[i习作temp] 新G issue1 习作求好心人帮忙改改~ [复制链接]

hjmzqwz
UID: 3134717

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 22
注册时间: 2011-7-21
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2011-7-21 23:09:12 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

新G issue 只有30分钟，请问大概多长够用啊……感觉正常发挥的话只能写到450到500字啊……很纠结

Witnessing so amazing development of humansociety in the past decades, we definitely perceive how our life changed withupdating of technology. And as a member of society, at the same time, everyperson’s life surely dramatically changed compared with the past decades ago.It is a truthuniversally acknowledged that novel technology makes our lifeconvenient, and inevitably makes many people much lazier. Nevertheless, I deemthat, in fact, the ability of humans to think for themselves won’t decreasedespite more rely on technology to solve problems.

My perspective can be well illustrated bythe following fact of computer. Although many people feel that human becamemuch lazier after the invention of some stupid-proof product like computer, andthen decrease our ability of thinking for ourselves, what I want to claim ismore powerful the computer is, stronger ability of thinking ourselves isneeded. Because only know as much as we can about people's demand, cantechnicians design so perfect program nowadays to complete varied requirement.In addition, to make the body of computer so tiny to be convenient to move orcarry, the skill in the aspect of processing and manufacturing is also supposedto be increasingly higher, which means a further awareness of thinking. That isa universal fact in our society for every person there have the scale he or shecares about or think about. Hence, the rely on technology won't decreasehuman's ability of thinking.

Besides such an obvious aspect, I wouldlike to provide another point to support my view. According to the relationshipbetween the supply and demand in market, the rely on technology will stimulatethe update of old technology and the invention of novel device, which leadingto the demand of deeper knowledge and awareness in these scope. What's more, inthe cause of seeking deeper knowledge, human will think deeper about everythingin this scope after which a more suitable product will be born. As a result,human will have more dependent on such technology--- a positive cycle formed asa result, which proves our ability of thinking won’t be deleterious.

Admittedly, although the ability ofthinking for ourselves won't decrease from the views of whole society, maybe itis impossible to expect everyone can hold this ability in every scope. Afterall, a man obtaining convenient technology probably just wants to know how touse it other than deeper principles about production. So we won't be surprisedthat a engineer who just know how to take photo can’t explain how the imageoccurs on the screen.

To sum up, the rely on increasingconvenient technology to solve problems, maybe leading people unwilling toacquire details in some scales, won’t let our ability of thinking for ourselvesloss or
be deteriorated in that everyperson should think more in his or her own special domain.