寄托天下
查看: 819|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue83 最后一周,大家看看有没有3.5分 [复制链接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

声望
53
寄托币
2732
注册时间
2007-2-4
精华
1
帖子
359
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-3-19 18:18:42 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ISSUE83 - "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
WORDS: 639          TIME: 0:37:37          DATE: 2007-3-19

Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their nature state, as the speaker asserts? In my view, I strongly agree with the speaker because confirmed that the wilderness areas need to be preserved and it is the government’s responsibility to make it.

To begin with, the first reason why I fundamentally agree with the speaker is the fact that many valuable species are facing the threatening of extinction. As we all know, in many wilderness areas, there are a lot of endangered species. At the same time, many organs on their body are very valuable for people. Therefore, most of these organs can be sold in a high price. Hence, in order to earn this profit, although these areas are often extremely remote, there are still many hunters spare no effort to go to these wilderness areas to capture these species wilderness. And the hunting has already led to the extinction of many species. Under such circumstance, the government should establish strict law against such illegal action. Without this kind of law, more and more valuable species will be extinction. To shed light on this assertion one needs look no further than the Chinese tiger, one of the most valuable animals in the world. In ancient time, there are thousands of hundreds of this kind of animals living in China. Yet, due to the over-hunting of many people, this kind of tiger has recently been reported to be extinct by the researchers. Therefore, in order not to avoid the occurrence of the extinction of other valuable species, the government should try their best to oppose this kind of hunting.

Another reason why I generally agree with this statement is the fact that environmental pollution in some of these areas is extremely perilous. Nowadays, with the high development of industrialization, the society are facing more and more serious pollution problem. Numerous factories were built and thus a lot of polluted water was emitted every day to the water. Since the water in river will flow, it is nature that with the flow of water many chemical materials will be transmitted to these wilderness areas. As a result, many plants will absorb and many animals will drink this kind of polluted water thus threatening the life of them. When we consider the DDT, we can see no reason to deny this assertion. Now researchers have found that in the stomach of many animals in wilderness areas there were many element of DDT-one kind of pesticide was once used for a long time. So, at this time, an effective way solve this problem is that the government send some experts there to cope with this environmental problem. Through this way we can preserve many species which are now endangered due to the modernization of human beings.

The third reason why I agree with the speaker is due to the fact that tourism is becoming popular in some wilderness areas. With the development of transportation, many wilderness areas which were remote extremely are accessible for the people. Meanwhile, due to the curiosity of human beings, many people go to these place to take a risk and have a relax. However, many people do not know how to protect these places. They dump the trash everywhere and thus making the environment there become much worse. Moreover, due to the existence of human beings, the living habit of many animals have changed and thus causing the imbalance of ecosystem. Therefore, government should establish relevant laws to restrict the tourists to such places and instill people with the knowledge about the importance of protecting these places.

All in all, from what has been discussed above, we can safely draw our conclusion that due to the development of technology, most of these wilderness areas are suffering more and more serious problems. It is the responsibility of the government to try their best to preserve these areas thus preserving the whole earth.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
2781
注册时间
2006-7-27
精华
0
帖子
44
沙发
发表于 2007-3-19 18:51:00 |只看该作者
Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their nature state, as the speaker asserts? In my view, I strongly agree with the speaker because confirmed that the wilderness areas need to be preserved and it is the government’s responsibility to make it前面的论点可以理解,后面这个就不大懂了,再往下看.

To begin with, the first reason why I fundamentally agree with the speaker is the fact that many valuable species are facing the threatening of extinction. 其实我明白你的意思,可是为什么要保护wilderness还是不明确哦,你说呢?As we all know, in many wilderness areas, there are a lot of endangered species. At the same time, many organs on their body are very valuable for people. Therefore, most of these organs can be sold in a high price. Hence, in order to earn this profit,太罗嗦了,地球人都知道的事,说重点好了 although these areas are often extremely remote, there are still many hunters spare no effort to go to these wilderness areas to capture these species wilderness. And the hunting has already led to the extinction of many species. Under such circumstance, the government should establish strict law against such illegal action. Without this kind of law, more and more valuable species will be extinction. To shed light on this assertion one needs look no further than the Chinese tiger, one of the most valuable animals in the world. In ancient time, there are thousands of hundreds of this kind of animals living in China. Yet, due to the over-hunting of many people, this kind of tiger has recently been reported to be extinct by the researchers. Therefore, in order not to avoid the occurrence of the extinction of other valuable species, the government should try their best to oppose this kind of hunting令人感动的东北虎亚,可是禁止捕猎和保护荒地也不是相等的亚.

Another reason why I generally agree with this statement is the fact that environmental pollution in some of these areas is extremely perilous. Nowadays, with the high development of industrialization, the society are facing more and more serious pollution problem. Numerous factories were built and thus a lot of polluted water was emitted every day to the water. Since the water in river will flow, it is nature that with the flow of water many chemical materials will be transmitted to these wilderness areas. As a result, many plants will absorb and many animals will drink this kind of polluted water thus threatening the life of them. When we consider the DDT, we can see no reason to deny this assertion. Now researchers have found that in the stomach of many animals in wilderness areas there were many element of DDT-one kind of pesticide was once used for a long time. So, at this time, an effective way to solve this problem is that the government send some experts there to cope with this environmental problem. Through this way we can preserve many species which are now endangered due to the modernization of human beings.文字上我只有学习的份儿了,可是与题目什么关系呢?

The third reason why I agree with the speaker is due to the fact that tourism is becoming popular in some wilderness areas.题目主要是谈那些没人去的地方,窃以为跑题了。。。 With the development of transportation, many wilderness areas which were remote extremely are accessible for the people. Meanwhile, due to the curiosity of human beings, many people go to these place to take a risk and have a relax. However, many people do not know how to protect these places. They dump the trash everywhere and thus making the environment there become much worse. Moreover, due to the existence of human beings, the living habit of many animals have changed and thus causing the imbalance of ecosystem. Therefore, government should establish relevant laws to restrict the tourists to such places and instill people with the knowledge about the importance of protecting these places. Why是政府呢?还是不知道

All in all, from what has been discussed above, we can safely draw our conclusion that due to the development of technology, most of these wilderness areas are suffering more and more serious problems. It is the responsibility of the government to try their best to preserve these areas thus preserving the whole earth.文字上是肯定没问题了,不过……lz自己看吧

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
655
注册时间
2007-2-26
精华
0
帖子
6
板凳
发表于 2007-3-19 19:00:13 |只看该作者
结构上(只看了结构)
3段全部是赞成?没有critical thinking吗?
1段的观点没问题
但是第2段观点似乎有点远
第3段的观点也凑合
但是楼主没谈even though后面的东西,就是remote,导致论证不够深入
评分的话,应该在3.5~4分吧
奥特曼中国联盟
www.ultramanclub.com

ME
Applied: 15
Offer: 1
AD: 3
Rej: 3

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
36
注册时间
2006-7-31
精华
0
帖子
0
地板
发表于 2007-3-19 23:19:44 |只看该作者
很不错, 应该在4~5 之间吧,
come on !!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

声望
53
寄托币
2732
注册时间
2007-2-4
精华
1
帖子
359
5
发表于 2007-3-19 23:30:34 |只看该作者
怎么三个人三个分数,你们叫别人怎么看啊

使用道具 举报

RE: issue83 最后一周,大家看看有没有3.5分 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue83 最后一周,大家看看有没有3.5分
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-630961-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部