responsible for their students is professional ethics. Nevertheless, it is not effective to guarantee the level of education only relying on ethics. Based on the analysis above, since the education level is partly related with teachers and professors, I am convinced that awards of instructors are in accordance with the performance of students.
8 n6 ^5 h% Q% h0 E, f,O
Furthermore, if salaries of teachers are based on the performance of students, it will improve the relationship between students and instructors. Because the income of instructors depends on their students, teachers and professor are willing to contact with(程度轻) students to improve their grades. Meanwhile, those who want (to)receive instructions from teachers would like to ask their instructors for help. Consequently, it will spur them to communicate with each other and the merits are manifest. For one thing, students could more likely to get suggestions from their advisors, which is beneficial for their study; for the other thing, since professors in universities could better learn students, it is more possible for those professors to choose (those)excellent to help them make researches. Considering the benefits above, I maintain that income of instructors is based on performance of students.' b2 g2 A4 o( }2 r/ n6 j$ E; F' C' `
The third reason why I advocate establishing connection between income of instructors and students' study is because it is fairer to award teachers and professors according to their students' performance. In most cases, if instructors allocate more time and energy on their students, students would make a great progress. Thus, it is necessarily acceptable to award those teachers who made massive efforts on their students.这里的fairer是有比较的,这里没找到比较对象9 B7 e& R# W% q" U/ A' k
# \/ O( n' B3 Y是
In sum, because of the responsibility of instructors, improvement of relationship between students and teachers, and equality to award, I am verified that the awards of instructors should be related to the performance of their students.
整体不错,但没有例子,读起来像你在一直讲道理,第一个论点的主题句responsibility of instructors感觉与下文论证关系不太密切,因为有义务教导学生与工资和学生表现挂钩联系不紧,不如改成虽然教授学生是老师的义务,但老师也需要用这种机制来促使他们更加努力的工作。 |
|